There have been two changes in parallel, vmgump switched to Java6 and
Xalan has been added as a dependency.
Given that the tests passed on gump.zones.ao before I added Xalan (and
this has been running Java6 before), I'd suggest that the
configuration committers experiment with using Xalan 2.7.1 in
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=137418&projectId=22
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 15 Jan 2009 07:42:02 -0800
Finished at: Thu 15 Jan 2009 07:43:34 -0800
Total time: 1m 32s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numbe
Hi folks,
looking at my workload I will be able to cut an RC plus patch work
starting in February - would this be okay for you?
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Russel Winder wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 09:30 +, Russel Winder wrote:
>
>
>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-170 is
On 2009-01-14, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2009-01-13, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> The next Gump build (after the currently running one) will use Xerces'
> and xml-api's trunk.
The tests still passed. Next up is Xalan.
Stefan
-
Hello.
> I agree with code reuse, though. Perhaps we could have a very generic
> superinterface for the shared parts like convergence settings or max
> iterations and things like that. But the "solve" methods should be
> separate, and even probably have different names to stay on the safe side.
>
On 15/01/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
>
> >
> > Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> > > Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> > >>
>
> > >> Note that the above breaks binary and source compatibility.
> > Therefore,
> > >> at the least, such changes deserve notable me
Hi.
> In my opinion, "rootfinders" and "minimumfinders" are clearer; hence the
> suggestion "root" and [...]
An alternative name could also be "zero".
Best,
Gilles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@com
> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
>
> Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> > Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >>
> >> Note that the above breaks binary and source compatibility.
> Therefore,
> >> at the least, such changes deserve notable mentions in the release
> >> notes and often additional thoug
10 matches
Mail list logo