On Jan 12, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Ralph Goers schrieb:
On Jan 12, 2009, at 7:49 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2009-01-12, Ralph Goers wrote:
I could also use some help understanding why these tests are
failing.
I can't duplicate these failures.
The tests only fail if you
Ralph Goers schrieb:
On Jan 12, 2009, at 7:49 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2009-01-12, Ralph Goers wrote:
I could also use some help understanding why these tests are failing.
I can't duplicate these failures.
The tests only fail if you use Gump-built artifacts (i.e. trunk
instead of the
>> 6) delete dir1 + add dir1/bla.txt
>> Like in every shell, I would think that this would delete all dir1/*
>> files first, and then adds a new file bla.txt in dir1.
>
> Tthe question is whether it is missing an
>
> add dir1/
>
> Do we create directories implicit?
In my opinion, yes. If you look
On Jan 12, 2009, at 7:49 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2009-01-12, Ralph Goers wrote:
I could also use some help understanding why these tests are failing.
I can't duplicate these failures.
The tests only fail if you use Gump-built artifacts (i.e. trunk
instead of the specified versions) fo
On 2009-01-12, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I could also use some help understanding why these tests are failing.
> I can't duplicate these failures.
The tests only fail if you use Gump-built artifacts (i.e. trunk
instead of the specified versions) for the dependencies.
I haven't figured out which arti
On 2009-01-12, Ralph Goers wrote:
> OK. Someone more knowledgeable in Gump is going to have to explain to
> me why this failed even though the build succeeded.
I'll be happy to.
> I can see that it is looking for commons-vfs-2.0-SNAPSHOT.jar? That
> jar is created by vfs-core and ends up in cor
Hi Russel,
see my comments below
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Russel Winder wrote:
> Last year there was a lot of effort trying to get Commons CLI into a fit
> state for a 1.2 release -- much credit to Emmanuel Bourg.
>
> However, having got the Subversion 1.x branch of Commons CLI into a fit
> st
I could also use some help understanding why these tests are failing.
I can't duplicate these failures.
Ralph
On Jan 12, 2009, at 2:12 AM, Gump wrote:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/
OK. Someone more knowledgeable in Gump is going to have to explain to
me why this failed even though the build succeeded. I can see that it
is looking for commons-vfs-2.0-SNAPSHOT.jar? That jar is created by
vfs-core and ends up in core/target/. Why did this work for the prior
version whic
Last year there was a lot of effort trying to get Commons CLI into a fit
state for a 1.2 release -- much credit to Emmanuel Bourg.
However, having got the Subversion 1.x branch of Commons CLI into a fit
state for a 1.2 release, nothing seems to have happened. This is a
great shame -- 1.2-SNAPSHOT
i also think everything is good.
2009/1/12 Seba
> I send you the content as I got it.
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Siegfried Goeschl <
> siegfried.goes...@it20one.at> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> not screenshots for the moment but it would be a good idea to have one ...
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Sieg
> We currently have no mv in the ChangeSet and I would propose that we
> start with delete and add operations (testcases below) for version
> 0.1.
Well, that's where it gets interesting ;)
> "Also how do we deal with directories?
> delete dir1
> add dir1/test.txt
>
> mv dir1/test.text dir2/test.t
I send you the content as I got it.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Siegfried Goeschl <
siegfried.goes...@it20one.at> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> not screenshots for the moment but it would be a good idea to have one ...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
> Ramiro Pereira de Magalhaes wrote:
> > Siegfried
Awesome. Did the changes and just committed.
cheers
--
Torsten
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 05:46, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> Could we maybe ask the jrpm project whether upgrading the license to
>>> ASL 2.0 would be an option? Would make things a little cleaner IMO.
>>
>> I just wrote the guys an
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue a
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
Hi,
not screenshots for the moment but it would be a good idea to have one ...
Thanks,
Siegfried Goeschl
Ramiro Pereira de Magalhaes wrote:
> Siegfried,
>
> I received your e-mails with all attachments and inline images.
> Everything seems fine. Do you have a model or something that we can
> us
Hi folks,
the vote DID NOT PASS
Oliver Heger: +1
Luc Maisonobe : +0
Some Notes
+) Luc spotted a javadoc problem in the main interface - using "/*" for
method comment instead of "/**" but I failed to see that problem (okay,
I can blame IntelliJ)
+) Findbugs complained about on or two other thing
Hi Mark,
just a quick note - since I started the processes without "su" they did
not start tomcat. Okay, that is expectet but the process were still
running in the background - so this could be an issue
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Mark Thomas wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Sie
19 matches
Mail list logo
