Re: [math] Complex nth roots

2009-01-05 Thread Phil Steitz
Phil Steitz wrote: Luc Maisonobe wrote: Phil Steitz a écrit : Ted Dunning wrote: I just check on how sbcl handles this. The result was mixed, but instructive as predicted. Positive and negative infinity behave as expected. ** (/ 1 0.0) #.SB-EXT:SINGLE-FLOAT-POSITIVE-INFINITY * (/ -1

Re: svn commit: r731405 - /commons/proper/daemon/trunk/src/native/unix/native/dso.h

2009-01-05 Thread Bill Barker
"Mark Thomas" wrote in message news:4961bda4.4070...@apache.org... > billbar...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: billbarker >> Date: Sun Jan 4 17:45:12 2009 >> New Revision: 731405 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=731405&view=rev >> Log: >> Only include Mac-specific files if compiling fo

Re: [SCXML] test should fail if serialisation work dir cannot be created

2009-01-05 Thread sebb
On 05/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:52 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 05/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:57 AM, sebb wrote: > >> > SCXMLTestHelper currently allows the test to continue if it cannot > >> > create the serialisation work directo

Re: [DAEMON] Need to get some patches committed

2009-01-05 Thread Mark Thomas
Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi, > > I can help out on Mac OS 10.4.1 as well > > Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> Hi, >> if you give me detailled instructions, I can test the issue on my Mac >> with 10.4.x installed. I can do this starting with 7th jan. Siegfried, Christian, all There is a snap

Re: [SCXML] test should fail if serialisation work dir cannot be created

2009-01-05 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:52 PM, sebb wrote: > On 05/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:57 AM, sebb wrote: >> > SCXMLTestHelper currently allows the test to continue if it cannot >> > create the serialisation work directory. >> > >> > Given that it now fails the test if

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.0.0 based on RC3

2009-01-05 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Luc Maisonobe a écrit : > Siegfried Goeschl a écrit : >> Hi folks, >> >> the following changes were made regarding the feedback from the previous >> vote >> >> 1) using "org.apache.commons"/"commons-exec" as groupId/artifactId >> 2) using SVN tag "EXEC_1_0_0" instead of "EXEC_1_0_0_RC3" (Rahul Alko

Re: [Commons-Digester] Question regarding next commons-digester Release

2009-01-05 Thread Volker Karlmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Thanx a lot :) Volker Rahul Akolkar schrieb: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Volker Karlmeier > wrote: Hello Digester-Freaks, > > I have entered an extension/a patch in Jira (digester-131). Might > it be possible for you to check if this exte

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.0.0 based on RC3

2009-01-05 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Siegfried Goeschl a écrit : > Hi folks, > > the following changes were made regarding the feedback from the previous > vote > > 1) using "org.apache.commons"/"commons-exec" as groupId/artifactId > 2) using SVN tag "EXEC_1_0_0" instead of "EXEC_1_0_0_RC3" (Rahul Alkolkar) > 3) fixed folder name in

Re: [SCXML] test should fail if serialisation work dir cannot be created

2009-01-05 Thread sebb
On 05/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:57 AM, sebb wrote: > > SCXMLTestHelper currently allows the test to continue if it cannot > > create the serialisation work directory. > > > > Given that it now fails the test if it cannot create/read the > > serialisation files,

Re: [Commons-Digester] Question regarding next commons-digester Release

2009-01-05 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Volker Karlmeier wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello Digester-Freaks, > > I have entered an extension/a patch in Jira (digester-131). > Might it be possible for you to check if this extension could be > included in next release ? > Wou

Re: [SCXML] test should fail if serialisation work dir cannot be created

2009-01-05 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:57 AM, sebb wrote: > SCXMLTestHelper currently allows the test to continue if it cannot > create the serialisation work directory. > > Given that it now fails the test if it cannot create/read the > serialisation files, it seems to me that directory creation failure > shou

Re: [SCXML] svn commit: r731387

2009-01-05 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:41 AM, sebb wrote: > On 05/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 6:36 PM, wrote: >> > Author: sebb >> > Date: Sun Jan 4 15:36:29 2009 >> > New Revision: 731387 >> > >> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=731387&view=rev >> > Log: >> > Remov

[Commons Wiki] Update of "CreatingReleases" by sebbapache

2009-01-05 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by sebbapache: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases The comment on the change is: N&L files

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.0.0 based on RC3

2009-01-05 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
It should since I cut the release 2009 - let's blame it on Zune's Y2K9 problem :-) Siegfried Goeschl Oliver Heger wrote: > +1 > > The only thing I am not sure about is whether the copyright date in > NOTICE.txt needs to be updated for 2009. > > Oliver > > Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > >> Hi

[Commons Wiki] Update of "CreatingReleases" by SiegfriedGoeschl

2009-01-05 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by SiegfriedGoeschl: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases --

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.0.0 based on RC3

2009-01-05 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 The only thing I am not sure about is whether the copyright date in NOTICE.txt needs to be updated for 2009. Oliver Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi folks, > > the following changes were made regarding the feedback from the previous > vote > > 1) using "org.apache.commons"/"commons-exec" as gr

[VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.0.0 based on RC3

2009-01-05 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi folks, the following changes were made regarding the feedback from the previous vote 1) using "org.apache.commons"/"commons-exec" as groupId/artifactId 2) using SVN tag "EXEC_1_0_0" instead of "EXEC_1_0_0_RC3" (Rahul Alkolkar) 3) fixed folder name in the source distribution (Oliver Heger, Jörg

[SCXML] test should fail if serialisation work dir cannot be created

2009-01-05 Thread sebb
SCXMLTestHelper currently allows the test to continue if it cannot create the serialisation work directory. Given that it now fails the test if it cannot create/read the serialisation files, it seems to me that directory creation failure should also cause the test to fail. WDYT?

Re: [SCXML] svn commit: r731387

2009-01-05 Thread sebb
On 05/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 6:36 PM, wrote: > > Author: sebb > > Date: Sun Jan 4 15:36:29 2009 > > New Revision: 731387 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=731387&view=rev > > Log: > > Remove try/catch blocks for Exceptions that are not expected

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-01-05 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati

Re: [VFS] tests and project status

2009-01-05 Thread Ralph Goers
On Jan 5, 2009, at 12:58 AM, Mario Ivankovits wrote: Great to see that there is some development with VFS again! It's more motivating to work in a team :-) Thanks. I just set myself back a little bit though. It must be getting late. I have been trying to get the checkstyle reports to work

[Commons-Digester] Question regarding next commons-digester Release

2009-01-05 Thread Volker Karlmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Digester-Freaks, I have entered an extension/a patch in Jira (digester-131). Might it be possible for you to check if this extension could be included in next release ? Would free me from the need to use custom classes that overwrite digester fu

RE: [VFS] tests and project status

2009-01-05 Thread Mario Ivankovits
> > Great to see that there is some development with VFS again! It's > > more motivating to work in a team :-) > > > > Thanks. I just set myself back a little bit though. It must be > getting late. I have been trying to get the checkstyle reports to work > and I somehow managed to remove trunk in

Re: [VFS] tests and project status

2009-01-05 Thread Ralph Goers
On Jan 4, 2009, at 11:57 PM, Mario Ivankovits wrote: Awesome news! Mostly Mario was working on it ...Mario? Yes, great news if the tests work with Maven 2 now. And sure, go on and commit those things! I'll run them against my vmware VFS test server then. Great to see that there is some