Re: [DAEMON] Need to get some patches committed

Mark Thomas wrote: Therefore, I'd like to request commit access to commons daemon. All the paperwork is in place (I am a Tomcat committer and ASF member amongst other things) but I understand completely if you'd rather a current commons committer did the actual commits. Let me know how you want

Re: [DAEMON] Need to get some patches committed

So if the project PMC still see the value of procrun but has difficulty to have a current committer interested in maintaining it, I'm more than glad to help. I don't have the credit that Mark has. But I have spent quite some time with the source code of procrun and am pretty confident to maintain i

Re: [DAEMON] Need to get some patches committed

"Mark Thomas" wrote in message news:495df12a.3010...@apache.org... > Bill Barker wrote: >> "Mark Thomas" wrote in message >> news:495cc923.5020...@apache.org... >>> Folks, >>> >>> I have been working through some Tomcat bug reports and there are a >>> number >>> of >>> commons-daemon issues -

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Commons Digester 1.8.1

This vote has passed with 5 +1s from: Luc Maisonobe Oliver Heger Rahul Akolkar Jörg Schaible Phil Steitz (see recent v2.0 vote thread for vote cast) Thanks to everyone for taking a look, especially during the holidays. I will complete the pending tasks for both v1.8.1 and v2.0 and send out anno

Re: [SCXML] Deprecations in J6 branch (was: svn commit: r730816)

On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 5:54 AM, sebb wrote: > On 03/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> >> Fixed. Many of the test documents were using old-school attribute >> names that broke the tests when the corresponding deprecated methods >> were removed. While these didn't show up as compile-time referen

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Digester 2.0

On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> >> Phil - >> >> Thanks for taking a look. Did you intend to vote on the 1.8.1 thread >> instead? The 2.0 vote (this thread) has closed, while the 1.8.1 one is >> still active (for another few hours). >> >> -Rahul >> >> >

Re: [math] new incremental statistics project in C#

Bradford Cross wrote: The list might recall when I was working on so-called rolling statistics last year. I needed to use C# so I had to port what I needed from commons-math and extend for the rolling cases, and put it together with a pre-existing library. You might be interested in the project

Re: [math] Complex nth roots

Luc Maisonobe wrote: Phil Steitz a écrit : Ted Dunning wrote: I just check on how sbcl handles this. The result was mixed, but instructive as predicted. Positive and negative infinity behave as expected. ** (/ 1 0.0) #.SB-EXT:SINGLE-FLOAT-POSITIVE-INFINITY * (/ -1 0.0) * ***#.SB-EXT

Re: [math] Complex nth roots

Phil Steitz a écrit : > Ted Dunning wrote: >> I just check on how sbcl handles this. The result was mixed, but >> instructive as predicted. >> >> Positive and negative infinity behave as expected. >> >> ** (/ 1 0.0) >> #.SB-EXT:SINGLE-FLOAT-POSITIVE-INFINITY >> >> * (/ -1 0.0) >> * >> ***#.SB-EXT:

Re: [math] changing again decomposition/solvers API ?

Luc Maisonobe wrote: The decomposition/solvers API has changed several times these last weeks, but I would like to introduce one new change. The current status is something similar to: RealVector x = new XyzSolver(new XyzDecomposition(a)).solve(b); I would like to change it to: RealVecto

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Digester 2.0

Rahul Akolkar wrote: Phil - Thanks for taking a look. Did you intend to vote on the 1.8.1 thread instead? The 2.0 vote (this thread) has closed, while the 1.8.1 one is still active (for another few hours). -Rahul Sorry, I have been digging out of a backlog here and what I validated was th

Re: [math] Complex nth roots

Ted Dunning wrote: I just check on how sbcl handles this. The result was mixed, but instructive as predicted. Positive and negative infinity behave as expected. ** (/ 1 0.0) #.SB-EXT:SINGLE-FLOAT-POSITIVE-INFINITY * (/ -1 0.0) * ***#.SB-EXT:SINGLE-FLOAT-NEGATIVE-INFINITY * Square roots of ne

Re: [SCXML] Deprecations in J6 branch (was: svn commit: r730816)

On 03/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Rahul Akolkar > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 6:31 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 02/01/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > >>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 2:03 PM, wrote: > >>> > Author: sebb > >>> > Date: Fri Jan 2 11:03:42 20

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration. Th