Re: [digester] 1.8.1 (was: Release Commons Digester 2.0)

2008-12-30 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: > Struts 1 is still a JDK 1.4 project. I was hoping 1.8.1 would > eventually come out to address the issues already fixed in the branch. > Yup, theres more than Struts 1 in that category. Wanted to check whether you had anything specific in

Re: [digester] 1.8.1 (was: Release Commons Digester 2.0)

2008-12-30 Thread Paul Benedict
Struts 1 is still a JDK 1.4 project. I was hoping 1.8.1 would eventually come out to address the issues already fixed in the branch. Paul On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: >> Great news. >> >> Will 1.8.1 be released soo

[digester] 1.8.1 (was: Release Commons Digester 2.0)

2008-12-30 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: > Great news. > > Will 1.8.1 be released soon too? > Wasn't discussed (or planned, therefore). Are you looking for the post-1.8 fixes that are already in or something else? -Rahul > Paul > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Rahul Akolkar

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Commons Digester 2.0

2008-12-30 Thread Paul Benedict
Great news. Will 1.8.1 be released soon too? Paul On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > Sorry about the duplicate here, I missed the [RESULT] subject marker > the first time: > > This vote passes with atleast 3 +1s votes from: > > Luc Maisonobe > Paul Benedict (*) > Oliver Heg

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Commons Digester 2.0

2008-12-30 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Sorry about the duplicate here, I missed the [RESULT] subject marker the first time: This vote passes with atleast 3 +1s votes from: Luc Maisonobe Paul Benedict (*) Oliver Heger Rahul Akolkar Additionally, Jörg Schaible seemed to be in favor, but I didn't get a confirmation (the broken Javadoc l

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Digester 2.0

2008-12-30 Thread Rahul Akolkar
This vote passes with atleast 3 +1s votes from: Luc Maisonobe Paul Benedict (*) Oliver Heger Rahul Akolkar Additionally, Jörg Schaible seemed to be in favor, but I didn't get a confirmation (the broken Javadoc link on staging site is not a blocker IMO). Thanks for all input and I'll complete the

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Digester 2.0

2008-12-30 Thread Rahul Akolkar
+1 -Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration (in module apache-commons) failed

2008-12-30 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

Re: What is the correct ?! - WAS Re: [VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.0.0 based on EXEC_1_0_0_RC2 did not pass ....

2008-12-30 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > The "correct" groupId with respect to what Maven recommends should be > org.apache.commons. However, if a groupId is changed and the package names > are not changed at the same time it will cause nothing but grief for users > of the project.

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.0.0 based on EXEC_1_0_0_RC2 did not pass ....

2008-12-30 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> IMO ... >> >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Siegfried Goeschl >> wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> after more than one week I have to announce that the vote DID NOT PASS ... >>> >>> +) two +1 votes (Jörg, Sebastian)