Re: Proposal: Commons SAX

"I looked at XML Commons in xml.apache.org, but it seems pretty dormant." Perhaps this would be an opportunity to re-vitalize it? I really dislike the implication that Commons should accept a new project simply because a more appropriate parent project wasn't paying attention. -- Martin Cooper

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.0.0 based on EXEC_1_0_0_RC2

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi Rahul, > > +) I will double-check since I have also seen the problem before > +) would make a nice addition to the commons wiki > On item 2, absolutely, I think its atleast the 3rd RC bitten by this. TIA for wiki update. -Rahul >

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.0.0 based on EXEC_1_0_0_RC2

Hi Rahul, +) I will double-check since I have also seen the problem before +) would make a nice addition to the commons wiki Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Oliver Heger > wrote: > >> All looks good except for the folder name used in the sou

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.0.0 based on EXEC_1_0_0_RC2

Good point - I will add that tomorrow ... Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl Oliver Heger wrote: > All looks good except for the folder name used in the source > distribution: "commons-exec-2.4.1-src". I think this is caused by a > Maven bug, I've seen this before... > > Another point is that I was not a

Re: Sandbox - Pending Pipeline Changes

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Matt Sanford wrote: > > On Dec 16, 2008, at 03:36 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Ken Tanaka wrote: >>> >>> Your new patch looks good, I would say that it should be committed to the >>> project. >>> >> >> >> I have no cycles to eva

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.0.0 based on EXEC_1_0_0_RC2

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > All looks good except for the folder name used in the source distribution: > "commons-exec-2.4.1-src". I think this is caused by a Maven bug, I've seen > this before... > Hardcoding version # in assembly source descriptor is perhaps the best

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.0.0 based on EXEC_1_0_0_RC2

All looks good except for the folder name used in the source distribution: "commons-exec-2.4.1-src". I think this is caused by a Maven bug, I've seen this before... Another point is that I was not able to find your public key for verifying the signatures. It does not seem to be in KEYS [1].

[Commons Wiki] Update of "CreatingReleases" by RahulAkolkar

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases The comment on the change is: Clarify one-time nature of m2 setup, and correct numb

[Commons Wiki] Update of "CreatingReleases" by SiegfriedGoeschl

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by SiegfriedGoeschl: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases --

Re: [Commons Wiki] Update of "CreatingReleases" by SiegfriedGoeschl

Neat :-) One comment below ... On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Apache Wiki wrote: > Dear Wiki user, > > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for > change notification. > > The following page has been changed by SiegfriedGoeschl: > http://wiki.apache.org/commons/

Re: Sandbox - Pending Pipeline Changes

On Dec 16, 2008, at 03:36 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Ken Tanaka wrote: Your new patch looks good, I would say that it should be committed to the project. I have no cycles to evaluate [pipeline] contributions, but I can get stuff into the [pipeline] trunk

Re: Proposal: Commons SAX

FOP basically does all its XML parsing based on SAX. I don't see too much overlap right now (without looking more closely). But maybe someone can see something worth copying/moving in such a Commons SAX. A colleague of mine had to implement something like a TeeContentHandler a few weeks ago. So I g

Proposal: Commons SAX

Hi, In the Apache Tika project [1] we use SAX quite a lot, and have written a set of quite useful general utility classes for SAX handling. For example, in org.apache.tika.sax [2] we have the following: * ContentHandlerDecorator - Convenient base class for writing ContentHandler decorators * Emb

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati

[Commons Wiki] Update of "CreatingReleases" by SiegfriedGoeschl

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by SiegfriedGoeschl: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases --