Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=127342&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 28 Nov 2008 21:07:27 -0800
Finished at: Fri 28 Nov 2008 21:08:39 -0800
Total time: 1m 12s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Buil
Thanks Niall, comments below.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only thing I don't like is the release plugin changes the scm
> section in the pom.xml to point to the RC1 tag.
Ah, I now remember a similar discussion from the v0.8 vote. It seems
the
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=127291&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 28 Nov 2008 17:57:43 -0800
Finished at: Fri 28 Nov 2008 17:58:42 -0800
Total time: 59s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build N
The only thing I don't like is the release plugin changes the scm
section in the pom.xml to point to the RC1 tag. However thats a minor
nit and everything else looks good (tested on JDK 1.6) - so +1 from
me.
Also BeanUtils now has a 1.8.0 release and the Changes Plugin just
release version 2.1[1]
I just read all of these references, but they all seem confined to
relatively naive implementations of multiply. Notably, they didn't do the
standard two levels of block decomposition that is typically necessary to
get good register and cache hit statistics.
That means that these demonstrations a
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:59 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK.
>
> It would be useful to have this documented in SVN somewhere.
>
We use a file called BRANCHINFO that specifies the purpose, overall
status and work items for each branch. These are kept fairly recent in
all branches. Here
OK.
It would be useful to have this documented in SVN somewhere.
I've seen this done as a STATUS file in trunk - sorry, cannot remember
now where I saw it, but we adopted it in JMeter.
On 28/11/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Similar comment for r721063 as well.
>
>
> -Rahul
>
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:05 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not saying that the tests need to be fixed for 0.9, however I
> think they need to be fixed for any subsequent release. I'm happy to
> provide patches and/or update trunk to achieve this.
>
Always great to have help :-) Oh
On 27/11/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 27, 2008, at 8:25 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > On 26/11/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 6:20 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 25/11/2008, Rahul A
Similar comment for r721063 as well.
-Rahul
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:25 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Author: sebb
>> Date: Wed Nov 26 17:25:04 2008
>> New Revision: 721061
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:25 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: sebb
> Date: Wed Nov 26 17:25:04 2008
> New Revision: 721061
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=721061&view=rev
> Log:
> Javadoc corrections
>
Thanks a lot for these fixes.
We have an active branch here [1]. Please rem
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Thi
- "Ted Dunning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Luc,
>
> Last I looked, I think I saw that commons math used a double indirect
> storage format very similar to Jama.
>
> Is there any thought to going to a higher performance layout such as
> used by
> Colt?
Yes.
The linear algebra package i
13 matches
Mail list logo
