[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Here is a discussion started with one [math] user. As a result, James proposed
to switch development back from branch MATH_2_0 to trunk (and to switch trunk
to a new 1.x branch). I agree with this suggestion but cannot be sure about how
many users will be affec
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
Distributions, key, release notes:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/scxml/0.9/RC1/
Site including clirr and rat reports (many links -- such as release
docs, some Javadoc links and images will remain broken on staging
site):
http://people.apache.org/builds/common
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 12:13 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22/11/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for going over the Findbugs list. While this is a bit of a déjà
>> vu for me ...
>>
>> http://markmail.org/message/si5kphud52ntxbqi
>>
>> ... I don't expe
On 22/11/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:19 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just thought to run Findbugs on the code.
> >
>
>
>
> Thanks for going over the Findbugs list. While this is a bit of a déjà
> vu for me ...
>
> http://markmail.or
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:19 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just thought to run Findbugs on the code.
>
Thanks for going over the Findbugs list. While this is a bit of a déjà
vu for me ...
http://markmail.org/message/si5kphud52ntxbqi
... I don't expect others to remember the discussi
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 8:46 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22/11/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I've been nudged before, but I'm OK with it being there.
>>
>
> OK by me too, so long as they are up to date, so I just ran a "maven
> test" and it completed successful
Just thought to run Findbugs on the code.
There are a lot of cases of the statement:
private Log appLog = LogFactory.getLog(...)
which appear in serializable classes.
However Log does not appear to be Serializable, so this will cause a
problem if the classes are serialised. So long as the Log f
On 22/11/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your time (some comments below).
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:51 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > All looks OK:
> > + hashes, sigs OK
> > + tar and zip archives have same contents
> > + source agrees with SV
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Thi
