To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Thi
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=115021&projectId=142
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 22 Sep 2008 16:40:01 -0700
Finished at: Mon 22 Sep 2008 16:43:30 -0700
Total time: 3m 28s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=115020&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 22 Sep 2008 16:37:48 -0700
Finished at: Mon 22 Sep 2008 16:38:46 -0700
Total time: 58s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Number:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by Mohammad Nour El Din:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Validator
--
-
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by Mohammad Nour El Din:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/GeneralInformation
New page:
'''TODO''' - MNour - Add more general information about Validat
On 22/09/2008, Oberhuber, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also, the binary jar contains an examples/ directory, but it contains
> > only the class files.
> >
> > Surely it should contain the source files instead?
>
>
> I'm not sure about best practices used in Apache Commons, but
> it see
> Also, the binary jar contains an examples/ directory, but it contains
> only the class files.
>
> Surely it should contain the source files instead?
I'm not sure about best practices used in Apache Commons, but
it seems odd to me that examples code is even found in the
binary jar.
Shouldn't th
> has anybody ever tried
>
> javac -target 1.4 -bootclasspath ${JAVA14_HOME}/lib/rt.jar
>
> on commons net 2.0?
I just did a quick check, and it looks like this question was
silly (sorry). Apparently, using java -target 1.4 also requires
java -source 1.4 which would fail due to all the Generic
Hi Rory,
thanks for taking the time putting this together.
I just notice that in the changes list, some entries
seem to be broken off unexpectedly:
"SSLServerSocketFactory. Thanks " //Thanks WHOM?
"updated MVSFTPEntryParser from " //from WHERE?
Perhaps some XML escaping is missing here?
Hi all,
sorry for reopening such an old thread, but it's the latest I've found
searching for "generics".
As James say, it is quite a pain to determine types in a generic class.
I think commons could be a good place for a library that makes this
operation easier, maybe in beanutils since its missi
10 matches
Mail list logo