On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Oberhuber, Martin
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The backward compatibility question you mention was about the
>>> suggestion to refactor the Commons
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Thi
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Oberhuber, Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The backward compatibility question you mention was about the
suggestion to refactor the Commons Net "small protocol"
implementations into separate packages each:
Oh, that was not my
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Oberhuber, Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The backward compatibility question you mention was about the
> suggestion to refactor the Commons Net "small protocol"
> implementations into separate packages each:
Oh, that was not my understanding. But since there
Thanks Niklas.
The backward compatibility question you mention was about the
suggestion to refactor the Commons Net "small protocol"
implementations into separate packages each:
> Basically there's no problem to deliver a
> commons-net-2.0-legacy.jar that contains something along
>
> package o
