On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 19:43 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I wouldn't push for a 2.0 release in the current state, I'm not
> convinced by the design of the new API. It seems more reasonable to
> stabilize the 1.x branch before considering a major refactoring with CLI2.
Given that there is no rus
I wouldn't push for a 2.0 release in the current state, I'm not
convinced by the design of the new API. It seems more reasonable to
stabilize the 1.x branch before considering a major refactoring with CLI2.
Emmanuel Bourg
Niall Pemberton a écrit :
I saw from the following blog[1] that Hadoop
Henri Yandell a écrit :
Looks like a 1.2 is ready to release. At least there are no open
issues related to 1.x.
I agree, at this point we need more feedback on the changes applied
recently from the main projects using CLI. The documentation
improvements would be great but that should not blo
Russel Winder wrote:
On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 16:02 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote:
I saw from the following blog[1] that Hadoop is using CLI
2.0-SNAPSHOT, but they're considering rolling back (HADOOP-3676[2])
because of the uncertainty wrt CLI 2.0. Seems the most recent
discussion was inconclusive:
