Hi Rahoul,
not sure if I understand what you mean
+) the underlying Ant code is mature
+) commons-exec is currently used as various snapshot versions
+) then users are aware that commons-exec is a sandbox project
+)
How would you like to see the statement?
Siegfried Goeschl
Rahul A
Mauro Talevi wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
Yes, and I would distinguish performance optimization from numerical
accuracy. From my perspective, we can release a ".0" with room for
performance improvement, but at least decent numerics are required.
I agree that decent numerics are required. I'm
+1
If you do roll another RC, it would be good to fix a little typo on the
building page: s/io/jxpath in a couple of places. This should be fixed
before deploying the site, in any case.
Builds, sigs, jar contents, etc. all check out fine. I only tested the
Ant and m2 builds.
Phil
Thank
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> One of the task scheduled for 2.0 is the implementation of the Singular
>>> Value Decomposition.
>>>
>>> I think this addition should be done together with several other
>>> decompositions in a consistent scheme. What we have cu
On 14/06/2008, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Artifacts look very good. I also ran the tests for
> > commons configuration
> > with the new version successfully.
> >
> > The only thing that makes me a bit uneasy is the
Matt Benson schrieb:
--- Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Artifacts look very good. I also ran the tests for
commons configuration
with the new version successfully.
The only thing that makes me a bit uneasy is the
findbugs report showing
133 errors. Did you have a look at those?
Phil Steitz wrote:
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
One of the task scheduled for 2.0 is the implementation of the Singular
Value Decomposition.
I think this addition should be done together with several other
decompositions in a consistent scheme. What we have currently is:
- LU decomposition embedded d
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a JIRA item for using generics, and another
> for varargs. Additionally it'd probably be nice to
> use generics-level reflection in the oacl.reflect
> package. Thoughts on [lang] 3.0 moving to Java 5
> source level
--- Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> Artifacts look very good. I also ran the tests for
> commons configuration
> with the new version successfully.
>
> The only thing that makes me a bit uneasy is the
> findbugs report showing
> 133 errors. Did you have a look at those?
>
I
+1
Artifacts look very good. I also ran the tests for commons configuration
with the new version successfully.
The only thing that makes me a bit uneasy is the findbugs report showing
133 errors. Did you have a look at those?
Oliver
Matt Benson schrieb:
Thanks to anyone who reported issue
--- Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/13/08, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I'll mention this on the wiki if I remember
> beyond the jet lag.
> >
>
>
> Done.
:)
>
> -Rahul
>
>
-
> To un
On 6/13/08, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'll mention this on the wiki if I remember beyond the jet lag.
>
Done.
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases
The comment on the change is:
Comments about the staging URL for the RC & not updat
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases
The comment on the change is:
Move note about repositories in rc profile towards th
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
> there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
> commons-exec to commons proper?!
As someone partially to blame for the code
15 matches
Mail list logo