Re: [exec] svn commit: r667505 - /commons/sandbox/exec/trunk/src/site/fml/faq.fml

2008-06-14 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi Rahoul, not sure if I understand what you mean +) the underlying Ant code is mature +) commons-exec is currently used as various snapshot versions +) then users are aware that commons-exec is a sandbox project +) How would you like to see the statement? Siegfried Goeschl Rahul A

Re: [math] Improving numerics in OLSMultipleLinearRegression

2008-06-14 Thread Phil Steitz
Mauro Talevi wrote: Phil Steitz wrote: Yes, and I would distinguish performance optimization from numerical accuracy. From my perspective, we can release a ".0" with room for performance improvement, but at least decent numerics are required. I agree that decent numerics are required. I'm

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC3

2008-06-14 Thread Phil Steitz
+1 If you do roll another RC, it would be good to fix a little typo on the building page: s/io/jxpath in a couple of places. This should be fixed before deploying the site, in any case. Builds, sigs, jar contents, etc. all check out fine. I only tested the Ant and m2 builds. Phil Thank

Re: [math] linear algebra decomposition algorithms (SVD, Cholesky, QR, LU, eigen values ...)

2008-06-14 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Phil Steitz a écrit : > Phil Steitz wrote: >> Luc Maisonobe wrote: >>> One of the task scheduled for 2.0 is the implementation of the Singular >>> Value Decomposition. >>> >>> I think this addition should be done together with several other >>> decompositions in a consistent scheme. What we have cu

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC3

2008-06-14 Thread sebb
On 14/06/2008, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Artifacts look very good. I also ran the tests for > > commons configuration > > with the new version successfully. > > > > The only thing that makes me a bit uneasy is the

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC3

2008-06-14 Thread Oliver Heger
Matt Benson schrieb: --- Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 Artifacts look very good. I also ran the tests for commons configuration with the new version successfully. The only thing that makes me a bit uneasy is the findbugs report showing 133 errors. Did you have a look at those?

Re: [math] linear algebra decomposition algorithms (SVD, Cholesky, QR, LU, eigen values ...)

2008-06-14 Thread Phil Steitz
Phil Steitz wrote: Luc Maisonobe wrote: One of the task scheduled for 2.0 is the implementation of the Singular Value Decomposition. I think this addition should be done together with several other decompositions in a consistent scheme. What we have currently is: - LU decomposition embedded d

Re: [lang] Java 5

2008-06-14 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a JIRA item for using generics, and another > for varargs. Additionally it'd probably be nice to > use generics-level reflection in the oacl.reflect > package. Thoughts on [lang] 3.0 moving to Java 5 > source level

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC3

2008-06-14 Thread Matt Benson
--- Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > Artifacts look very good. I also ran the tests for > commons configuration > with the new version successfully. > > The only thing that makes me a bit uneasy is the > findbugs report showing > 133 errors. Did you have a look at those? > I

Re: [VOTE] Release JXPath 1.3 based on RC3

2008-06-14 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Artifacts look very good. I also ran the tests for commons configuration with the new version successfully. The only thing that makes me a bit uneasy is the findbugs report showing 133 errors. Did you have a look at those? Oliver Matt Benson schrieb: Thanks to anyone who reported issue

Re: RC attempts

2008-06-14 Thread Matt Benson
--- Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/13/08, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > I'll mention this on the wiki if I remember > beyond the jet lag. > > > > > Done. :) > > -Rahul > > - > To un

Re: RC attempts

2008-06-14 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 6/13/08, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll mention this on the wiki if I remember beyond the jet lag. > Done. -Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE

[Commons Wiki] Update of "CreatingReleases" by RahulAkolkar

2008-06-14 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases The comment on the change is: Comments about the staging URL for the RC & not updat

[Commons Wiki] Trivial Update of "CreatingReleases" by RahulAkolkar

2008-06-14 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases The comment on the change is: Move note about repositories in rc profile towards th

Re: [exec] Proposal - Moving commons-exec from sandbox to proper

2008-06-14 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Siegfried Goeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN > there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving > commons-exec to commons proper?! As someone partially to blame for the code