Re: Commons Net 1.5 / 2.0 Releases

2008-05-21 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I meant to say "out of the project". It was moved to test/ after the > discussion. Great, so it seems we agree :-) However, the class is still in src/main, not in src/test: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/ne

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC2

2008-05-21 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 5/21/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [X] +1 I support this release > [ ] +0 I am OK with this release > [ ] -0 OK, but > [ ] -1 I do not support this release > Sigs, sums, manifests I checked are good. Tried all builds on JDK 1.6. -Rahul -

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 5/21/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +0 > > > > We should upgrade all of our own dependencies to the latest ones when > > making releases, as far as possible. Especially the bottom tier ones > > l

[VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC2

2008-05-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
The main changes since RC1 are that the ant build now works on JDK 1.3 and the Logging dependency has been upgraded to the latest 1.1.1 The artifacts are here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/chain_1_2_RC2/ SVN Tag: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/chain/tags/CHAIN_1_2_RC2/ Site: htt

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
This vote is cancelled, I'll prepare an new RC shortly to fix some of the issues Rahul and Sebb raised. Thanks for the feedback Niall On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to do a bug fix release of Commons Chain - mainly to > release the fix

Re: [math] Sparse Matrix Support

2008-05-21 Thread John Iacona
This is the book I was referring to http://www.ec-securehost.com/SIAM/FA02.html Regards, John On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey John > > Which book are you referring to? > > Also, take a look at the matrix classes in the Apache Mahout project - I > be

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:09 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:52 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Not sure if this should be regarded as a problem or not, but I get a >> test failure when using IBM Java: >> >> java version "1.6.0" >> Java(TM) SE Runti

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:52 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure if this should be regarded as a problem or not, but I get a > test failure when using IBM Java: > > java version "1.6.0" > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pwi3260-20071123_01) > IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, J2RE 1.6.0 IBM J

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Paul Benedict
Perhaps the Serializations should be looked at. Most web app servers serialize all their info out when restarting. +1 on the release, btw Paul On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:52 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure if this should be regarded as a problem or not, but I get a > test failure w

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread sebb
Not sure if this should be regarded as a problem or not, but I get a test failure when using IBM Java: java version "1.6.0" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pwi3260-20071123_01) IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, J2RE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Windows XP x86-32 jvmwi3260-20071121_15015 (JIT enabled) J9VM - 200711

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +0 > > We should upgrade all of our own dependencies to the latest ones when > making releases, as far as possible. Especially the bottom tier ones > like logging (in this case, to 1.1.1, which contains good number of > fi

Re: Commons Net 1.5 / 2.0 Releases

2008-05-21 Thread Rory Winston
Sorry Niklas I meant to say "out of the project". It was moved to test/ after the discussion. Rory Niklas Gustavsson wrote: On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We've had this discussion already (at great length). It's not going to test/src. Sea

Re: [math] Sparse Matrix Support

2008-05-21 Thread Rory Winston
Hey John Which book are you referring to? Also, take a look at the matrix classes in the Apache Mahout project - I believe (though dont quote me on it) that they may have some support for sparse matrices. Cheers Rory John Iacona wrote: I noticed that support for sparse matrix computation w

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons IO - Build Def:

2008-05-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=91734&projectId=155 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Wed 21 May 2008 14:01:33 -0700 Finished at: Wed 21 May 2008 14:02:26 -0700 Total time: 52s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Number

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:42 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:05 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:26 AM, s

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread sebb
On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:05 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:26 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Rahul Akolkar
+0 We should upgrade all of our own dependencies to the latest ones when making releases, as far as possible. Especially the bottom tier ones like logging (in this case, to 1.1.1, which contains good number of fixes over 1.0.4). As indicated by my vote, I don't consider this to be a blocker. Eve

[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons - Commons IO - Build Def:

2008-05-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=91682&projectId=155 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Failed Started at: Wed 21 May 2008 10:36:08 -0700 Finished at: Wed 21 May 2008 10:37:05 -0700 Total time: 56s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Number

Re: [vfs] vfs2 or plain wrapper mode

2008-05-21 Thread Jeffrey Brekke
> * [X ] Do you agree that such an evolution might make sense > * and if so, should I > ** [ ] add a VFS-global (static) flag to enable this wrapper-like-mode or > ** [X ] can I fork VFS to put the current head into maintainance (or more > correct "dormant") mode and start with e.g. VFS 2.0? > --

RE: Commons Net 1.5 / 2.0 Releases

2008-05-21 Thread Oberhuber, Martin
Hi Jörg, Good point -- but in my environment (Eclipse), transitive Deps are a non-issue since OSGi provides multiple classloaders So I can live with ACN 1.5 and 2.0 at the same time even if They have mutually incompatible implementations of the same Class in the same namespace. I'd rather like to

[math] Sparse Matrix Support

2008-05-21 Thread John Iacona
I noticed that support for sparse matrix computation was on the commons math wishlist. This is a project I would be interested in taking on. I would like to add a SparseMatrix interface which would support functionality analogous to the RealMatrix interface. I have worked with Tim Davis the author

RE: [vfs] vfs2 or plain wrapper mode

2008-05-21 Thread Jörg Schaible
Mario Ivankovits wrote: [snip] > So, my questions are: > * [X] Do you agree that such an evolution might make sense > * and if so, should I > ** [ ] add a VFS-global (static) flag to enable this > wrapper-like-mode or > ** [X] can I fork VFS to put the current head into > maintainance (or more > c

Re: apache commons net

2008-05-21 Thread James Carman
Name it something different during upload. When it's finished, do a rename. For instance, while you're uploading, name the file myfile.uploading and then when it's done, just rename it to myfile. On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:57 AM, bperquku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have a simpl

apache commons net

2008-05-21 Thread bperquku
Hi all, I have a simple java applicatoion, that uploads a file in a computer server (aix). In the server another process checks for that file, processes it, and deletes it. Is there any possible way to set a lock in file that will be uploaded, because if the file size is big ex. 200 MB the proc

Re: [vfs] vfs2 or plain wrapper mode

2008-05-21 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! > Sounds like your > solution would work for directories as well, if VFS didn't attempt to > enumerate all the files in all the directories along the path? > Yes, that is the plan :-) What I wrote about files count for directories too, for me this attribute is just a different value ;-) Cia

Re: [vfs] vfs2 or plain wrapper mode

2008-05-21 Thread Jeffrey Brekke
We also have the situation where the directories are also hidden. So we need to be able to traverse hidden directories as well. Sounds like your solution would work for directories as well, if VFS didn't attempt to enumerate all the files in all the directories along the path? On Wed, May 21, 20

Re: [vfs] vfs2 or plain wrapper mode

2008-05-21 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi Martin! > Just wondering, how would a client of VFS enumerate > Just the folders in a directory e.g. in order to > Render a tree of files? > As today. Disabling the file-type determination should be optional only and isn't something I'd change during the first development iteration. The diff

Re: [vfs] vfs2 or plain wrapper mode

2008-05-21 Thread Filip Defoort
Hi Mario, On 5/21/08, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, my questions are: > * [ ] Do you agree that such an evolution might make sense > * and if so, should I > ** [ ] add a VFS-global (static) flag to enable this wrapper-like-mode or > ** [ ] can I fork VFS to put the current head

RE: [vfs] vfs2 or plain wrapper mode

2008-05-21 Thread Oberhuber, Martin
Hi Mario, Just wondering, how would a client of VFS enumerate Just the folders in a directory e.g. in order to Render a tree of files? He needs to know here what items are folders and What items are files (which gets more difficulte When symbolic links with file-flavor or folder-flavor Are involv

[vfs] vfs2 or plain wrapper mode

2008-05-21 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! Probably I find some time during the next weekend to fix a long standig bug in VFS regarding dealing with hidden or special files. The main problem I see is that VFS tries to act more like a real filesystem than a simple wrapper. VFS tries to determine the filetype (FILE, DIR, VIRTUAL) and th

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:05 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:26 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I would like to do a bug fix relea

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread sebb
On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:26 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I would like to do a bug fix release of Commons Chain - mainly to > >> release the fix for CHAIN-33[1]

Re: Commons Net 1.5 / 2.0 Releases

2008-05-21 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've had this discussion already (at great length). It's not going to > test/src. Search through the archives, I managed to find a discussion on this very topic from March this year, however in the thread it seems like yo

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:26 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I would like to do a bug fix release of Commons Chain - mainly to >> release the fix for CHAIN-33[1] - which hit a Struts user recently >> (see STR-3143[2]) - but there