On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:11 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Well, I am wondering if this really is a "common" need th
Well, I am wondering if this really is a "common" need that should
go into
the commons project. We already have "math".
If it doesn't fit in there it might well be better of to get it
into labs
IMO - not commons.
I would say the same could apply to many commons or commons-sandbox
compone
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:11 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, I am wondering if this really is a "common" need that should go into
> > the commons project. We already have "math".
> > If it doesn'
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I am wondering if this really is a "common" need that should go into
> the commons project. We already have "math".
> If it doesn't fit in there it might well be better of to get it into labs
> IMO - not commons.
>
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The existing implementation is not yet ready for production. A lot of work
> has been done, but there are many missing features. [nabla] can handle
> simple functions from end to end (i.e. up to creating an instance of
The existing implementation is not yet ready for production. A lot
of work has been done, but there are many missing features. [nabla]
can handle simple functions from end to end (i.e. up to creating an
instance of the differentiated class that is fully functional).
Making this code availab
Oliver Heger a écrit :
The main reason for the restructuring of the packages was to increase
modularity, which is especially important in environments like OSGi
where you have fine control over the packages to import. An "all
configurations in the main package" approach won't help here.
By "in
Is Jakarta essentially dead? I thought Jakarta was the place for all
things Java at the ASF. That's where the "regular" commons project
started out. It makes sense to me that the JME (J2ME whatever)
commons project would start there.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Ramiro Pereira de Magalhaes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As my CS graduation I wrote a GA framework to help me solve the problem I
> was proposing. It is implemented, may need some improvements with a less
> naive and optimized code, but it works fine. I wrote less i
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Brent Worden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The code is checked in.
>
Thanks, Brent, and sorry for the delay getting back to this. I have
been playing with some implementations and developing some test cases.
I will check in what I have in the next couple of days.
N
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Ramiro Pereira de Magalhaes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As my CS graduation I wrote a GA framework to help me solve the problem I
> was proposing. It is implemented, may need some improvements with a less
> naive and optimized code, but it works fine. I wrote less i
+1 to the proposal..
Don't know if I will ever get around to helping though..
Mvgr,
Martin
Nick Burch wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I've been chatting to a few people at ApacheCon about a j2me commons, and
> they suggested I bring the idea to the dev list.
>
> My idea was to have a commons library that i
lol :)
Mvgr,
Martin
James Carman wrote:
> How about this goes into Jakarta?
>
>
>
> On 4/10/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Nick Burch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have played with an idea for a new project for a few months. Asking for a
> few advices both at the ApacheCon Europe and by direct contact, all
> responses I received were quite positive and suggested me to s
My first reaction is that I have absolutely no idea what you are talking
about. ;-)
My secondary reaction is to wonder how many people out there do understand
it, and of them, how many would contribute to its development. One of the
entry criteria, from my perspective, is some reasonable chance th
Hello,
I have played with an idea for a new project for a few months. Asking
for a few advices both at the ApacheCon Europe and by direct contact,
all responses I received were quite positive and suggested me to set up
a component in sandbox. This message is the first public announcement
and
Should escapeJavaScript really being escaping forward slashes
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-363)? I know a user
reported an issue with this, but the new behavior seems to break all
sorts of code on my end. For instance,
if I am passing some text, that contains a URL and might con
2008/4/13, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So, does anyone have any strong opinions about the name? I am
> thinking that I should just pick one (not "expression") and just go
> with it. If I change the name, I'll likely change the interface names
> to match. Anyone?
What about "commons-e
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to release version 5 of the commons-sandbox-parent pom -
> > there are two changes since the last release:
> >
> > - upgrade it to use version 9 of commons-parent
> > - r
Niall Pemberton wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release version 5 of the commons-sandbox-parent pom -
there are two changes since the last release:
- upgrade it to use version 9 of commons-parent
- remove the taglist-maven-plugin because of the MTAGLIST-31 bug:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MTAGLIS
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
21 matches
Mail list logo