Re: [all][nabla] proposition for a new project in sandbox

2008-04-13 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:11 PM, James Carman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Well, I am wondering if this really is a "common" need th

Re: [all][nabla] proposition for a new project in sandbox

2008-04-13 Thread Torsten Curdt
Well, I am wondering if this really is a "common" need that should go into the commons project. We already have "math". If it doesn't fit in there it might well be better of to get it into labs IMO - not commons. I would say the same could apply to many commons or commons-sandbox compone

Re: [all][nabla] proposition for a new project in sandbox

2008-04-13 Thread Phil Steitz
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:11 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well, I am wondering if this really is a "common" need that should go into > > the commons project. We already have "math". > > If it doesn'

Re: [all][nabla] proposition for a new project in sandbox

2008-04-13 Thread James Carman
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I am wondering if this really is a "common" need that should go into > the commons project. We already have "math". > If it doesn't fit in there it might well be better of to get it into labs > IMO - not commons. >

Re: [all][nabla] proposition for a new project in sandbox

2008-04-13 Thread Phil Steitz
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The existing implementation is not yet ready for production. A lot of work > has been done, but there are many missing features. [nabla] can handle > simple functions from end to end (i.e. up to creating an instance of

Re: [all][nabla] proposition for a new project in sandbox

2008-04-13 Thread Torsten Curdt
The existing implementation is not yet ready for production. A lot of work has been done, but there are many missing features. [nabla] can handle simple functions from end to end (i.e. up to creating an instance of the differentiated class that is fully functional). Making this code availab

Re: [configuration] New hierarchical configurations

2008-04-13 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Oliver Heger a écrit : The main reason for the restructuring of the packages was to increase modularity, which is especially important in environments like OSGi where you have fine control over the packages to import. An "all configurations in the main package" approach won't help here. By "in

Re: j2me commons?

2008-04-13 Thread James Carman
Is Jakarta essentially dead? I thought Jakarta was the place for all things Java at the ASF. That's where the "regular" commons project started out. It makes sense to me that the JME (J2ME whatever) commons project would start there. On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL

Res: [math] Genetic Algorithms

2008-04-13 Thread Ramiro Pereira de Magalhães
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Ramiro Pereira de Magalhaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As my CS graduation I wrote a GA framework to help me solve the problem I > was proposing. It is implemented, may need some improvements with a less > naive and optimized code, but it works fine. I wrote less i

Re: [math] Genetic Algorithms

2008-04-13 Thread Phil Steitz
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Brent Worden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The code is checked in. > Thanks, Brent, and sorry for the delay getting back to this. I have been playing with some implementations and developing some test cases. I will check in what I have in the next couple of days. N

Re: [math] Genetic Algorithms

2008-04-13 Thread Phil Steitz
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Ramiro Pereira de Magalhaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As my CS graduation I wrote a GA framework to help me solve the problem I > was proposing. It is implemented, may need some improvements with a less > naive and optimized code, but it works fine. I wrote less i

Re: j2me commons?

2008-04-13 Thread Martin van den Bemt
+1 to the proposal.. Don't know if I will ever get around to helping though.. Mvgr, Martin Nick Burch wrote: > Hi All > > I've been chatting to a few people at ApacheCon about a j2me commons, and > they suggested I bring the idea to the dev list. > > My idea was to have a commons library that i

Re: j2me commons?

2008-04-13 Thread Martin van den Bemt
lol :) Mvgr, Martin James Carman wrote: > How about this goes into Jakarta? > > > > On 4/10/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Nick Burch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: [all][nabla] proposition for a new project in sandbox

2008-04-13 Thread Phil Steitz
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I have played with an idea for a new project for a few months. Asking for a > few advices both at the ApacheCon Europe and by direct contact, all > responses I received were quite positive and suggested me to s

Re: [all][nabla] proposition for a new project in sandbox

2008-04-13 Thread Martin Cooper
My first reaction is that I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. ;-) My secondary reaction is to wonder how many people out there do understand it, and of them, how many would contribute to its development. One of the entry criteria, from my perspective, is some reasonable chance th

[all][nabla] proposition for a new project in sandbox

2008-04-13 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hello, I have played with an idea for a new project for a few months. Asking for a few advices both at the ApacheCon Europe and by direct contact, all responses I received were quite positive and suggested me to set up a component in sandbox. This message is the first public announcement and

escapeJavaScript and LANG-363

2008-04-13 Thread Michael Giles
Should escapeJavaScript really being escaping forward slashes (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-363)? I know a user reported an issue with this, but the new behavior seems to break all sorts of code on my end. For instance, if I am passing some text, that contains a URL and might con

Re: [DISCUSS] New Expressions Sandbox Project...

2008-04-13 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2008/4/13, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > So, does anyone have any strong opinions about the name? I am > thinking that I should just pick one (not "expression") and just go > with it. If I change the name, I'll likely change the interface names > to match. Anyone? What about "commons-e

Re: [VOTE] Relase Version 5 of commons-sandbox-parent

2008-04-13 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to release version 5 of the commons-sandbox-parent pom - > > there are two changes since the last release: > > > > - upgrade it to use version 9 of commons-parent > > - r

Re: [VOTE] Relase Version 5 of commons-sandbox-parent

2008-04-13 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Niall Pemberton wrote: Hi, I'd like to release version 5 of the commons-sandbox-parent pom - there are two changes since the last release: - upgrade it to use version 9 of commons-parent - remove the taglist-maven-plugin because of the MTAGLIST-31 bug: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MTAGLIS

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

2008-04-13 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jaxme development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration. This