So, does anyone have any strong opinions about the name? I am
thinking that I should just pick one (not "expression") and just go
with it. If I change the name, I'll likely change the interface names
to match. Anyone?
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 7:22 AM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Oliver Heger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> Artifacts look good.
>
> On the site I found that the Javadoc (3.2.1 release) link in the main
> menue does not work, but I assume it will when the site is deployed.
Yes, just maven screwing up with relative links
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 4:50 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
:)
> BTW a check of SVN recommended:
>
> svn ps svn:eol-style native
>
> COLLECTIONS_3_2_1_RC1/src/test/org/apache/commons/collections/map/TestMultiValueMap.java
Fixed in the branch, thanks
Niall
> S///
>
>
> On 12/04/2
Sorry, I hadn't committed the change to commons-parent-9 - now done
and the correct URL showing the changes is
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-sandbox-parent/trunk/pom.xml?r1=647511&r2=632874&diff_format=h
Niall
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
I'd like to release version 5 of the commons-sandbox-parent pom -
there are two changes since the last release:
- upgrade it to use version 9 of commons-parent
- remove the taglist-maven-plugin because of the MTAGLIST-31 bug:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MTAGLIST-31
There have been no
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That pretty much sums it up. Niall? :)
Looks like its being caused by a bug in the taglist plugin - I've
raised an issue ticket for it here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MTAGLIST-31
Fortunately that plugin is only in
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=76278&projectId=178
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Sat 12 Apr 2008 15:30:37 -0700
Finished at: Sat 12 Apr 2008 15:31:56 -0700
Total time: 1m 18s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Num
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=76278&projectId=178
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Sat 12 Apr 2008 15:30:37 -0700
Finished at: Sat 12 Apr 2008 15:31:56 -0700
Total time: 1m 18s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Num
sebb wrote:
On 06/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems that the Reply-to header for commons list still contains a
reference to
> Jakarta. I first thought my client badly rewrote this, but now I
think the
> header is already set up like this from the beg
+1
BTW a check of SVN recommended:
svn ps svn:eol-style native
COLLECTIONS_3_2_1_RC1/src/test/org/apache/commons/collections/map/TestMultiValueMap.java
S///
On 12/04/2008, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> Artifacts look good.
>
> On the site I found that the Javadoc (3.2.1 rele
On 12/04/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 4:21 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/04/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:18 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 12/04/20
+1
Artifacts look good.
On the site I found that the Javadoc (3.2.1 release) link in the main
menue does not work, but I assume it will when the site is deployed.
Oliver
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> The Sling project has requested an OSGi enabled release of Commons
> Collections and since it seems
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 4:21 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 12/04/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:18 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 12/04/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Apr 12, 2
On 12/04/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:18 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/04/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 1:25 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 12/04/2008, Niall P
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:18 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 12/04/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 1:25 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 12/04/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > The Sling project has req
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Oliver Heger a écrit :
>
>>> XMLConfiguration and XMLPropertiesConfiguration remain in the main
>>> package.
>>
>> Why?
>
>
> The purpose of the package is to group only the SAX readers as they form
> a hierarchy providing a specific feature, just like the BeanUtils brid
On 12/04/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 1:25 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/04/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The Sling project has requested an OSGi enabled release of Commons
> > > Collections and since it se
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Stephen Colebourne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe that this is a Java 1.4 specific method. Are we OK with that?
Yes the current trunk requires a minimum of JDK 1.5
Niall
> Stephen
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > -urls[i] = files[i].toU
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 1:25 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/04/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Sling project has requested an OSGi enabled release of Commons
> > Collections and since it seems unlikely that Collections 3.3 will be
> > ready in the timescal
On 12/04/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Sling project has requested an OSGi enabled release of Commons
> Collections and since it seems unlikely that Collections 3.3 will be
> ready in the timescale they require, I have created a release
> candidate for Collections 3.2.1.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:29 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Other interesting ideas:
>
> MethodPath - you're recording a path through objects via methods calls.
> MethodWalker - you're walking a series of method calls.
> Navigator - you're navigating through a graph of objects.
>
I believe that this is a Java 1.4 specific method. Are we OK with that?
Stephen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-urls[i] = files[i].toURL();
+urls[i] = files[i].toURI().toURL();
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
23 matches
Mail list logo
