Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:29 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hmm, what about "graphmacro"? Have to be careful with
>>> "graph" though: without "object" it may be
>>> interpreted
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 6:45 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perhaps we could ask for an "Apache Commons
> > Fastrack" process as part of the Incubator?
>
> Definitely the aim here I think.
Replying
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 6:45 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What would make a project become an Apache Commons Incubator "podling"
> vs. an Apache Commons Sandbox project?
New code -> Sandbox.
Existing code outside Apache -> Incubator.
> Is that something we decide on
> a case-b
Selon Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I suggest we let Nick have a go at it.
+1
Luc
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What would make a project become an Apache Commons Incubator "podling"
vs. an Apache Commons Sandbox project? Is that something we decide on
a case-by-case basis? Perhaps we could just better formalize the
sandbox's charter so that maybe we flag projects as "donated" rather
than "grown" inside th
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The first-class Expression object encapsulates the specifics of the
> > implementation (whether it be a String or some Serializable object or
> > whatever). This way, you just code to the commons-expression API
> > (
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:29 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmm, what about "graphmacro"? Have to be careful with
> > "graph" though: without "object" it may be
> > interpreted wrongly. "beanmacro"?
> >
No :)
[Damn.. I have to justify that? What happened to "Because I said
so" "Because it's hot and will hurt" gah]
Jakarta's on the way out as it's a disjoint umbrella. Commons is a
joint umbrella [erm... maybe I can't abuse English that way...
overlapping umbrella] and is the way of the fu
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:46 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I don't know about this API. The idea behind [expression] is that
> > > it's not necessarily string-based (a lot of the impls are, but the
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=75628&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Thu 10 Apr 2008 16:52:41 -0700
Finished at: Thu 10 Apr 2008 16:54:00 -0700
Total time: 1m 18s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Num
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=75628&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Thu 10 Apr 2008 16:52:41 -0700
Finished at: Thu 10 Apr 2008 16:54:00 -0700
Total time: 1m 18s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Num
Feedback sought!
-Matt
--- Apache Wiki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Wiki user,
>
> You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category
> on "Commons Wiki" for change notification.
>
> The following page has been changed by MattBenson:
>
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsIncubatorPropo
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by MattBenson:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsIncubatorProposal
The comment on the change is:
Initial proposal for a Commons Incubator
New p
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1, good thinking. If things scope grows too large, they can always go
> upwards. It's much harder for an Incubator project or TLP to discover
> it was in fact too small and go downwards. As Nick's a committer,
> let's
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Nick Burch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All
> > >
> > > I've been chatting to a few people
How about this goes into Jakarta?
On 4/10/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Nick Burch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All
> > >
> > > I've been chatting to a
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Nick Burch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi All
> >
> > I've been chatting to a few people at ApacheCon about a j2me commons, and
> > they suggested I bring the idea to the dev list.
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=75547&projectId=538
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 10 Apr 2008 12:08:25 -0700
Finished at: Thu 10 Apr 2008 12:08:57 -0700
Total time: 32s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Number
On 10/04/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: sgoeschl
> Date: Thu Apr 10 11:02:21 2008
> New Revision: 646903
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=646903&view=rev
> Log:
> Adding a page to collect the sucesses/failures for various operating systems
> and jvm vers
On 10/04/2008, Siegfried Goeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
>
> > But that does not work on e.g. FreeBSD.
> >
> > Indeed the code will now just create an ever-larger file, not print
> > ... to the screen
> >
>
> +) printing the funny dots was just something I ommited to delete - I wan
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, what about "graphmacro"? Have to be careful with
> "graph" though: without "object" it may be
> interpreted wrongly. "beanmacro"?
>
Other interesting ideas:
MethodPath - you're recording a path through objects via
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Without having looked at the code, I'm not
> understanding why [proxy] would be a "first-class"
> dependency. Seems like it would be optional depending
> on whether a client of [expression?] wanted to use the
> recordi
Hmm, what about "graphmacro"? Have to be careful with
"graph" though: without "object" it may be
interpreted wrongly. "beanmacro"?
-Matt
--- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:59 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:46 PM
--- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Rahul Akolkar
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I don't know about this API. The idea behind
> [expression] is that
> > > it's not necessarily string-based (a lot of the
> impls are, but the
> > > Javassist on
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:59 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:46 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If people feel that [expression] isn't the right name for what I've
> > come up with, I don't really care (as I said, what's in a name). Bu
Hi Sebb,
But that does not work on e.g. FreeBSD.
Indeed the code will now just create an ever-larger file, not print
... to the screen
+) printing the funny dots was just something I ommited to delete - I
want to make a verification to ensure that the script was executed
successfully by ens
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:46 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If people feel that [expression] isn't the right name for what I've
> come up with, I don't really care (as I said, what's in a name). But,
> the idea of an expression just fit in my mind. I'll try to come up
> with so
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't know about this API. The idea behind [expression] is that
> > it's not necessarily string-based (a lot of the impls are, but the
> > Javassist one wouldn't be; it'll probably only be available via
> > build
On 10/04/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: sgoeschl
> Date: Thu Apr 10 08:22:17 2008
> New Revision: 646842
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=646842&view=rev
> Log:
> Changed the usage of the echo statement to work with HP-UX (thanks to sebb)
>
> Modified:
>
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Nick Burch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I've been chatting to a few people at ApacheCon about a j2me commons, and
> they suggested I bring the idea to the dev list.
>
I'm one of those people.
> My idea was to have a commons library that implemented a
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:21 AM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > (1) The proposed API feels like [objectgraphnavigation] rather than
> > [expression], which is an interesting subset of expressions, but
>
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, James Carman wrote:
> That sounds more like something that would be a top-level-project,
> IMHO.
Possibly much longer term, if there was the interest to sustain it!
> I could see multiple modules in something like J2ME Commons. I'm sure
> there isn't a standard set of "things
That sounds more like something that would be a top-level-project,
IMHO. I could see multiple modules in something like J2ME Commons.
I'm sure there isn't a standard set of "things you want to do for
j2me." I would assume (having never written for the J2ME platform)
that there are various categor
Hi All
I've been chatting to a few people at ApacheCon about a j2me commons, and
they suggested I bring the idea to the dev list.
My idea was to have a commons library that implemented all the common
things you want to do for j2me, which have annoyingly been missed out of
the j2me spec, or are qu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=75465&projectId=538
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Thu 10 Apr 2008 06:44:30 -0700
Finished at: Thu 10 Apr 2008 06:45:04 -0700
Total time: 34s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Number
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=75465&projectId=538
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Thu 10 Apr 2008 06:44:30 -0700
Finished at: Thu 10 Apr 2008 06:45:04 -0700
Total time: 34s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Number
data/test/NullComparator.version2.obj1
data/test/NullComparator.version2.obj2
seem to be versions of .obj files.
it's a bit confusing to create new file types - and it messes up
various settings and tools - so could these be renamed as .obj, but
with a different stem? Or are the different extensi
svn ps svn:eol-style native
src/test/org/apache/commons/collections/map/TestMultiValueMap.java
Needs to be done in trunk; perhaps also in active branches.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mai
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I support this and would like to work on it.
>
That's great! I would love to have some help/input on this.
> Thanks a lot, this is great. I was lost reading the emails in this
> thread but the code has made things
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:18 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:47 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, does anyone object to me putting this code into the sandbox?
No, I support this and would like to work on it.
> > I've
> > got working ve
On 10/04/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: sgoeschl
> Date: Thu Apr 10 01:53:36 2008
> New Revision: 646693
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=646693&view=rev
> Log:
> Creating a proper name for test distribution, e.g.
> exec-test-1.0-SNAPSHOT.zip't
Some hos
Oliver Heger a écrit :
XMLConfiguration and XMLPropertiesConfiguration remain in the main
package.
Why?
The purpose of the package is to group only the SAX readers as they form
a hierarchy providing a specific feature, just like the BeanUtils bridge
in the beanutils package. I don't know i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
-List list = PropertyConverter.split((String) value,
getListDelimiter());
+List list = PropertyConverter.split((String) value,
+getListDelimiter());
Oliver, could you increase the line length setting of your IDE to 120
p
43 matches
Mail list logo