On 3/27/08, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello fellow developers,
>
> this component cannot be built anymore because Jaxme has too much
> evolved... and I'm afraid I know no-one that can upgrade jelly-jaxme
> for this. I already asked the original developer without success.
> May
On 3/27/08, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 4:33 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> > On 27/03/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
On 3/27/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 7:33 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It should be obvious that code uploaded to a personal user directory
> > has not been formally released.
> >
> > If a shared repository is used then this is less obvious
On 3/27/08, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/22/08, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008
On 3/25/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25/03/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/24/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I think someone needs to turn this thread into a document so it does
> > > not get lost ...
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
Hi Naill, Simon and All...
I've sent the Sandbox committer access request. Here it is
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel/102683
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mohammed,
>
> To clarify, the process Niall recommended is
Hi All...
As per this thread -
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel/102655 - I
contacted the development team of Apache Commons Validator -
http://commons.apache.org/validator/ - to discuss with them the
importance of implementing the Bean Validation JSR#303 -
http://jcp.org/
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 4:33 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 27/03/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 3/22/08, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Mar 22, 200
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 7:33 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It should be obvious that code uploaded to a personal user directory
> has not been formally released.
>
> If a shared repository is used then this is less obvious, and there is
> a risk that users will assume that it is a relea
Hello fellow developers,
this component cannot be built anymore because Jaxme has too much
evolved... and I'm afraid I know no-one that can upgrade jelly-jaxme
for this. I already asked the original developer without success.
Maybe it is simpler to remove it from gump which always works with
Oberhuber, Martin skrev den 26-03-2008 13:31:
This must be nonstandard.
I could not find any reference to "TYPE C" or "TYPE Z"
in the RFCs, or other references linked from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Transfer_Protocol
What products support "TYPE Z" ?
The page I saw in passing while
On 27/03/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/22/08, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2
Hi Simon...
Thanks very much for your clarification and help :D .
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mohammed,
>
> To clarify, the process Niall recommended is as follows:
>
> (1)
> You send an email in a separate thread, requesting sandbox co
13 matches
Mail list logo
