Here's a peek at some of the interesting issues in the 3.3 TODO list
that need discussion:
* COLLECTIONS-238 - Allowing ExtendedProperties to have empty values.
ie) "foo=" would result in a key of foo existing.
Is anyone concerned about backwards compatibility with that? I'm happy
with it - it s
With 6 +1s on the Commons Lang 2.4 release from:
Paul Benedict (non-binding)
Oliver Heger
Phil Steitz
Sebastian Bazeley
Rahul Akolkar
Gary Gregory
2.4 is ready to go :)
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
On 3/18/08, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/18/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 3/16/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > Someone ha
On 3/18/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/16/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > Someone has regenerated Proxy's website and now the version says
> > > "1.1-S
On 3/18/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/18/08, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Which brings me to ... how are the components' m2 sites deployed? :-)
> >
> > Theres no /distributionManagement/site in the effective pom, should there
> be?
> >
>
>
> I manually co
On 3/18/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I liked the m1 dependency page version [1] better than the m2 one [2].
> > The latter seems a bit noisy from the user PoV, and is mildly
> > incorrect in some
On 3/18/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18/03/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I liked the m1 dependency page version [1] better than the m2 one [2].
> > The latter seems a bit noisy from the user PoV, and is mildly
> > incorrect in some places, such as the dependenc
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/16/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Someone has regenerated Proxy's website and now the version says
> > "1.1-SNAPSHOT." There aren't many differences between the latest
> > releas
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I liked the m1 dependency page version [1] better than the m2 one [2].
> The latter seems a bit noisy from the user PoV, and is mildly
> incorrect in some places, such as the dependency tree and transitivity
> of option
On 19/03/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/18/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Not sure I see the point of the group-id on the M2 format, and the
> > classifier should definitely be dropped.
> >
>
>
> The groupId/artifactId/version/classifier are all necessary for
>
On 3/18/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure I see the point of the group-id on the M2 format, and the
> classifier should definitely be dropped.
>
The groupId/artifactId/version/classifier are all necessary for
determining exactly which jar you're talking about. I don't think any
of
On 3/18/08, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which brings me to ... how are the components' m2 sites deployed? :-)
>
> Theres no /distributionManagement/site in the effective pom, should there be?
>
I manually copied the site over to the "live" directory after a successful vote.
-
On 18/03/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I liked the m1 dependency page version [1] better than the m2 one [2].
> The latter seems a bit noisy from the user PoV, and is mildly
> incorrect in some places, such as the dependency tree and transitivity
> of optionality.
>
> I'd lik
On 3/16/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> Someone has regenerated Proxy's website and now the version says
> "1.1-SNAPSHOT." There aren't many differences between the latest
> release and the trunk, but there are some.
>
Which brings me to ... how are the components' m2 s
I liked the m1 dependency page version [1] better than the m2 one [2].
The latter seems a bit noisy from the user PoV, and is mildly
incorrect in some places, such as the dependency tree and transitivity
of optionality.
I'd like to get other opinions.
-Rahul
[1] http://people.apache.org/~rahul/c
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-collections-testframework has an issue affecting its community
integrati
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-collections-testframework has an issue affecting its community
integrati
18 matches
Mail list logo
