On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Gary Gregory
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 11:11 PM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
> >
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 11:11 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
>
> Compiling against 1.2, we have only one inconsistency. The enums
> package uses WeakHashMap's M
Compiling against 1.2, we have only one inconsistency. The enums
package uses WeakHashMap's Map constructor. That wasn't added until
1.3. Not that I could get my JDK 1.2.2 install and the Ant 1.5.4
install to work happily together [or Ant 1.7.0]; however using javac
by hand showed that the above is
On 14/03/2008, Oberhuber, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
>
> > Regex is not available in Java 1.3.
> > Also, how does one know where the year is in the string?
>
>
> Code for this already is in Commons Net, using ORO for the Regex.
> See UnixFTPEntryParser.java line 105
OK, did
On 3/14/08, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The build looks good on all 9 SDKs I tested:
Ok, me browsing through the SVN tag now seems completely inadequate! :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/c
The build looks good on all 9 SDKs I tested:
http://garygregory.com/os/builds/commons-lang-2.4/index.html
In the Jar manifest I see:
X-Compile-Source-JDK: 1.3
X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.1
I know our sources are 1.3 compatible since I just tried it (see report above).
But 1.1 compatible? I doubt th
Niall Pemberton wrote:
IMO breaking compatibility with a *Beta* release is OK, but does
anyone have any objections to doing that?
+1
Breaking a Beta release is OK in my book
Stephen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Sebb,
> Regex is not available in Java 1.3.
> Also, how does one know where the year is in the string?
Code for this already is in Commons Net, using ORO for the Regex.
See UnixFTPEntryParser.java line 105
> 2.2 If previous year also gives a parse error then give up?
Hm... Well, well. The po
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by KenTanaka:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/ExtractAndDecompressGzipFiles
-
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 4:17 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we need in Sling a released jar of commons collections with the meta
> info for OSGi. We currently have two options :)
>
> a) We release a wrapper from the Felix project which just rebundles the
> latest coll
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/
> >
>
> Sigs etc are fine.
>
> Ant 1.6.5 and M
On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/
>
Sigs etc are fine.
Ant 1.6.5 and Maven 1.0.2 test OK using Java 1.3.1
> It's built from an export of
> https://svn.apac
+1 from me. Go ahead and break it. :)
On 3/14/08, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
> > On 3/14/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Niall Pemberton
+1
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 3/14/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Niall Pemberton
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 3/14/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Niall Pemberton
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > How does removing the parameter solve the leaking?
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> >
--- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Niall Pemberton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Paul Benedict
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > How does removing the parameter solve the
> leaking?
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > I don
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How does removing the parameter solve the leaking?
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> I don't want to put you off, but I'm just in the process of writing up
>
Hi!
> Is there a problem with placing the jar in
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/
>
Hmmm shouldn't this be something the nightly build should do already?
Ciao,
Mario
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E
Hi!
>> What's the recommended way of using commons-vfs 1.0 with CIFS support?
>
> You mean where to get the SMB provider from?
>
> Supposed to be in the vfs sandbox ...Mario?
Sorry for being late, wasn't able to connect to our mailserver through
the JSFDays conference network.
Yepp, still in the s
I run JDK 1.6
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 2:07 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Finally gave up and asked on #maven. Turns out this is a 2.0.8 bug -
> ${version} + JDK 1.4 leaks the JVM property in and that just happens
> to be 2.4.1.
>
> Changing ${version} to ${project.version} should
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=65286&projectId=156
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 14 Mar 2008 05:08:43 -0700
Finished at: Fri 14 Mar 2008 05:09:07 -0700
Total time: 24s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Num
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=65286&projectId=156
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 14 Mar 2008 05:08:43 -0700
Finished at: Fri 14 Mar 2008 05:09:07 -0700
Total time: 24s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Num
Hi,
we need in Sling a released jar of commons collections with the meta
info for OSGi. We currently have two options :)
a) We release a wrapper from the Felix project which just rebundles the
latest collections release and adds the meta info.
b) A new version of collections with the info is
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=65156&projectId=191
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Error
Started at: Fri 14 Mar 2008 00:32:05 -0700
Finished at: Fri 14 Mar 2008 00:32:37 -0700
Total time: 32s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Number:
Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/
It's built from an export of
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC2
and the Ant build built fine for me under JDK 1.3.
Note: The findbugs and cobertura re
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=65155&projectId=116
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Error
Started at: Fri 14 Mar 2008 00:29:58 -0700
Finished at: Fri 14 Mar 2008 00:31:42 -0700
Total time: 1m 44s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numb
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=65154&projectId=21
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Error
Started at: Fri 14 Mar 2008 00:27:20 -0700
Finished at: Fri 14 Mar 2008 00:28:38 -0700
Total time: 1m 18s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numbe
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=65149&projectId=362
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 14 Mar 2008 00:21:48 -0700
Finished at: Fri 14 Mar 2008 00:22:10 -0700
Total time: 21s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Nu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=65149&projectId=362
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 14 Mar 2008 00:21:48 -0700
Finished at: Fri 14 Mar 2008 00:22:10 -0700
Total time: 21s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Nu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=65143&projectId=159
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 14 Mar 2008 00:15:28 -0700
Finished at: Fri 14 Mar 2008 00:15:53 -0700
Total time: 24s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Nu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=65143&projectId=159
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 14 Mar 2008 00:15:28 -0700
Finished at: Fri 14 Mar 2008 00:15:53 -0700
Total time: 24s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Nu
Finally gave up and asked on #maven. Turns out this is a 2.0.8 bug -
${version} + JDK 1.4 leaks the JVM property in and that just happens
to be 2.4.1.
Changing ${version} to ${project.version} should have fixed it, but didn't.
Other options are:
* Pass in -Dversion=2.4 [this breaks Jetty, which
34 matches
Mail list logo