Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 9

2008-03-05 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
+1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 9

2008-03-05 Thread Ben Speakmon
+1, looks good. On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry correct URL for the diffs since the last release is here: > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/pom.xml?r1=631209&r2=634135&diff_format=h > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 9

2008-03-05 Thread Niall Pemberton
Sorry correct URL for the diffs since the last release is here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/pom.xml?r1=631209&r2=634135&diff_format=h On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Apologies, I'd like to do another (versi

[VOTE] Release commons-parent 9

2008-03-05 Thread Niall Pemberton
Hi, Apologies, I'd like to do another (version 9) commons-parent release (hopefully the last for a while) - the changes since the last release are: - Use the maven-bundle-plugin to generate an OSGi manifest file (rather than the whole jar and manifest) and configure the jar plugin to use the gen

Re: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites

2008-03-05 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Feel free to use this compatibility information: > http://garygregory.com/os/builds/index.html > I run it from time to time or on demand. Could you run it for the current trunk of lang as I think Henri's gearing up for a r

Re: [sandbox] Component ideas

2008-03-05 Thread Matt Benson
My component ideas: * I am still interested in incubating Morph as another shot at Commons-convert, though I'm not sure how it will be received given its overlap with BeanUtils, to which Niall has been giving quite some attention lately. * I am for all intents and purposes clear to release a flat

Re: [sandbox] Component ideas

2008-03-05 Thread Matt Benson
--- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Jörg Schaible > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Henri Yandell wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > Via the incubator, yes? > > > > > > I'm the only committer on all three, so as I > understand it I could > > > jus

Re: [sandbox] Component ideas

2008-03-05 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Hen, > > > > I'm the only committer on all three, so as I understand it I could > > just commit straight into the Sandbox, > > I don't think so, see the highlighted box here: > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/

Re: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites

2008-03-05 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Gary Gregory a écrit : Feel free to use this compatibility information: http://garygregory.com/os/builds/index.html I run it from time to time or on demand. Gary Really nice ! If you have some time to add Commons Configuration that would be great. I'd love to have this kind of report for t

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

2008-03-05 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jaxme development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites

2008-03-05 Thread sebb
On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:25 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:58 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberto

Re: [sandbox] Component ideas

2008-03-05 Thread Roland Weber
Hi Hen, I'm the only committer on all three, so as I understand it I could just commit straight into the Sandbox, I don't think so, see the highlighted box here: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html "even if the external developer is already an ASF committer." cheers, Roland

Re: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites

2008-03-05 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:25 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:58 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I just re-published all the c

Re: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites

2008-03-05 Thread sebb
On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:58 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by > > > mistake) it had used a patched

Re: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites

2008-03-05 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:58 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by > > mistake) it had used a patched copy of the > > maven-project-info-reports-plugin that I have in my

Re: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites

2008-03-05 Thread sebb
On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by > mistake) it had used a patched copy of the > maven-project-info-reports-plugin that I have in my local repo > (sorry!). Anyway I submitted a patch to maven to include the

RE: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites

2008-03-05 Thread Gary Gregory
Feel free to use this compatibility information: http://garygregory.com/os/builds/index.html I run it from time to time or on demand. Gary > -Original Message- > From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 7:38 AM > To: Commons Developers List > Subje

Re: [all] Showing the Java Version on component sites

2008-03-05 Thread James Carman
On 3/5/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by > mistake) it had used a patched copy of the > maven-project-info-reports-plugin that I have in my local repo > (sorry!). Anyway I submitted a patch to maven to include the Jav

[all] Showing the Java Version on component sites

2008-03-05 Thread Niall Pemberton
I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by mistake) it had used a patched copy of the maven-project-info-reports-plugin that I have in my local repo (sorry!). Anyway I submitted a patch to maven to include the Java version on the dependencies page. The feedback I got was they p

[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons FileUpload

2008-03-05 Thread Continuum VMBuild Server
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=60325&projectId=166 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Error Started at: Wed 5 Mar 2008 07:31:33 -0800 Finished at: Wed 5 Mar 2008 07:32:15 -0800 Total time: 42s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Number: 7

[all] Component sites - Issue Tracking and Download pages

2008-03-05 Thread Niall Pemberton
I have re-generated all the *proper" component sites with m2 builds (i.e. all except jelly and attributes) with the Issue Tracking and Download pages generated by the commons-build-plugin. I have also re-generated all the sandbox component sites with the Issue Tracking page generated by commons-bui

Re: svn commit: r633821 - /commons/proper/net/trunk/xdocs/changes.xml

2008-03-05 Thread sebb
On 05/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: niallp > Date: Wed Mar 5 03:29:54 2008 > New Revision: 633821 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=633821&view=rev > Log: > Fix badly formed XML causing changes report to fail > One of the perils of patches provided a

Re: svn commit: r633798 - /commons/proper/net/branches/NET_2_0/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/net/telnet/TelnetInputStream.java

2008-03-05 Thread sebb
On 05/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: rwinston > Date: Wed Mar 5 01:25:48 2008 > New Revision: 633798 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=633798&view=rev > Log: > Add missing patch (NET-73) > > Modified: > > commons/proper/net/branches/NET_2_0/src/m

Re: [NET] Subversion Properties [was Re: svn commit: r633759 -...]

2008-03-05 Thread sebb
On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rory, > > This is getting boring - PLEASE update your subversion client to > automatically add the svn:eol-style and svn:keywords properties when > you add new files - especially seeting the eol-style one to "native". > The Struts wiki

[NET] Subversion Properties [was Re: svn commit: r633759 -...]

2008-03-05 Thread Niall Pemberton
Rory, This is getting boring - PLEASE update your subversion client to automatically add the svn:eol-style and svn:keywords properties when you add new files - especially seeting the eol-style one to "native". The Struts wiki has some details on this here, which may help: http://wiki.apache.org/s

Re: [pool] New DBCP deadlock reported (DBCP-44)

2008-03-05 Thread Christoph Kutzinski
> > Not having thought this through all the way, I was thinking about an > > integer property that could take one of four values > > "BORROWED" - a ghost in the pool snapshot > > "IDLE" - in the pool, OK to borrow > > "DEAD" - in the pool, marked for eviction > > "VALIDATING" - in the pool, being