Mario Ivankovits wrote:
> Hi!
>> I've been using the project for the last 6 months or so and haven't
>> seen very many commits or activity on JIRA. Is there intention for
>> on going support?
>>
> As long as no code work needs to be done I think support is
> still there.
>
> Unhappily VFS lacks
Hi!
> I've been using the project for the last 6 months or so and haven't seen
> very many commits or activity on JIRA. Is there intention for on going
> support?
>
As long as no code work needs to be done I think support is still there.
Unhappily VFS lacks of developers and my time is limited
NodeHandler serves as an additional layer of abstraction between a
hierarchical configuration and its node structure.
So far hierarchical configurations directly operate on ConfigurationNode
objects, which means that the whole structure has to be present in
memory as node objects. This is less
Just a quick question as to the current state of commons-vfs.
I've been using the project for the last 6 months or so and haven't seen
very many commits or activity on JIRA. Is there intention for on going
support?
Andrew
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-net has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Hello Jeffrey,
many thanks for offering help!
Are you a Commons Net committer?
For me it looks like there is two tasks for releasing
commons net 1.4.2:
(a) Look through JIRA to see if there are any more
fixes outstanding or worth backporting. I'm not
100% sure but it could be that there
Hi,
I've been working on the type conversion lately, it's almost complete, I
still have to refactor the unit tests and write the docs. Here is what I
plan to commit:
- A new Converter interface is introduced in the o.a.c.c.converter
package. This interface has a single method designed to con
On 2/28/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Author: niallp
> > > Date: Mon Feb 4 00:55:29 2008
> > > New Revision: 618207
> > >
> >
On 2/28/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:36 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How do we configure Continuum? Proxy is still set up against the
> > version in the sandbox.
>
>
> Register then ping the infra@ list to ask for admin kama fo
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:36 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do we configure Continuum? Proxy is still set up against the
> version in the sandbox.
Register then ping the infra@ list to ask for admin kama for commons -
I have it and can try and sort it out if you want.
Niall
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by JamesCarman:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/FrontPage
The comment on the change is:
Moving proxy out of the "Sandbox"
--
How do we configure Continuum? Proxy is still set up against the
version in the sandbox.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to release version 8 of the commons-parent pom - the changes
> since the last release are:
> - re-order mailing archives
> - configure the maven-bundle-plugin (for OSGi)
> - configure the commons-build-plugin (for OSGi)
> - maven-install-plugin 2.
On 2/28/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK seems like theres a bit of an impasse on this since we disagree.
> Currently there are two +1 votes - if you feel strongly I suggest you
> vote -1 on this release, otherwise if it gets three +1 votes and
> reaches +72hrs I'll release it
OK seems like theres a bit of an impasse on this since we disagree.
Currently there are two +1 votes - if you feel strongly I suggest you
vote -1 on this release, otherwise if it gets three +1 votes and
reaches +72hrs I'll release it.
Niall
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:15 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Author: niallp
> > Date: Mon Feb 4 00:55:29 2008
> > New Revision: 618207
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=618207&view=rev
> > Log:
> > F
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-net has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
All,
In Proxy, I currently have my SLF4J dependency version declared like this:
org.slf4j
slf4j-api
[1.4.0,)
true
With this, maven will download the latest version of SLF4J (1.5.0 I
believe) and use that during the build. Do we have an official policy
regarding our dependency versions
On 2/28/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 28/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The only problem is that the KEYS file isn't group writable currently.
> > So, I couldn't upload my changes to it.
> >
>
>
> OK, updated.
And, I've copied the new version with my key in it
On 28/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only problem is that the KEYS file isn't group writable currently.
> So, I couldn't upload my changes to it.
>
OK, updated.
> On 2/23/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Author: dennisl
> > Date: Sat Feb 23 07:55:
The only problem is that the KEYS file isn't group writable currently.
So, I couldn't upload my changes to it.
On 2/23/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: dennisl
> Date: Sat Feb 23 07:55:47 2008
> New Revision: 630459
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=630459&vie
Oliver, I'm not sure to follow you on the NodeHandler, could you explain
the "big picture" behind it ? Does it mean the removal of
ConfigurationNode ?
Emmanuel Bourg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Author: oheger
Date: Wed Feb 27 23:03:05 2008
New Revision: 631875
URL: http://svn.apache.org/vi
23 matches
Mail list logo
