Re: [RESULT] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-27 Thread James Carman
Where are those utilities mentioned on the "Cutting the Release" page? The verify_sigs.sh, sign_and_hash.sh, etc.? It says they're in SVN, but I couldn't find them. What's the full URL? On 2/27/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, they will disappear, but may take a day or so to be picked

Re: [RESULT] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-27 Thread sebb
Yes, they will disappear, but may take a day or so to be picked up (longer than the new files). File deletions are only synched once a day between people.a.o and www.a.o, whereas new files are done more frequently (2 hours?). S/// On 28/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think I

Re: [RESULT] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-27 Thread James Carman
I think I messed up my symbolic links. I named them commons-proxy-bin* rather than commons-proxy* for the binary distribution files. I have renamed them. Some of the mirrors are showing the *-bin files already. Will those disappear when they get synchronized and the new ones picked up? This re

Re: [proxy] svn commit: r631654 [1/4]

2008-02-27 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 2/27/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/27/08, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Please fix your SVN client auto-props [1]. > > > > I had that fixed at one time, but I bought a new PC. Sorry. Do I > need to do anything on my end to fix this up (other than c

Re: [RESULT] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-27 Thread James Carman
On 2/27/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The earlier parts of the document assume that the code has been tagged as > > tags/foo-1.2 > > not > > tags/foo-1.2RCn > > The alternative of voting on builds from RCn tags does not seem to be > documented... > > AIUI, the idea is to create th

Re: [RESULT] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-27 Thread sebb
On 26/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:23 PM, James Carman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, are there any directions out there on where I need to copy > > everything to get it "published"? > > > Looks like you have the source and binary distros

Re: [proxy] svn commit: r631654 [1/4]

2008-02-27 Thread James Carman
On 2/27/08, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/27/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Author: jcarman > > Date: Wed Feb 27 09:14:32 2008 > > New Revision: 631654 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=631654&view=rev > > Log: > > PROXY-8: Improve Pro

Re: [proxy] svn commit: r631654 [1/4]

2008-02-27 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 2/27/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: jcarman > Date: Wed Feb 27 09:14:32 2008 > New Revision: 631654 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=631654&view=rev > Log: > PROXY-8: Improve Proxy Serialization > Code Formatting > > Added: > > commons/proper/prox

Re: [beanutils] svn commit: r618207

2008-02-27 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 2/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: niallp > Date: Mon Feb 4 00:55:29 2008 > New Revision: 618207 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=618207&view=rev > Log: > Fix for BEANUTILS-302 - NPE in ArrayConverter when converting a string with > underscores to a st

Re: [RESULT] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-27 Thread sebb
On 27/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:30 PM, James Carman > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/27/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 27/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 2/27/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 8

2008-02-27 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:15 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 27/02/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Niall Pemberton schrieb: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:09 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> On 27/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [RESULT] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-27 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:30 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/27/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 27/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2/27/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Like everything here it needs volunteer

Re: [RESULT] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-27 Thread James Carman
On 2/27/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 27/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/27/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Like everything here it needs volunteers willing to take that role. If > > > I have spare cycles at the time, I would be wi

Re: [RESULT] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-27 Thread sebb
On 27/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/27/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Like everything here it needs volunteers willing to take that role. If > > I have spare cycles at the time, I would be willing to do some > > releases and I don't mind being ask

Re: [RESULT] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-27 Thread James Carman
On 2/27/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Like everything here it needs volunteers willing to take that role. If > I have spare cycles at the time, I would be willing to do some > releases and I don't mind being asked. > Good, cause I may have to do a 1.1 release of proxy soon! :)

Re: [RESULT] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-27 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:48 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/27/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:11 PM, James Carman > > > > I've done this. But, when you go to the "releases" section of the > > > commons site, it says that pro

Re: [RESULT] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-27 Thread James Carman
On 2/27/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:11 PM, James Carman > > I've done this. But, when you go to the "releases" section of the > > commons site, it says that proxy has not had a release yet. What > > sets all of that up? > > > The site is in co

Re: [RESULT] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-27 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:11 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/27/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:55 AM, James Carman > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2/26/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

2008-02-27 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jaxme development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 8

2008-02-27 Thread sebb
On 27/02/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton schrieb: > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:09 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On 27/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:27 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 8

2008-02-27 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton schrieb: > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:09 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On 27/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:27 PM, sebb <[EMAIL

Re: [RESULT] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-27 Thread James Carman
On 2/27/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:55 AM, James Carman > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/26/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:23 PM, James Carman > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 8

2008-02-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Niall Pemberton schrieb: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:09 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 27/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:27 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > On 27/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 8

2008-02-27 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:09 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 27/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:27 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 27/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 8

2008-02-27 Thread sebb
On 27/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:27 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 27/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:07 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 27/02/2008, Jochen Wiedm

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 8

2008-02-27 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:27 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 27/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:07 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 27/02/2008, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:4

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 8

2008-02-27 Thread sebb
On 27/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:07 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 27/02/2008, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:42 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > 2001 > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 8

2008-02-27 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:07 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 27/02/2008, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:42 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > 2001 > > > 1.3 > > > 1.3 > > > > > > > > Yes. But what's the problem? F

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 8

2008-02-27 Thread sebb
On 27/02/2008, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:42 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2001 > > 1.3 > > 1.3 > > > > Yes. But what's the problem? For the inceptionYear, that has to be > specified whenever you use a parent POM. And for the c

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 8

2008-02-27 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:42 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2001 > 1.3 > 1.3 Yes. But what's the problem? For the inceptionYear, that has to be specified whenever you use a parent POM. And for the compilation source and target properties: That has been in the commons-parent PO

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 8

2008-02-27 Thread sebb
The parent POM defines these items: 2001 1.3 1.3 Surely these should (MUST) be defined by the specific child POMs? On 27/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 from me. > > > Niall > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Niall Pemberton > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 8

2008-02-27 Thread Niall Pemberton
+1 from me. Niall On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to release version 8 of the commons-parent pom - the changes > since the last release are: > - re-order mailing archives > - configure the maven-bundle-plugin (for OSGi) > - co

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 8

2008-02-27 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
+1 -- Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before you break 'em. -- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[VOTE] Release commons-parent 8

2008-02-27 Thread Niall Pemberton
Hi, I'd like to release version 8 of the commons-parent pom - the changes since the last release are: - re-order mailing archives - configure the maven-bundle-plugin (for OSGi) - configure the commons-build-plugin (for OSGi) - maven-install-plugin 2.1 --> 2.2 - maven-surefire-plugin 2.3 --> 2

Re: [RESULT] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-27 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:55 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/26/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:23 PM, James Carman > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So, are there any directions out there on where I need to copy > > > eve

Re: [RESULT] Release Proxy 1.0 (from rc4)

2008-02-27 Thread James Carman
On 2/26/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:23 PM, James Carman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, are there any directions out there on where I need to copy > > everything to get it "published"? > > > Looks like you have the source and binary distros al