[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone know why there's a gap in the navigation menu on the
> proxy website?
>
> http://commons.apache.org/proxy
>
> Did I generate the site wrong?
No. This is normal:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSSITE-14
- Jörg
-
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:50 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems silly to have the ApacheCon logo if it's not clickable.
>
> There is an ApacheCon link on the menu, but that's the other side of the
> page.
>
> Is there any way to fix this?
The background image is put there by the common
Seems silly to have the ApacheCon logo if it's not clickable.
There is an ApacheCon link on the menu, but that's the other side of the page.
Is there any way to fix this?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additiona
Okay, it was Adblock Plus in Firefox. Sorry for the false alarm. I
saw that gap all the way during the release candidate/voting, but I
figured it would fix itself when it was put into the live site or
something.
On 2/26/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Works OK for me in FF.
>
> However th
Works OK for me in FF.
However the logo does not seem to have a link - it's not clickable.
This seems to be because it is a background image.
Which perhaps explains why you are not seeing it - have you disabled
background images?
S///
On 27/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is
What gap?
I don't see one in IE7, FF 2.0.0.12 or Opera 9.26 on WinXP/SP2
On 27/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know why there's a gap in the navigation menu on the proxy
> website?
>
> http://commons.apache.org/proxy
>
> Did I generate the site wrong?
>
>
>
> On
Is anyone seeing the same thing as me? The ApacheCon logo shows up in
IE for both math and proxy, but it doesn't show in Firefox.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oops! well spotted.
I've updated the generic README.html files to use the absolute URL so
that KEYS are always fetched from the Apache site.
This was already done in the specific files.
On 27/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the KEYS file link is bad on proxy's downlo
Does anyone know why there's a gap in the navigation menu on the proxy website?
http://commons.apache.org/proxy
Did I generate the site wrong?
On 2/26/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/26/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Jame
I believe the KEYS file link is bad on proxy's download page.
On 2/26/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've created HEADER.html and README.html files in
>
> commons/xyx
> commons/xyx/binaries
> commons/xyx/source
>
> If there was already an existing html file in commons/xyz, then links
>
added, give it 8 hours
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is there something we can do to have release 1.2 propagated to
> > repo1.maven.org ?
>
> Luc, it looks like you guys
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there something we can do to have release 1.2 propagated to
> repo1.maven.org ?
Luc, it looks like you guys already did your part:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/commons-math/commons-math/1
Hello,
Is there something we can do to have release 1.2 propagated to
repo1.maven.org ?
Luc
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've created HEADER.html and README.html files in
commons/xyx
commons/xyx/binaries
commons/xyx/source
If there was already an existing html file in commons/xyz, then links
to it were created in binaries and source.
Otherwise links were created to the top-level files in commons.
The purpose of t
I am willing to help where I can.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Martin
>
> Sorry for the late reply. It's been a busy year for me, and I am having
> trouble allocating sufficient time to [net] at the moment to close off
> the remaining issues and s
On 2/26/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:23 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, are there any directions out there on where I need to copy
> > everything to get it "published"?
>
>
> Looks like you have the source and binary distros al
On 26/02/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/26/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:23 PM, James Carman
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So, are there any directions out there on where I need to copy
> > > everything to get it "p
On 2/26/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:23 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, are there any directions out there on where I need to copy
> > everything to get it "published"?
>
>
> Looks like you have the source and binary distros al
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:23 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, are there any directions out there on where I need to copy
> everything to get it "published"?
Looks like you have the source and binary distros already done in correct place:
http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/proxy/
So, are there any directions out there on where I need to copy
everything to get it "published"?
On 2/26/08, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Commons Proxy 1.0 release candidate 4 has been approved for release.
> The votes are as follows:
>
> +1 Niall Pemberton (binding)
> +1 Oliver He
Commons Proxy 1.0 release candidate 4 has been approved for release.
The votes are as follows:
+1 Niall Pemberton (binding)
+1 Oliver Heger (binding)
+1 "sebb" (binding)
+1 James Carman (binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:36 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following files in the NET_2_0 branch don't seem to have AL headers:
>
> src/test/java/org/apache/commons/net/ftp/parser/AllTests.java
> src/test/java/org/apache/commons/net/tftp/TFTPTest.java
I've fixed the above - also quit
The following files in the NET_2_0 branch don't seem to have AL headers:
src/test/java/org/apache/commons/net/ftp/parser/AllTests.java
src/test/java/org/apache/commons/net/tftp/TFTPTest.java
The following files in TRUNK don't seem to have AL headers:
src/java/examples/nntp/NNTPUtils.java
src/te
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 4:12 AM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Two issues left for the release;
> >
> > 1) Happiness over LANG-362. Niall, you were the -1 here, are you happy
> > with the solution?
>
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
On 2/26/08, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It has been used internally by the Maven developers for quite some time
> now. The main purpose is to move artifacts from a staging repository to
> the real repository.
>
> A staging repo, usually put in a user's home directory on people,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niall Pemberton schrieb:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:55 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/25/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:36 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/25/08, Niall Pemberton
Daniel,
I finallay found the solution. I just removed the enterLocalPassiveMode(),
then it works. I think the FTP Server supports the passive mode because I
manaully FTP by using passive mode without any problem. Not sure why it does
not like the local passive mode in the code.
Tha
--- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Henri Yandell
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Two issues left for the release;
> >
> > 1) Happiness over LANG-362. Niall, you were the
> -1 here, are you happy
> > with the solution?
>
> OK I'll take a look.
Oh
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:35 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/26/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK but I still don't see much benefit - if I'm creating a release
> > candidate I have to zip up the artifacts and upload them to
> > p.a.o/~niallp so no big d
On 2/26/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK but I still don't see much benefit - if I'm creating a release
> candidate I have to zip up the artifacts and upload them to
> p.a.o/~niallp so no big deal to include the site as well. My
> preference is to keep it simple and I can't se
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton schrieb:
>
>
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:55 PM, James Carman
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/25/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:36 PM,
Niall Pemberton schrieb:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:55 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 2/25/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:36 PM, James Carman
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > On 2/25/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PRO
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two issues left for the release;
>
> 1) Happiness over LANG-362. Niall, you were the -1 here, are you happy
> with the solution?
OK I'll take a look.
> 2) OSGi; Niall (again, sorry :) ); you'd volunteered to do this?
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:55 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/25/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:36 PM, James Carman
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 2/25/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I would lik
Sounds like a good idea
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the 2nd email. Any thoughts on removing the AllTests files?
> With pom.xml as the only build, I don't see any need for them.
>
> Hen
>
> --
Sorry for the 2nd email. Any thoughts on removing the AllTests files?
With pom.xml as the only build, I don't see any need for them.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=55958&projectId=177
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Error
Started at: Tue 26 Feb 2008 00:41:40 -0800
Finished at: Tue 26 Feb 2008 00:42:23 -0800
Total time: 42s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Number:
I get somewhat confused by the existence of the writer subpackage.
We've a bug reported against it [it's not nullsafe - SANDBOX-209 ];
and I'm wondering if it's worth keeping?
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Two issues left for the release;
1) Happiness over LANG-362. Niall, you were the -1 here, are you happy
with the solution?
2) OSGi; Niall (again, sorry :) ); you'd volunteered to do this?
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
40 matches
Mail list logo
