Nope - sadly I won't be there. Too close to the hatching of the secondborn.
Hen
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yepp! I'll be around!
>
>
>
> On 20.02.2008, at 20:56, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
> > Niall Pemberton a écrit :
> >> Anyone planning to be at
On 21/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to release commons-build-plugin 1.0 based on rc2.
>
> The main differences from rc1 are improvements/corrections to the
> templates suggested by Dennis - the following links provide examples
> of the files generated by the temp
I'd like to release commons-build-plugin 1.0 based on rc2.
The main differences from rc1 are improvements/corrections to the
templates suggested by Dennis - the following links provide examples
of the files generated by the templates:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/chain/download_chain.html
http
ok. I will learn the process, because i am new to open source process. thank
you.
Hao Zheng
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:19 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Maybe you should file a JIRA asking for an enhancement. This sounds
> like it could be useful and not very difficult.
>
> On 2/
This vote is cancelled since Dennis pointed out some good
improvements/fixes to the plugin and I'm going to roll another RC.
Thanks for everyones comments and votes .
Niall
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to release commons-build-plugin.
>
>
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > I'd like to release commons-build-plugin.
> >
> > Artifacts available for review are here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/cbp-1.0-rc1/
> >
> > SVN Tag:
> >
> http://svn.apache.o
No major problems, however there are some items that can be improved:
Dependency Listings entry:
>>>
Commons Proxy
Java library for dynamic proxying
../../../../../people.apache.org/www/commons.apache.org/proper/proxy/
<<<
Not sure where that originates, but it does not look right.
Ideally th
A few suggestions for the next release (don't hold 1.0 just for this if
you don't have the time) :
- A tutorial with short code examples would be nice to get a quick taste
of the API. The overview page is not very sexy, I'm not a proxy guru and
I'm not sure to understand what I can achieve wit
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I'd like to release commons-build-plugin.
Artifacts available for review are here:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/cbp-1.0-rc1/
SVN Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-build-plugin/tags/commons-build-plugin-1.0-RC1/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~n
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:03 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/20/08, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
>
> > You are right, the release instructions seem to be outdated in this area.
> >
> > It has become common practice to cut release candidates, tag them as
>
On 2/20/08, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> You are right, the release instructions seem to be outdated in this area.
>
> It has become common practice to cut release candidates, tag them as
> such in subversion, but set the version numbers to the actual release
> version. (Typical
James Carman schrieb:
On 2/20/08, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton schrieb:
I'm +0 on this release because I like to review the actual artifacts
> that are going to be distributed. The distros IMO meet ASF release
> requirements but if I run command "mvn -Prc site ass
On 2/20/08, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton schrieb:
>
> > I'm +0 on this release because I like to review the actual artifacts
> > that are going to be distributed. The distros IMO meet ASF release
> > requirements but if I run command "mvn -Prc site assembly:assembly"
Emmanuel Bourg schrieb:
Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
I haven't seen this error, could this be a conflict with your JDK and
a Xerces lib somewhere in your classpath ?
Actually I reproduced the same error by switching to JDK 1.6, it works
fine with JDK 1.5.
Emmanuel Bourg
Yes, I can confirm thi
Niall Pemberton schrieb:
I'm +0 on this release because I like to review the actual artifacts
that are going to be distributed. The distros IMO meet ASF release
requirements but if I run command "mvn -Prc site assembly:assembly"
then the binary distro created also includes the javadocs and also
-
On 20.02.2008, at 20:17, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 12:39 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
What should we do with old sandbox sites after the project has been
promoted to the "proper"? Commons Proxy and Commons VFS still have
their old sites out there. Should we remov
Yepp! I'll be around!
On 20.02.2008, at 20:56, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Niall Pemberton a écrit :
Anyone planning to be at ApacheCon EU 2008?
I'm going to be there - perhaps we could have an informal get
together
if there are a few of us?
Sure! I'll be there from sunday evening to friday noon
Niall Pemberton a écrit :
Anyone planning to be at ApacheCon EU 2008?
I'm going to be there - perhaps we could have an informal get together
if there are a few of us?
Sure! I'll be there from sunday evening to friday noon.
Luc
Niall
On Feb 19, 2008 12:39 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What should we do with old sandbox sites after the project has been
> promoted to the "proper"? Commons Proxy and Commons VFS still have
> their old sites out there. Should we remove them? Should we put a
> redirect page in ther
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone planning to be at ApacheCon EU 2008?
I'll be there.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
Anyone planning to be at ApacheCon EU 2008?
I'm going to be there - perhaps we could have an informal get together
if there are a few of us?
Niall
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMA
On 20/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2008 6:16 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 20/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Feb 20, 2008 5:35 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 20/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL P
On Feb 20, 2008 6:16 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 20/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Feb 20, 2008 5:35 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 20/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Feb 20, 2008 3:56 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECT
New site uploaded with corrected dependencies page and "goals" link fixed:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/cbp-1.0-rc1/site/
Niall
On Feb 20, 2008 5:50 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2008 5:35 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 20/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <
On 20/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2008 5:35 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 20/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Feb 20, 2008 3:56 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 19/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Feb 20, 2008 5:35 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Feb 20, 2008 3:56 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 19/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I'd like to release commons-build-plugin.
> >
On 20/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2008 3:56 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 19/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'd like to release commons-build-plugin.
> > >
> > > Artifacts available for review are here:
> > > http:/
On Feb 20, 2008 3:56 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to release commons-build-plugin.
> >
> > Artifacts available for review are here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/cbp-1.0-rc1/
> >
> > SVN Tag:
> >
> > http://
Maybe you should file a JIRA asking for an enhancement. This sounds
like it could be useful and not very difficult.
On 2/20/08, zheng hao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah, I just mean that.
>
> it's much like the api of javamail itself, but we can provide more
> conventient usage than it. most i
On 19/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to release commons-build-plugin.
>
> Artifacts available for review are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/cbp-1.0-rc1/
>
> SVN Tag:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-build-plugin/tags/commons-buil
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
+1
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Brent Worden
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 8:57 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release math 1.2 (second attempt)
This is a vote to release Commons Math 1.2.
The zips / tars are here:
http://people.apac
yeah, I just mean that.
it's much like the api of javamail itself, but we can provide more
conventient usage than it. most important is the efficiency of sending mails
in a batch.
On Feb 20, 2008 7:17 PM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mean something like this?
>
> EmailTransmis
sebb a écrit :
The method signature was also changed to public - was this intended?
Yes this was necessary to access the method from the beanutils package.
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addit
On 20/02/2008, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb a écrit :
>
> > The removal of BeanUtils was not the only change.
> >
> > Best to use separate commits for independent changes; if not, please
> > use a log message that reflects all the actual updates.
>
> Actually the change to Prope
On 20.02.2008, at 12:50, James Carman wrote:
Is anyone else having trouble with the GPG Plugin in Commons Parent?
I even tried overriding the version in Proxy's pom (to 1.0-alpha-4),
but I still get an error. I get a NullPointerException. Anyone else?
I can sign the artifacts by hand using g
On 20/02/2008, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...so your suggestion is to remove those link?
Yes.
> How do you distinguish
> between pages for "developers" and "general users"?
One way is to have a "developers" page. This is done by some projects, e.g. Math
http://commons.apache.org
sebb a écrit :
The removal of BeanUtils was not the only change.
Best to use separate commits for independent changes; if not, please
use a log message that reflects all the actual updates.
Actually the change to PropertyConverter was related to this removal to
avoid a ClassCastException, th
...so your suggestion is to remove those link? How do you distinguish
between pages for "developers" and "general users"?
cheers
--
Torsten
On 19.02.2008, at 17:05, sebb wrote:
http://www.apache.org/dev/nightly-builds.html says that nightly builds
are allowed, but that the general public sho
+1
On 19.02.2008, at 18:07, Niall Pemberton wrote:
I'd like to release commons-build-plugin.
Artifacts available for review are here:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/cbp-1.0-rc1/
SVN Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-build-plugin/
tags/commons-build-plugin-1.0-RC1/
Is anyone else having trouble with the GPG Plugin in Commons Parent?
I even tried overriding the version in Proxy's pom (to 1.0-alpha-4),
but I still get an error. I get a NullPointerException. Anyone else?
I can sign the artifacts by hand using gpg, so I know the default key
is set up properly.
You mean something like this?
EmailTransmission trans = new EmailTransmission();
trans.setHostName("smtp.myserver.org");
HtmlEmail email1 = new HtmlEmail();
...
HtmlEmail email2 = new HtmlEmail();
...
trans.addEmail(email1);
trans.addEmail(email2);
..
trans.send();
Sounds useful to m
On 20/02/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: ebourg
> Date: Wed Feb 20 01:16:32 2008
> New Revision: 629391
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=629391&view=rev
> Log:
> BeanUtils is no longer required to use DefaultConfigurationBuilder
The removal of BeanUtils was no
Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
I haven't seen this error, could this be a conflict with your JDK and a
Xerces lib somewhere in your classpath ?
Actually I reproduced the same error by switching to JDK 1.6, it works
fine with JDK 1.5.
Emmanuel Bourg
---
45 matches
Mail list logo
