FYI, this RC builds and tests OK on the 9 SDKs I tested [1]
Gary
[1] http://garygregory.com/os/builds/index.html#commons-fileupload-1.2.1
Thank you,
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Jochen Wiedmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 1:46 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=39103&projectId=170
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Error
Started at: Sat 19 Jan 2008 19:57:30 -0800
Finished at: Sat 19 Jan 2008 19:58:21 -0800
Total time: 50s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Number:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=39077&projectId=176
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 19 Jan 2008 19:36:02 -0800
Finished at: Sat 19 Jan 2008 19:36:25 -0800
Total time: 23s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Nu
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=39075&projectId=159
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Error
Started at: Sat 19 Jan 2008 19:34:13 -0800
Finished at: Sat 19 Jan 2008 19:34:30 -0800
Total time: 16s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Num
On 20/01/2008, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri,
>
> How do you know that the reports are GPL? I knew Cobertura is written under
> GPL, but how does that extend to the report generation?
>
The problem is with the Javascript files that are used to display the results.
> Paul
>
> On
On 1/19/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wanting to share concern about a couple of things:
>
> 1) Using Cobertura. It's reports are GPL.
> 2) Including sites in downloads.
>
> If we have a component with Cobertura turned on, and with the site
> included in the distribution, then
Henri Yandell a écrit :
Just wanting to share concern about a couple of things:
1) Using Cobertura. It's reports are GPL.
2) Including sites in downloads.
If we have a component with Cobertura turned on, and with the site
included in the distribution, then things are very unhappy.
Findbugs doe
Henri,
How do you know that the reports are GPL? I knew Cobertura is written under
GPL, but how does that extend to the report generation?
Paul
On Jan 19, 2008 1:51 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wanting to share concern about a couple of things:
>
> 1) Using Cobertura. It'
On 19/01/2008, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I created a ticket for this issue [1], so that it won't get lost.
I've actually submitted a patch to fix the "problem".
--
Cheers,
Hasan Diwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To un
On 19/01/2008, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just submitted a patch to commons-parent, which introduces two
> new properties: commons.encoding and commons.docEncoding. The former
> is the encoding of Java source files, the second is the encoding of
> generated Javadoc
Hi,
I have just submitted a patch to commons-parent, which introduces two
new properties: commons.encoding and commons.docEncoding. The former
is the encoding of Java source files, the second is the encoding of
generated Javadoc files.
This change was caused by the problems with the copyright sym
Henri Yandell schrieb:
On Jan 17, 2008 1:17 PM, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henri Yandell schrieb:
Should the DatabaseConfiguration class be responsible for protecting
against SQL Injection, or should we make sure the javadoc states that
it offers no protection and leave that up to
Paul Cowan a écrit :
Hi all,
I'd like to propose adding a Zipf (or Zipfian) integer distribution to
commons-math.
The Zipf distribution is a distribution which (approximately) reflects
many 'real-world' phenomena, e.g. the frequency of use of words in a
language.
This is a good idea.
I
Just wanting to share concern about a couple of things:
1) Using Cobertura. It's reports are GPL.
2) Including sites in downloads.
If we have a component with Cobertura turned on, and with the site
included in the distribution, then things are very unhappy.
Findbugs doesn't seem to be the same i
On Jan 17, 2008 1:17 PM, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri Yandell schrieb:
>
> > Should the DatabaseConfiguration class be responsible for protecting
> > against SQL Injection, or should we make sure the javadoc states that
> > it offers no protection and leave that up to the user?
>
On 19/01/2008, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> The build works for me in all variants as expected (on JDK 1.6). The
> only minor nit I have is that the Copyright in the Javadocs still looks
> a bit wired (at least on my browser): Instead of the Copyright character
> I only get a "?
+1
The build works for me in all variants as expected (on JDK 1.6). The
only minor nit I have is that the Copyright in the Javadocs still looks
a bit wired (at least on my browser): Instead of the Copyright character
I only get a "?".
Oliver
Jochen Wiedmann schrieb:
Hi,
I have prepared a
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
18 matches
Mail list logo
