Hi, I made a patch for fairness feature on GenericObjectPool.
Please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-75 .
This patch provides the lightweight semaphore based on maxActive
number and wraps GenericObjectPool#borrowObject().
As a result, the performance of pool is improved because the
On Jan 7, 2008 8:02 PM, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> I've tested building and unit testing on a bunch of Java platforms [1] and
> all looks well. If there is a specific Java version that you would like to
> test, let me know and I'll put it on my to-do list.
>
Thanks,
Hi,
I understand that there are branches for introducing Generics
and other Java5 and Java6 features into both Commons Lang and
Commons Collections (collections_jdk5_branch and LangTwo-1.x
respectively). I'd like to see these released and available to
use and am willing to donate time to see this
I have posted patches for COLLECTIONS-227 and COLLECTIONS-265. it may
be doing unnecessary work, I was just looking for the most
straightforward approach to solve both. Any comments are appreciated!
--
Cheers,
Hasan Diwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
On Jan 8, 2008 10:53 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wrong list, I presume.
Rats, thank you!
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
Wrong list, I presume.
-Rahul
On 1/8/08, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have evaluated the bug report MCLIRR-7 and must admit that I am
> stuck. Here's what I have found:
>
> Clirr requires two classloaders, one with the previous version and one
> with the current version.
Hi,
I have evaluated the bug report MCLIRR-7 and must admit that I am
stuck. Here's what I have found:
Clirr requires two classloaders, one with the previous version and one
with the current version. In order to create the first classloader,
the clirr-maven-plugin does the following:
- Resolves
On 1/7/08, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [1] http://garygregory.com/os/builds/index.html#commons-pool-1.4-RC2
>
Neat :-)
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL P
Forwarding to the Felix list.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Begin Message ---
On Dec 28, 2007 12:35 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in the meantime Stuart fixed the problem with the maven bundleplugin, so
> I think we can give it a test drive :)
>
> A
On Dec 28, 2007 12:35 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in the meantime Stuart fixed the problem with the maven bundleplugin, so
> I think we can give it a test drive :)
>
> Attached is a patch for the parent pom of commons and one to demonstrate
> how to add support for OSG
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 7:12 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 6:49 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 4:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 12:11 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMA
On Jan 8, 2008 7:12 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2008 6:49 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > > On Jan 8, 2008 4:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> On Jan 8, 2008 12:11 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Jan 8, 2008 6:49 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Jan 8, 2008 4:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Jan 8, 2008 12:11 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> Sorry, if I am coming up with this question so late
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 4:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 12:11 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, if I am coming up with this question so late. Nevertheless:
Does the current parent pom deal with adding NOTICE.txt and
LICENSE.t
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 11:52 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to update the version for the cobertura-maven-plugin before we
release this. The version currently being used is broken. Is that OK?
Is this something that should go in commons-parent?
Yes it
Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Jan 8, 2008 4:11 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Does the current parent pom deal with adding NOTICE.txt and
> > > > LICENSE.txt to the javadoc jar files?
> > >
> > > No - but AIUI it doesn't need to since it only contains
On Jan 8, 2008 4:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2008 12:11 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Sorry, if I am coming up with this question so late. Nevertheless:
> > > Does the current parent pom deal with adding NOTICE.txt and
> > > LICENSE.txt to
On Jan 8, 2008 4:11 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2008 3:11 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 8, 2008 10:50 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Jan 8, 2008 3:44 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In rem
> > > > On Jan 8, 2008 12:17 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I thought there were some licensing issues related to using Cobertura?
Is there a bug report for the maven-cobertura-plugin? I'll possibly be
able to fix that.
Jochen
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So th
On Jan 8, 2008 12:11 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry, if I am coming up with this question so late. Nevertheless:
> > Does the current parent pom deal with adding NOTICE.txt and
> > LICENSE.txt to the javadoc jar files?
>
> No - but AIUI it doesn't need to since it only co
On Jan 8, 2008 3:11 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2008 10:50 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 8, 2008 3:44 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > In removing the remote-resources-plugin I ommitted to add back local
> > > resour
On 1/8/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-164 issue presents a
> multiplication case which is neither consistent with double multiplication nor
> compliant to C99. Considering the division case which already handles lots of
> special ca
The https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-164 issue presents a
multiplication case which is neither consistent with double multiplication nor
compliant to C99. Considering the division case which already handles lots of
special cases, I think we should really be C99-compliant for this method.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
On Jan 8, 2008 10:24 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 08/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 8, 2008 12:24 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Jan 8, 2008 12:17 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I thought there were some licensing iss
On Jan 8, 2008 10:50 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2008 3:44 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In removing the remote-resources-plugin I ommitted to add back local
> > resource configuration for the NOTICE.tx and LICENSE.txt files.
> > Because of this
On Jan 8, 2008 3:44 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In removing the remote-resources-plugin I ommitted to add back local
> resource configuration for the NOTICE.tx and LICENSE.txt files.
> Because of this I would like to do another release of commons-parent.
> Apologies for this.
On 08/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2008 12:24 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 8, 2008 12:17 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I thought there were some licensing issues related to using Cobertura?
> > >
> > > e.g.
> > >
> > > http
28 matches
Mail list logo
