Hello All:
I've tested building and unit testing on a bunch of Java platforms [1] and all
looks well. If there is a specific Java version that you would like to test,
let me know and I'll put it on my to-do list.
Gary
[1] http://garygregory.com/os/builds/index.html#commons-pool-1.4-RC2
>
Hi,
In removing the remote-resources-plugin I ommitted to add back local
resource configuration for the NOTICE.tx and LICENSE.txt files.
Because of this I would like to do another release of commons-parent.
Apologies for this.
The changes since the the last release of version 6 in summary:
Chang
On Jan 8, 2008 12:24 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2008 12:17 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I thought there were some licensing issues related to using Cobertura?
> >
> > e.g.
> >
> > http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--all--Commons-SCXML-0.7-RC1-available-p14278429.
Apologies - this vote is cancelled due to my screw up with
commons-parent-6. I think we need a commons-parent-7 released first,
then I'll look at doing this after.
Niall
On Jan 7, 2008 4:06 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to release commons-sandbox-parent pom ver
Unfortunately when I removed the remote-resources-plugin[1] from
commons-parent I missed the fact that the "resources" configuration
needed to be added back in (it was removed when the remote resources
plugin was added[2]). So now the NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt files are
not configured to be added
On Jan 7, 2008 6:24 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 08/01/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 7, 2008 4:26 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 07/01/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I have tagged and rolled another (hopefully last) RC for po
On 08/01/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2008 4:26 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 07/01/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have tagged and rolled another (hopefully last) RC for pool-1.4. If
> > > there are no significant problems reported wit
On Jan 7, 2008 4:41 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 07/01/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 07/01/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have tagged and rolled another (hopefully last) RC for pool-1.4. If> >
> > > there are no significant problems reported with th
On Jan 7, 2008 4:26 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 07/01/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have tagged and rolled another (hopefully last) RC for pool-1.4. If
> > there are no significant problems reported with this RC, I will roll a
> > final distribution making only ve
On Jan 8, 2008 1:00 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 08/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 8, 2008 12:40 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 06/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Jan 6, 2008 6:18 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTE
On 08/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2008 12:40 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 06/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Jan 6, 2008 6:18 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 06/01/2008, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL
On Jan 8, 2008 12:40 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 06/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 2008 6:18 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 06/01/2008, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Henri Yandell wrote:
> > > > > On Jan 5, 2
On 06/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008 6:18 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 06/01/2008, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Henri Yandell wrote:
> > > > On Jan 5, 2008 5:51 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> I woul
On Jan 8, 2008 12:17 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought there were some licensing issues related to using Cobertura?
>
> e.g.
>
> http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--all--Commons-SCXML-0.7-RC1-available-p14278429.html
Only on distrubuting in releases - fine to use on the web site.
Niall
>
On Jan 7, 2008 11:52 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to update the version for the cobertura-maven-plugin before we
> release this. The version currently being used is broken. Is that OK?
Is this something that should go in commons-parent?
Niall
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
I thought there were some licensing issues related to using Cobertura?
e.g.
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--all--Commons-SCXML-0.7-RC1-available-p14278429.html
On 07/01/2008, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to update the version for the cobertura-maven-plugin before we
> rele
I'd like to update the version for the cobertura-maven-plugin before we
release this. The version currently being used is broken. Is that OK?
Niall Pemberton wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release commons-sandbox-parent pom version 3 - then last
release used commons-parent version 4 and the only real
On 07/01/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 07/01/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have tagged and rolled another (hopefully last) RC for pool-1.4. If> >
> > there are no significant problems reported with this RC, I will roll a
> > final distribution making only version
On 07/01/2008, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have tagged and rolled another (hopefully last) RC for pool-1.4. If
> there are no significant problems reported with this RC, I will roll a
> final distribution making only version number changes and kick off a
> VOTE based on the release
Phil Steitz wrote:
I have tagged and rolled another (hopefully last) RC for pool-1.4. If
there are no significant problems reported with this RC, I will roll a
final distribution making only version number changes and kick off a
VOTE based on the release bits later this week.
I can confirm tha
+1 with thanks.
On Jan 7, 2008 12:44 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1.
>
> Hen
>
> On Jan 6, 2008 8:06 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to release commons-sandbox-parent pom version 3 - then last
> > release used commons-parent version 4 and
Hi folks,
thanks for your help in promoting commons-exec - I would like to discuss
a few of the points mentioned in the emails
+) "how long is Siegfried sticking around" - well, I can't give you any
binding commitments and you don't expect one. I need a properly working
commons-exec for my c
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I'd prefer to keep it as it is since it could be in for more than one
release and it means not having to remember to update the OSGi info.
Plus anyone wanting to create their own modified custom IO 1.4 version
can simply change the pom version number and the OSGi bundle in
On Jan 7, 2008 3:45 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton schrieb:
> > On Jan 7, 2008 2:56 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2008 9:34 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton schrieb:
On Jan 7, 2008 2:56 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 9:34 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be great if the release contains the OSGi meta information :)
I'll come up w
On Jan 7, 2008 2:56 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >> On Jan 7, 2008 9:34 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> It would be great if the release contains the OSGi meta information :)
> >>> I'll come up with a pa
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 9:34 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be great if the release contains the OSGi meta information :)
I'll come up with a patch just for 1.4 that does not use the snapshot
version of the maven bundle plugin. Int
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Jan 7, 2008 9:34 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be great if the release contains the OSGi meta information :)
I'll come up with a patch just for 1.4 that does not use the snapshot
version of the maven bundle plugin. Interested :) ?
Yes please
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
On Jan 7, 2008 9:34 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be great if the release contains the OSGi meta information :)
> I'll come up with a patch just for 1.4 that does not use the snapshot
> version of the maven bundle plugin. Interested :) ?
Yes please
Niall
> Carsten
>
I've just attached a new patch for IO-77 with a testcase
I'm also added a "moveDirectory" method (with testcase) as suggested in
comments.
Please review .. and include in 1.4 release !
2008/1/7, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> It would be great if the release contains the OSGi meta inf
It would be great if the release contains the OSGi meta information :)
I'll come up with a patch just for 1.4 that does not use the snapshot
version of the maven bundle plugin. Interested :) ?
Carsten
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I would like to get an IO 1.4 release out in the near future. Looking
+1.
Hen
On Jan 6, 2008 8:06 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to release commons-sandbox-parent pom version 3 - then last
> release used commons-parent version 4 and the only real change is to
> upgrade to the latest version 6 of commons-parent.
>
> A full diff of
33 matches
Mail list logo
