On Dec 14, 2007 7:07 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 14/12/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Author: psteitz
> > Date: Thu Dec 13 18:00:35 2007
> > New Revision: 604085
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=604085&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Javadoc fixes.
> >
> >
Noise, forwarding technical portions of an offline
conversation that outgrew itself:
--- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:30:20 -0800 (PST)
> From: Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: jxpath
> To: Michele Vivoda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --- Michele Vivod
Jörg Schaible wrote:
Oliver Heger wrote:
(There was a similar discussion about commons lang recently.)
Configuration used to support JDK 1.3. For the next release (either
1.6 or 2.0) I would like to drop this compatibility. The number
of feature
requests that require a newer JDK version is incr
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
And embarrassingly, I find that revprop--duh--applies
to a complete revision and apparently can't be broken
down by file. >:(
--- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apologies for the overeager commit, all. Modding
> log
> messages to make things look more reasonable. :)
>
> -Matt
>
> -
Apologies for the overeager commit, all. Modding log
messages to make things look more reasonable. :)
-Matt
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: mbenson
> Date: Fri Dec 14 11:08:09 2007
> New Revision: 604261
>
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=604261&view=rev
> Log:
> [JXPATH-108]
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 5:47 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 4:31 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 2:53 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/14/07, Niall Pe
On Dec 14, 2007 5:47 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Dec 14, 2007 4:31 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >>> On Dec 14, 2007 2:53 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/14/07, Niall Pember
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 4:31 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 2:53 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/14/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We definitely do not want to sync the entire m2-snap-rep
On Dec 14, 2007 4:31 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Dec 14, 2007 2:53 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 12/14/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> We definitely do not want to sync the entire m2-snap-repo (i
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 2:53 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/14/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We definitely do not want to sync the entire m2-snap-repo (if thats
possible!). Suggest copying manually (yes, there are downsides etc.,
but its not
Over in Maven land we use the stage plugin. It's not released yet, but
has been working well for me. More info on the process can be found in
step 4 on this page:
http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html
You can contact me if you have further questions.
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On 12/14/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I suggest relegating Snapshots to project info.
>
> There was a discussion about this for JMeter a while back, and the
> consensus was that snapshots were for developers only, and should only
> be published on developer pages (along with warnings ab
On Dec 14, 2007 2:53 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/14/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > We definitely do not want to sync the entire m2-snap-repo (if thats
> > > possible!). Suggest copying manually (yes, there are downsides etc.,
> > > but its not
On 12/14/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > We definitely do not want to sync the entire m2-snap-repo (if thats
> > possible!). Suggest copying manually (yes, there are downsides etc.,
> > but its not like its not been done before and this seems to be special
> > circumstances
On 14/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks again, I've never received much feedback on the site, so thats
> quite useful. Replies below ...
>
> On 12/12/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > A few files still refer to jakarta for stuff that has moved to commons TLP:
> >
On Dec 14, 2007 2:32 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/14/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks, I can move the release over from the SNAPSHOT repo to the
> > official m2 repo with a maven command right? I'll go search the
> > archives for hints how to
On 12/14/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, I can move the release over from the SNAPSHOT repo to the
> official m2 repo with a maven command right? I'll go search the
> archives for hints how to do this - but if anyone has any pointers
> would be much appreciated.
>
Note
On 12/13/07, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The checkstyle reports says the Builtin class is a utility class and
> should not have a public or default constructor. The Javadoc shows the
> default constructor added by the compiler. Could a private constructor
> be added to prevent this ?
Thanks again, I've never received much feedback on the site, so thats
quite useful. Replies below ...
On 12/12/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A few files still refer to jakarta for stuff that has moved to commons TLP:
>
> build.properties.sample
> doap_scxml.rdf
> faq.fml
> scxml-document
On 14/12/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: psteitz
> Date: Thu Dec 13 18:00:35 2007
> New Revision: 604085
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=604085&view=rev
> Log:
> Javadoc fixes.
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/pool/im
On Dec 14, 2007 12:19 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14/12/2007, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > > On Dec 14, 2007 6:35 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Seems like a bad idea to me, but I might not be
On Dec 14, 2007 12:04 PM, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > On Dec 14, 2007 6:35 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Seems like a bad idea to me, but I might not be understanding it
> > > correctly.
> > >
> > > 1) Does
On 14/12/2007, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > On Dec 14, 2007 6:35 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Seems like a bad idea to me, but I might not be understanding it
> > > correctly.
> > >
> > > 1) Does this mean t
Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Dec 14, 2007 6:35 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Seems like a bad idea to me, but I might not be understanding it correctly.
> >
> > 1) Does this mean the LICENSE and NOTICE file are not sitting in svn
> > next to the source?
This vote has passed with the following votes:
+1 Jörg Schaible
+1 Ben Speakmon
+1 Dennis Lundberg
+1 Niall Pemberton
Thanks, I can move the release over from the SNAPSHOT repo to the
official m2 repo with a maven command right? I'll go search the
archives for hints how to do this - but if anyone
On Dec 14, 2007 6:35 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems like a bad idea to me, but I might not be understanding it correctly.
>
> 1) Does this mean the LICENSE and NOTICE file are not sitting in svn
> next to the source?
Yes it does mean that - the LICENSE file comes from an apac
27 matches
Mail list logo
