Re: [pool][dbcp] instrumentation

2007-12-08 Thread Phil Steitz
On Dec 8, 2007 6:44 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 20/11/2007, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 20, 2007 2:30 AM, Jörg Schaible > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Phil Steitz wrote: > > > > On Nov 19, 2007 11:46 PM, Jörg Schaible > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: [pool][dbcp] instrumentation

2007-12-08 Thread sebb
On 20/11/2007, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 20, 2007 2:30 AM, Jörg Schaible > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Phil Steitz wrote: > > > On Nov 19, 2007 11:46 PM, Jörg Schaible > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > >> Phil Steitz wrote: > > [snip] > > >>> Any other comments on

Re: [dbcp] update pool dependency to 1.4-SNAPSHOT?

2007-12-08 Thread sebb
On 09/12/2007, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 8, 2007 6:01 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 09/12/2007, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 8, 2007 5:28 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What is poll 1.4-SNAPSHOT built from? I could not find

Re: [dbcp] update pool dependency to 1.4-SNAPSHOT?

2007-12-08 Thread Phil Steitz
On Dec 8, 2007 6:01 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 09/12/2007, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 8, 2007 5:28 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What is poll 1.4-SNAPSHOT built from? I could not find a tag/branch for > > > it. > > > > > > > It is built from svn t

Re: [dbcp] update pool dependency to 1.4-SNAPSHOT?

2007-12-08 Thread sebb
On 09/12/2007, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 8, 2007 5:28 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What is poll 1.4-SNAPSHOT built from? I could not find a tag/branch for it. > > > > It is built from svn trunk. We should probably move the composite > package to a new 2.0 branch or

Re: [dbcp] update pool dependency to 1.4-SNAPSHOT?

2007-12-08 Thread Phil Steitz
On Dec 8, 2007 5:28 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is poll 1.4-SNAPSHOT built from? I could not find a tag/branch for it. > It is built from svn trunk. We should probably move the composite package to a new 2.0 branch or start a 1.4 release branch. > If it is trunk, then there might

Re: [dbcp] update pool dependency to 1.4-SNAPSHOT?

2007-12-08 Thread sebb
What is poll 1.4-SNAPSHOT built from? I could not find a tag/branch for it. If it is trunk, then there might be a problem as there seem to be several Java 1.5 dependencies (asserts). On 09/12/2007, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone have any problems with this change as we work towar

[dbcp] update pool dependency to 1.4-SNAPSHOT?

2007-12-08 Thread Phil Steitz
Anyone have any problems with this change as we work toward pool 1.4 and dbcp 1.3 concurrently? Phil - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [all] Commons SCXML 0.7 RC1 available

2007-12-08 Thread sebb
On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/8/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I've been adding clirr reports after the fact (running clirr at > > > command line) so folks can glance at changes. I agre

Re: [all] Commons SCXML 0.7 RC1 available

2007-12-08 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 12/8/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I've been adding clirr reports after the fact (running clirr at > > command line) so folks can glance at changes. I agree it would be good > > to add a report to the site, I'll need to loo

Re: [all] Commons SCXML 0.7 RC1 available

2007-12-08 Thread sebb
On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks a lot for the feedback. Replies below ... > > On 12/8/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Tag: > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/scxml/tags/SC

Re: [all] Commons SCXML 0.7 RC1 available

2007-12-08 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Thanks a lot for the feedback. Replies below ... On 12/8/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tag: > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/scxml/tags/SCXML_0_7_RC1/ > > > > Artifacts: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~ra

Re: [all] Commons SCXML 0.7 RC1 available

2007-12-08 Thread sebb
On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tag: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/scxml/tags/SCXML_0_7_RC1/ > > Artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/scxml-0.7/rc1/ There's a clirr report here - does that not belong under the site structure? Also

[all] Commons SCXML 0.7 RC1 available

2007-12-08 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/scxml/tags/SCXML_0_7_RC1/ Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/scxml-0.7/rc1/ Staged site: http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/scxml-0.7/rc1/site/ Notes: * m1 release, JDK 1.4 minimum * v0.7 release notes, Javadoc etc.

Re: [all] m2 release process

2007-12-08 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 12/7/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For releases support artifacts that reside only in the Central repo > (parent poms, skin) I have simply done: > - vote based on svn revisions > - mvn release:prepare > - mvn -Prelease release:perform > This makes sense. However, I think

Re: [all] m2 release process

2007-12-08 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 12/7/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK how about I just upload the artifacts manually - that seems the > simpest solution. Sounds good. Do the jars contain LICENSE / NOTICE files? Just saw that skin-1.0 jars do not! > Then we can do a commons-parent release removing the

Re: [CLI2] Patch for CVS Unit Test in CLI2 Code

2007-12-08 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi, (I am not an active CLI committer, but have some interest in this component.) The best way of providing patches is by creating a new ticket in our bug tracking system Jira [1]. This guarantees that the stuff won't get lost in the high traffic of the mailing list. Thanks Oliver [1] http://co