On Nov 19, 2007 11:46 PM, Jörg Schaible
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Phil Steitz wrote:
> > On 11/19/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> sebb wrote:
> >>
> >>> Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been working on adding logging to pool and dbcp per previous
>
On Nov 19, 2007 10:08 AM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2007 6:10 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Lots of work have been realized towards 1.2 release for commons-math. The
> > online
> > snapshot does not reflect this however. It was last updated in late ju
Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/19/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>>
>>> Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been working on adding logging to pool and dbcp per previous
discussion here. I started with a partially instrumented version
of pool 1.3
You probably want to bring this up with the infrastructure folks. The
use of "current" links was originally requested / recommended by the
folks that manage the mirrors, quite a few years ago. Yours is not the
first comment I've seen that suggests they could cause problems, so it
would be good to g
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> > On 11/19/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> sebb wrote:
> >
> >>> There does not seem to have been a final decision (or even summary) of
> >>> the e-mail thread, which is a pity. Probably ought to
On Nov 19, 2007 10:31 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Three things:
>
> 1. Why change the versioning scheme for the skin? ( 1.1-SNAP -> 2-SNAP )
> Do you feel that it is more like a parent pom than a component? The
> skins that are maintained by the Maven project use x.y.x versions
Tickets and patches - see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS/fixforversion/12312131.
Thanks for the interest - look forward to your input. Apologies in
advance for the speed ... I'm the only real committer at the moment, and
do not have much time to spare - however, I am trying
Three things:
1. Why change the versioning scheme for the skin? ( 1.1-SNAP -> 2-SNAP )
Do you feel that it is more like a parent pom than a component? The
skins that are maintained by the Maven project use x.y.x versions.
2. Did you mean to remove the license from site.css?
3. Would you mind
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 11/19/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sebb wrote:
There does not seem to have been a final decision (or even summary) of
the e-mail thread, which is a pity. Probably ought to be on the
developer section of the commons site.
Consensus was not reached, so
To Whom It May Concern:
Why is it necessary to throw a new SQLException("Already closed") when
the purpose of the close() method is to close the connection. Seems to
me this Exception is not necessary.
In my code (Tomcat/DBCP/iBATIS) apparently iBATIS is trying to close an
already closed connec
On 11/19/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > There does not seem to have been a final decision (or even summary) of
> > the e-mail thread, which is a pity. Probably ought to be on the
> > developer section of the commons site.
>
> Consensus was not reached, so I didn
On 11/19/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have been working on adding logging to pool and dbcp per previous
> > > discussion here. I started with a partially instrumented version of
> > > pool 1.3 that I have been usi
On 19/11/2007, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2007 5:58 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > New thread:
> >
> > >> Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> > >
> > >>> I'll change this. Should it be changed to "Apache Commons Logging" or
> > >>> simply "Commons Logging"? This
> We are, slowly, beginning such efforts.
>
> Towards your specific question about Commons Collections, see this
> branch (long URL, may get fragmented):
>
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/collections/branches/collections_jdk5_branch/
>
> -Rahul
If I'd like to contribute, what's
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sebb wrote:
The readme files under:
http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/logging/
say:
"Note: the larger size of the new downloads is due to improvement
On Nov 19, 2007 5:58 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> New thread:
>
> >> Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> >
> >>> I'll change this. Should it be changed to "Apache Commons Logging" or
> >>> simply "Commons Logging"? This is what we currently have:
> >>>
> >>> Specification-Title: Jakarta Com
New thread:
>> Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
>>> I'll change this. Should it be changed to "Apache Commons Logging" or
>>> simply "Commons Logging"? This is what we currently have:
>>>
>>> Specification-Title: Jakarta Commons Logging
>>> Specification-Vendor: Apache Software Foundation
>> I had a look
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> sebb wrote:
> >>> On 19/11/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: dennisl
> Date: Mon Nov 19 09:10:07 2007
> New Revision:
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> sebb wrote:
> >>> The readme files under:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/logging/
> >>>
> >>> say:
> >>>
> >>> "Note: the larger size of the new
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: dennisl
Date: Mon Nov 19 09:10:07 2007
New Revision: 596370
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596370&view=rev
Log:
Use the correct value fo
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 11/19/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hear what you are saying, but at the time the was not even status quo,
because there was no component that had been released with Maven 2.
Therefor it was difficult to copy/paste a solution from another component.
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sebb wrote:
The readme files under:
http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/logging/
say:
"Note: the larger size of the new downloads is due to improvement
documentation shipping with this new release. Those who have very
limit
On 11/19/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should LATKA have a distribution folder:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/latka/
>
> It seems to be the only dormant project with a dist directory.
>
My understanding is that [latka] never had a 1.0 / first release
(beyond the alpha). I think t
On 11/19/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I hear what you are saying, but at the time the was not even status quo,
> because there was no component that had been released with Maven 2.
> Therefor it was difficult to copy/paste a solution from another component.
>
Didn't [fileup
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 19/11/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Author: dennisl
> >> Date: Mon Nov 19 09:10:07 2007
> >> New Revision: 596370
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596370&view=rev
> >> Log:
> >> U
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
This i
On 11/19/07, Rijk van Haaften <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I couldn't find info on Commons & the new Java 5 language features, I
> decided to ask it here. Is there a policy on the use of them (Enum,
> Generics, Annotations) in commons code? Notably for collections, type-safety
> might be
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > The readme files under:
> >
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/logging/
> >
> > say:
> >
> > "Note: the larger size of the new downloads is due to improvement
> > documentation shipping with this new release. Those who
On 11/19/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
> > Also, to reduce tangents on vote threads, if you are going to roll the
> > distros again based on these changes, perhaps you can just point to
> > the files and let those who want to take a look do so without call
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> sebb wrote:
> >>> On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sebb wrote:
The readme files under:
http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/logging/
say:
"Note: the larger size of the new downloads is due to improvement
documentation shipping with this new release. Those who have very
limited band width may wish to download the raw jars instead."
However, the
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: dennisl
Date: Mon Nov 19 09:10:07 2007
New Revision: 596370
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596370&view=rev
Log:
Use the correct value for the X-Compile-Target-JDK manifestEntry.
Modified:
commons/proper/c
The document
http://commons.apache.org/releases/release.html
states in section 7 that symlinks should be created for the "current" release.
However, AIUI, symlinks don't work for mirrors and rsynch, so these
are just wasted diskspace on mirrors. [And wasted bandwidth when the
links are changed.]
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 11/19/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
I'll change this. Should it be changed to "Apache Commons Logging" or
simply "Commons Logging"? This is what we currently have:
Specification-Title: Jakarta Commons Logging
Specification-Vendo
On 11/19/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There seem to be quite a few old releases in various commons directories.
>
> I think these should be removed - this will prevent anyone
> accidentally downloading an older release, as well as making it easier
> to select the current release.
>
> Older
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1.
Changes since th
On 11/18/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure. Maybe I didn't 'svn up' locally between r595118 and tagging...
> I've seen that happen a couple of times in the past. The correct files
> were tagged though, so no big deal.
>
Ah, that makes sense. And yup, no big deal (just appe
On 11/19/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> >
> > I'll change this. Should it be changed to "Apache Commons Logging" or
> > simply "Commons Logging"? This is what we currently have:
> >
> > Specification-Title: Jakarta Commons Logging
> > Specification-Vendor
On 19/11/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: dennisl
> Date: Mon Nov 19 09:10:07 2007
> New Revision: 596370
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596370&view=rev
> Log:
> Use the correct value for the X-Compile-Target-JDK manifestEntry.
>
> Modified:
>commons/prope
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
This is the third attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1.
Changes since the last try:
- The manifest used in the artifacts now has the correct (non-SNAPSHOT)
version in it
Two of the manifests
sebb wrote:
> Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have been working on adding logging to pool and dbcp per previous
> > discussion here. I started with a partially instrumented version of
> > pool 1.3 that I have been using to investigate bug reports and test
> > performance. I used jdk
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1.
Changes since the last try:
- The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in the correct
place in all distributables
- A cou
On Nov 19, 2007 6:10 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Lots of work have been realized towards 1.2 release for commons-math. The
> online
> snapshot does not reflect this however. It was last updated in late july.
> How can I update it ? I suppose there is a dedicated maven2 target for
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> sebb wrote:
> >>> On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1.
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1.
Changes since the last try:
- The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in
sebb wrote:
On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1.
Changes since the last try:
- The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in the correct
place in all distributables
- A couple of minor bugs were f
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1.
> >>
> >> Changes since the last try:
> >> - The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE an
sebb wrote:
On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
This is the third attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1.
Changes since the last try:
- The manifest used in the artifacts now has the correct (non-SNAPSHOT)
version in it
Two of the manifests don't have versions:
jav
sebb wrote:
On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1.
Changes since the last try:
- The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in the correct
place in all distributables
- A couple of minor bugs were f
sebb wrote:
On 19/11/2007, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 19/11/2007, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some files in the tagged directory tree are not in the distribution zip:
xdocs
sebb wrote:
./collections/binaries/commons-collections-2.1.1.zip
./collections/binaries/commons-collections-3.1.zip
./collections/binaries/commons-collections-3.2.zip
./collections/source/commons-collections-2.1.1-src.zip
./collections/source/commons-collections-3.1-src.zip
./collections/source/c
The readme files under:
http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/logging/
say:
"Note: the larger size of the new downloads is due to improvement
documentation shipping with this new release. Those who have very
limited band width may wish to download the raw jars instead."
However, the raw jars are n
There seem to be quite a few old releases in various commons directories.
I think these should be removed - this will prevent anyone
accidentally downloading an older release, as well as making it easier
to select the current release.
Older releases are always available from the archives.
Below
Should LATKA have a distribution folder:
http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/latka/
It seems to be the only dormant project with a dist directory.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAI
The README files in http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/betwixt/ said:
Commons-Betwixt 0.8
This is the 0.8 version of commons-beanutils.
I've fixed that to commons-betwixt in the 3 files.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
On 19/11/2007, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19/11/2007, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > > On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Some files in the tagged directory tree are not in the distribution
>
On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1.
>
> Changes since the last try:
> - The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in the correct
> place in all distributables
> - A couple of minor bugs were fi
Hi,
As I couldn't find info on Commons & the new Java 5 language features, I
decided to ask it here. Is there a policy on the use of them (Enum,
Generics, Annotations) in commons code? Notably for collections, type-safety
might be an interesting feature. How about a branch of commons collections
t
On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1.
>
> Changes since the last try:
> - The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in the correct
> place in all distributables
> - A couple of minor bugs were fi
Hello,
Lots of work have been realized towards 1.2 release for commons-math. The online
snapshot does not reflect this however. It was last updated in late july.
How can I update it ? I suppose there is a dedicated maven2 target for that but
I don't know maven2 well and I don't know if there is a
On 19/11/2007, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Some files in the tagged directory tree are not in the distribution zip:
> > > >
> > > > xdocs/**
> > > > build-testing.xml
> >
On 19/11/2007, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been working on adding logging to pool and dbcp per previous
> discussion here. I started with a partially instrumented version of
> pool 1.3 that I have been using to investigate bug reports and test
> performance. I used jdk logging
sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Some files in the tagged directory tree are not in the distribution zip:
> > >
> > > xdocs/**
> > > build-testing.xml
> > > commons-logging-api.pom
> > > doap_logging.rdf
> > > PROPOSAL.html
64 matches
Mail list logo
