Re: [all] m2 style sheet

2007-11-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
OK I updated commons-skin - so people can try this out by using commons-parent 6-SNAPSHOT for a component http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=595723 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=595724 Niall On Nov 16, 2007 5:55 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Curren

Re: svn commit: r595632 - in /commons/proper/jexl/trunk: pom.xml src/assembly/ src/assembly/bin.xml src/assembly/src.xml src/site/ src/site/resources/ src/site/resources/images/ src/site/site.xml

2007-11-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Nov 17, 2007 1:10 AM, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I figure that things are going to get missed since there's been little > to no discussion I can recall in recent times on how, what, when it's > happening. The reality is its already been happening slowly. Ten components had workin

Re: svn commit: r595632 - in /commons/proper/jexl/trunk: pom.xml src/assembly/ src/assembly/bin.xml src/assembly/src.xml src/site/ src/site/resources/ src/site/resources/images/ src/site/site.xml

2007-11-16 Thread Dion Gillard
I figure that things are going to get missed since there's been little to no discussion I can recall in recent times on how, what, when it's happening. As a start: - Shouldn't things like the changes plugin issue management URL be in the parent POM? - Is there a working Javacc 4.0 plugin for mvn?

Re: A newbie question for SCXML and its persistence

2007-11-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Please move this to the user list if you reply (not a dev list topic). On 11/16/07, Hongming Xiao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rahul, > > Thanks for your clarification. It helps me a lot. I have one more question > related to this topic. > > I am wondering what is the right time to persist this SC

Re: [all] m2 style sheet

2007-11-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Off-topic, a quick TOHT to you, for crunching through all components' m2 builds. -Rahul On 11/16/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Currently each component's m1 build has a project.css style sheet > which imports "http://commons.apache.org/style/commons-maven.css";. > This allows

Re: [logging] svn commit: r595123 - in /commons/proper/logging/tags/commons-logging-1.1.1: ./ pom.xml xdocs/issue-tracking.xml xdocs/issue-tracking.xml.bak

2007-11-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 11/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: dennisl > Date: Wed Nov 14 15:23:22 2007 > New Revision: 595123 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=595123&view=rev > Log: > [maven-release-plugin] copy for tag commons-logging-1.1.1 > > Added: > commons/proper/logging/t

Re: A newbie question for SCXML and its persistence

2007-11-16 Thread Hongming Xiao
Rahul, Thanks for your clarification. It helps me a lot. I have one more question related to this topic. I am wondering what is the right time to persist this SCXMLExecutor object. I am asking since when I went through SCXML spec, I noticed that the event triggerred using action will be queued

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons Compress (Sandbox)

2007-11-16 Thread Continuum VMBuild Server
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=21887&projectId=176 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Fri 16 Nov 2007 09:14:05 -0800 Finished at: Fri 16 Nov 2007 09:14:43 -0800 Total time: 37s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Nu

Re: svn commit: r595632 - in /commons/proper/jexl/trunk: pom.xml src/assembly/ src/assembly/bin.xml src/assembly/src.xml src/site/ src/site/resources/ src/site/resources/images/ src/site/site.xml

2007-11-16 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Do you anticipate complications with a move ? Mvgr, Martin Dion Gillard wrote: > Hi all, > > is there a mandate for an m2 build for commons? > > On 11/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Author: niallp >> Date: Fri Nov 16 03:42:56 2007 >> New Revision: 595632 >> >> URL: http:

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons VFS

2007-11-16 Thread Continuum VMBuild Server
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=21902&projectId=171 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Fri 16 Nov 2007 09:40:47 -0800 Finished at: Fri 16 Nov 2007 09:41:43 -0800 Total time: 56s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Nu

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons VFS

2007-11-16 Thread Continuum VMBuild Server
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=21902&projectId=171 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Fri 16 Nov 2007 09:40:47 -0800 Finished at: Fri 16 Nov 2007 09:41:43 -0800 Total time: 56s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Nu

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons Compress (Sandbox)

2007-11-16 Thread Continuum VMBuild Server
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=21887&projectId=176 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Fri 16 Nov 2007 09:14:05 -0800 Finished at: Fri 16 Nov 2007 09:14:43 -0800 Total time: 37s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Nu

Re: svn commit: r595632 - in /commons/proper/jexl/trunk: pom.xml src/assembly/ src/assembly/bin.xml src/assembly/src.xml src/site/ src/site/resources/ src/site/resources/images/ src/site/site.xml

2007-11-16 Thread Dion Gillard
Hi all, is there a mandate for an m2 build for commons? On 11/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: niallp > Date: Fri Nov 16 03:42:56 2007 > New Revision: 595632 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=595632&view=rev > Log: > Add m2 build > > Added: > commons/prope

Re: svn commit: r595632 - in /commons/proper/jexl/trunk: pom.xml src/assembly/ src/assembly/bin.xml src/assembly/src.xml src/site/ src/site/resources/ src/site/resources/images/ src/site/site.xml

2007-11-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Nov 16, 2007 1:03 PM, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > is there a mandate for an m2 build for commons? No mandate but AIUI the aim is to move over to m2. Niall > On 11/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Author: niallp > > Date: Fri Nov 16 03:42:56 200