And I'll be more careful about vote-counting in the future. Being American,
you'd think I'd watch that stuff more carefully :)
On 9/28/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/28/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 29/09/2007, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 9
On 9/28/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29/09/2007, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I do not know which of these votes are binding/non-binding.
> >
> > To figure it out, cross reference with the committee-info.txt f
On 29/09/2007, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I do not know which of these votes are binding/non-binding.
>
> To figure it out, cross reference with the committee-info.txt file in
> svn-private:committers/board/
In which case, m
On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not know which of these votes are binding/non-binding.
To figure it out, cross reference with the committee-info.txt file in
svn-private:committers/board/
Though all you really need to do is show that there are 3 binding
votes there when
Ok, then I'll change mine to optional. Thanks for the clarification, Dennis.
On 9/28/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Optional means that you can use the product without these dependencies
> present. Take commons-logging as an example. It has optional
> dependencies on log4j and t
Here's a page with more details:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Optional means that you can use the product without these dependencies
present. Take commons-logging as an example. It has optional
dependencies on log4
Optional means that you can use the product without these dependencies
present. Take commons-logging as an example. It has optional
dependencies on log4j and the other logging implementations. In the real
world though it will only use one of these. So they are optional.
Provided means that tha
James Carman wrote:
> All,
>
> I believe it is time to move Commons Proxy out of the sandbox and into
> Commons Proper. It appears to be very close to a 1.0 release. This
> vote will be left open until 10/05/2007 18:00 EDT (that's my timezone
> :). So far, the votes are:
>
> Niall Pemberton:
All,
I believe it is time to move Commons Proxy out of the sandbox and into
Commons Proper. It appears to be very close to a 1.0 release. This
vote will be left open until 10/05/2007 18:00 EDT (that's my timezone
:). So far, the votes are:
Niall Pemberton: +1
Paul Benedict: +1
Ben Speakmon: +1
The dependencies are truly optional. I marked them as provided so
that they wouldn't get picked up transitively (as you stated) by
client projects. If they want to use the pieces of commons-proxy that
need those extra libs, then they can explicitly add them to their POM.
So, does that mean I sho
Using provided doesn't tell maven to ignore the dependency,
it just means that it's expected that the user will install it into his
local repository himself or that it will be on the same classloader as the
application when it's running. maven will still complain if it can't find
it.
Optional depe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Carman wrote:
> All,
Hi James,
>
> It's been a while since Commons Proxy has had any attention, but I
> have received two emails in the past two days about it. So, I would
> like to cut a 1.0 release for it.
A 1.0 would be excellent. I am also
Yeah; though personally I think you can start the vote with any of the
+1s here as presumed votes. ie) We don't have to revote - just list
them in the vote email.
Hen
On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What will be the process here? This is merely a proposal, so I guess
> we n
I think I have it down now. I reorganized everything this morning.
It looks like it's building correctly now.
On 9/28/07, Joerg Hohwiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> James Carman wrote:
> > All,
> Hi James,
> >
> > How does the maven 2 build pi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Carman wrote:
> All,
Hi James,
>
> How does the maven 2 build pick up the files in the xdocs directory?
> I'm moving stuff around in commons proxy and I thought that the maven
> 2 build would not pick up my site stuff from the xdocs directory, b
What will be the process here? This is merely a proposal, so I guess
we need an official vote thread started after this. Should I go ahead
and start that now?
On 9/28/07, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> > +1 too.
> >
> > On 9/28/07, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL P
+1
Henri Yandell wrote:
+1 too.
On 9/28/07, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 nonbinding.
On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 9/28/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
-
To unsub
I think they're an old convenience that people have kept because
that's what people do with things that are not obviously broken.
I'm +1 to getting rid of them, I don't think they buy us anything, and
if they're a mirror issue then the sooner the better.
Anyone against rm'ing them? It should be p
On 28/09/2007, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are the current links touched by any scripts that generate sites, or are
> they merely a convenience? I have no problem removing them if it won't hurt
> anything.
Sorry, no idea.
But I removed the JMeter ones a while back, and have not been
+1 too.
On 9/28/07, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 nonbinding.
>
> On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On 9/28/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> >
> > -
Are the current links touched by any scripts that generate sites, or are
they merely a convenience? I have no problem removing them if it won't hurt
anything.
Also, I was working from the release docs -- we should update them with
stuff like this.
On 9/28/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I
+1 nonbinding.
On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 9/28/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EM
If you do stick with the xdocs/ directory, though, you'll have to override
the location of the site.xml (at least I did for maven 2 in the email
1.1release).
On 9/28/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, do I just copy my old
+1
On 9/28/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, do I just copy my old xdocs into the src/site directory and it'll
> pick it up as usual?
Yes - except navigation.xml - AFAIK maven2 uses site.xml - which is similar
Niall
> On 9/28/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/2
So, do I just copy my old xdocs into the src/site directory and it'll
pick it up as usual?
On 9/28/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > How does the maven 2 build pick up the files in the xdocs directory?
>
> I believ
On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What license header file should we be using? The one Commons Proxy
> currently has looks like this:
>
> /*
> * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
> * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
> * di
On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> How does the maven 2 build pick up the files in the xdocs directory?
I believe its maven2 magic - to make moving from maven1 as painless as possible.
> I'm moving stuff around in commons proxy and I thought that the maven
> 2 build wo
What license header file should we be using? The one Commons Proxy
currently has looks like this:
/*
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
* or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
* distributed with this work for additional information
* regarding
+1
All,
How does the maven 2 build pick up the files in the xdocs directory?
I'm moving stuff around in commons proxy and I thought that the maven
2 build would not pick up my site stuff from the xdocs directory, but
it does. I'd rather the xdocs stuff be placed in the src/site
directory instead (to
Sorry, folks. I'm moving some stuff around so that it's a more
standard, mavenized layout. I'll have this fixed shortly.
On 9/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Online report :
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8609&projectId=188
>
> Build statistics:
> State: F
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8609&projectId=188
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Fri 28 Sep 2007 04:33:21 -0700
Finished at: Fri 28 Sep 2007 04:34:00 -0700
Total time: 39s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Number:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Th
On 4/14/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Outside projects (currently my Syringe project and the "Crispy" project
> at sourceforge) are beginning to want to use Commons Proxy, but are finding
> it difficult since it's in the sandbox and no releases are available. I
> believe Proxy's AP
On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> It's been a while since Commons Proxy has had any attention, but I
> have received two emails in the past two days about it. So, I would
> like to cut a 1.0 release for it. I know I need to do a little work,
> since the site is a bit
I discovered recently that the "current" links in the parent directory
don't work properly on mirrors.
I suggest that these are removed.
E.g. at present all the current links on
http://mirror.public-internet.co.uk/apache/commons/email/
are copies of the 1.0 files.
I've not checked any other mi
All,
It's been a while since Commons Proxy has had any attention, but I
have received two emails in the past two days about it. So, I would
like to cut a 1.0 release for it. I know I need to do a little work,
since the site is a bit out-dated (the SVN links are incorrect) from
the TLP move. Wer
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affect
40 matches
Mail list logo
