Re: [VOTE] Release Email 1.1 (RC2)

2007-09-26 Thread Ben Speakmon
It wasn't verify_sigs fault; I just uploaded the wrong file. When I ran it on the files I downloaded from RC2/, it complained correctly. On 9/26/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All the MD5 and ASC files check out OK now. > > Why did verify_sigs not complain before? > If it's faulty, it nee

Re: [VOTE] Release Email 1.1 (RC2)

2007-09-26 Thread sebb
All the MD5 and ASC files check out OK now. Why did verify_sigs not complain before? If it's faulty, it needs to be fixed - or abandoned as a check. S. On 26/09/2007, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Turns out those assemblies had an outdated POM in them. I've rebuilt them > with the pom

Re: [VOTE] Release Email 1.1 (RC2)

2007-09-26 Thread Ben Speakmon
Turns out those assemblies had an outdated POM in them. I've rebuilt them with the pom tagged as RC2. Since there were no other changes, I replaced the broken ones in my RC2/ directory with the new ones. Can you please recheck? On 9/25/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, I've now got your

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

2007-09-26 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jaxme development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2007-09-26 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th