RE: [all][poll] How should nigthlies / CI work?

2007-08-26 Thread Jörg Schaible
Phil Steitz wrote on Saturday, August 25, 2007 7:00 PM: [snip] > So can I get some feedback on the "what to publish" question? > > 1. Most recent successful build only > 2. A stack of the n (probably = 5) most recent successful builds +1, do not build if nothing has changed. - Jörg --

Re: [all][poll] How should nigthlies / CI work?

2007-08-26 Thread Paul Benedict
I don't see a problem with having builds generated only on changes. I would prefer that. But will all of ASF do the same? I would find it difficult to determine what group is doing what: either nightly auto-builds or builds daily only on commit. Paul On 8/26/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: [all][poll] How should nigthlies / CI work?

2007-08-26 Thread Brett Porter
On 26/08/07, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Given that, isn't Gump producing something closer to what we want for > > nightly builds than Continuum? Why not use the Gump output for the > > nightlies? > > On the other hand, why produce a new nightly if nothing's changed? Yah, Continuum

Re: JIRA karma

2007-08-26 Thread Matt Benson
--- Sergey Vladimirov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt, > > I noticed your reply to one JIRA issue, but didn't > see your comments > regarding later issues. Hi Sergey--I just closed that one issue because that was something I knew I had meant to do. I haven't gotten to look at your latest iss

Re: [all][poll] How should nigthlies / CI work?

2007-08-26 Thread Henri Yandell
On 8/25/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/25/07, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 8/25/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Martin Cooper wrote: > > > > > > > > GUMP builds are deemed non-trusted, since GUMP downloads from > > > > > non-ASF sites a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2007-08-26 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-id (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2007-08-26 Thread Adam Jack
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1