Re: [PROPOSAL] add native container orchestration service

2017-01-31 Thread Lianghwa Jou
There are many container orchestrators. Those container orchestrators are happy to run on any VMs or bare metal machines. K8s is just one of them and there will be more in the future. It may not be a good idea to make CloudStack to be k8s aware. IMO, the relationship between k8s and cloudstack

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1922: CLOUDSTACK-9757: Fixed issue in traffic from ...

2017-01-31 Thread jayapalu
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1922 CLOUDSTACK-9757: Fixed issue in traffic from additional public subnet Acquire ip from additional public subnet and configure nat on that ip. After this pick any from that network and access

Re: [PROPOSAL] add native container orchestration service

2017-01-31 Thread Will Stevens
I think that is covered in this proposal. There is nothing k8s specific in this integration (from what I understand), all the k8s details are passed in via the cloud-init configuration after the cluster has been provisioned. On Jan 31, 2017 3:06 AM, "Lianghwa Jou" wrote: There are many containe

Re: [PROPOSAL] add native container orchestration service

2017-01-31 Thread Will Stevens
s/cloud-init/cloud-config/ On Jan 31, 2017 7:24 AM, "Will Stevens" wrote: > I think that is covered in this proposal. There is nothing k8s specific in > this integration (from what I understand), all the k8s details are passed > in via the cloud-init configuration after the cluster has been prov

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation

2017-01-31 Thread Will Stevens
Sorry, been swamped. I need to fix our Jenkins to support Java 8 to be able to continue validation on Java 8. On Jan 31, 2017 1:48 AM, "rhtyd" wrote: > Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741 > > Ping, update on this? > > > --- > If yo

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1905: CLOUDSTACK-9738: Optimize vm expunge process for ins...

2017-01-31 Thread nvazquez
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1905 @karuturi sure, done! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wish

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1923: CLOUDSTACK-9765: centos: packaging: fix missi...

2017-01-31 Thread resmo
GitHub user resmo opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1923 CLOUDSTACK-9765: centos: packaging: fix missing path in spec file Related to 6051fa503a2da7b96256f21e6b7c42aa1f3cb01e You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git

Re: CCC Miami Update

2017-01-31 Thread Wido den Hollander
> Op 29 januari 2017 om 19:41 schreef Will Stevens : > > > Hello Everyone, > I am sure most of you are aware at this point that a CloudStack > Collaboration Conference (CCC) is being hosted in Miami on May 16-18 by > ApacheCon. > Will the CloudStack conf be a full 3 days or maybe 1 or 2 days o

Bug #8544

2017-01-31 Thread Marty Godsey
I ran into this bug today and I don't see any movement on it. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8544 It was opened back in June of 2015 and is listed as still open for 4.9.2.0. Regards, Marty Godsey Principal Engineer nSource Solutions, LLC

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1794: added more guest os

2017-01-31 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1794 Ping, @karuturi can you squash your changes and rebase? Let's add the support in 4.10. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as w

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1924: CLOUDSTACK-9766 : Executing deleteSnapshot ap...

2017-01-31 Thread niteshsarda
GitHub user niteshsarda opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1924 CLOUDSTACK-9766 : Executing deleteSnapshot api with already deleted s… If we try to delete the snapshot which is already deleted, then no proper error appears in the log and it just try t