Re: [DISCUSS] Questions About deploy/ Directory and Vendor-Specific Artifacts

2025-05-06 Thread Ed Espino
I provided one approval for the PR. We need one more. Thank you Dianjin. -=e Ed Espino 925.389.4640 On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 8:59 PM Dianjin Wang wrote: > Hi, > > As there has been no further input from the community, I created a PR > to remove the unused files under the `deploy` dir: > https:

Re: [DISCUSS] Questions About deploy/ Directory and Vendor-Specific Artifacts

2025-05-06 Thread Dianjin Wang
Hi, As there has been no further input from the community, I created a PR to remove the unused files under the `deploy` dir: https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/pull/1090. Please help review it. I kept the `deploy/build` files unremoved as a revision base in the coming months to avoid creating t

Re: [DISCUSS] Questions About deploy/ Directory and Vendor-Specific Artifacts

2025-04-25 Thread Ed Espino
Hi Dianjin, Thanks for the detailed context and thoughtful suggestions. I agree with your assessment that much of the content under deploy/—particularly docker/, k8s/, script/, vagrant, cbdb_deploy.sh, and cbdb_env.sh—is outdated and not aligned with Cloudberry's current or future direction as a

Re: [DISCUSS] Questions About deploy/ Directory and Vendor-Specific Artifacts

2025-04-25 Thread Dianjin Wang
Hi Ed, Thanks for bringing this up — I’d like to contribute some context and suggestions as follows. Best, Dianjin Wang On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 5:32 AM Ed Espino wrote: > > - Is the `deploy/` directory still in active use or maintained? Files in `deploy/build/` were originally scattered under

[DISCUSS] Questions About deploy/ Directory and Vendor-Specific Artifacts

2025-04-24 Thread Ed Espino
Hi all, As part of an Apache RAT audit of the Cloudberry (Incubating) codebase, I’ve been reviewing the repository layout and came across the following directory: https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/tree/main/deploy This directory appears to contain deployment scripts and configurations that se