Re: [D] [Ideas] Submodule Pinning [cloudberry]

GitHub user ChaosEternal added a comment to the discussion: [Ideas] Submodule Pinning Hi Dianjin, If we care about eye friendly, as I suggested, we can put the branch or tag in the comment of the .gitmodules file and in the commit message. For checking, it is very hard to find out if an upstre

Re: [D] Add cloudberry-mcp-server for integration with LLM apps [cloudberry]

Hi all, I would be interested to know if there are any further thoughts or feedback from the wider community on this proposal. Feel free to reply to this thread or on GitHub Discussions. Best, Dianjin Wang On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 4:07 PM tuhaihe (via GitHub) wrote: > > GitHub user tuhaihe add

Re: [D] [Ideas] Submodule Pinning [cloudberry]

GitHub user tuhaihe added a comment to the discussion: [Ideas] Submodule Pinning Hey @ChaosEternal when reviewing the PR, I found it hard to compare the commit SHA with the corresponding branch, which will not be friendly for future review and maintenance. When referring to the `main/master`

Re: [DISCUSS] Questions About deploy/ Directory and Vendor-Specific Artifacts

I provided one approval for the PR. We need one more. Thank you Dianjin. -=e Ed Espino 925.389.4640 On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 8:59 PM Dianjin Wang wrote: > Hi, > > As there has been no further input from the community, I created a PR > to remove the unused files under the `deploy` dir: > https:

Re: [DISCUSS] Questions About deploy/ Directory and Vendor-Specific Artifacts

Hi, As there has been no further input from the community, I created a PR to remove the unused files under the `deploy` dir: https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/pull/1090. Please help review it. I kept the `deploy/build` files unremoved as a revision base in the coming months to avoid creating t

[DISCUSS] perfmon PR reuse of Greenplum gpperfmon code – community process & transparency

Hi all, I wanted to bring attention to the recent proposal and pull request introducing the perfmon extension for Cloudberry: Proposal: https://github.com/apache/incubator-cloudberry/discussions/1087 PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-cloudberry/pull/1085 After reviewing the PR, it appears

Re: [D] Introducing the [perfmon] Extension for Cloudberry Database Monitoring​ [cloudberry]

GitHub user edespino added a comment to the discussion: Introducing the [perfmon] Extension for Cloudberry Database Monitoring​ I’ve now reviewed the related PR (#1085), and a few important things came up that I want to bring back to this proposal thread: 🧬 Code Provenance It’s now evident th

Re: [D] Introducing the [perfmon] Extension for Cloudberry Database Monitoring​ [cloudberry]

GitHub user edespino added a comment to the discussion: Introducing the [perfmon] Extension for Cloudberry Database Monitoring​ @fanfuxiaoran - Thanks for the detailed proposal—this is exciting functionality. That said, the architecture and component naming (`gpmon`, `gpmmon`, `gpsmon`) seem