Re: [D] [Ideas] Remove Bundled Python Packages in Cloudberry Main Repo [cloudberry]

GitHub user tuhaihe added a comment to the discussion: [Ideas] Remove Bundled Python Packages in Cloudberry Main Repo Here, I can provide more information based on the research work for the reference: | Packages | License| Used by

Anyone is using pylint during development or testing?

Hi all, Our repo has some bundled Python packages[1], one of which is `pylint-0.21.0.tar.gz`, which is under the GPL v2 license. Since the GPL v2 license is categorized as CatX[2], we cannot include `pylint` in our repo. We discussed this topic[3], such as removing these packages or using `ruff`

Re: [D] Cloudberry Command Center [cloudberry]

GitHub user tuhaihe added a comment to the discussion: Cloudberry Command Center For now, share one Cloudberry monitor repo by @gspiegelberg : https://github.com/gspiegelberg/cloudberry-mon , FYI. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/discussions/1046#discussioncomment-12797990 -

Re: [D] Cloudberry Command Center [cloudberry]

GitHub user my-ship-it added a comment to the discussion: Cloudberry Command Center Yes, we have already supported command center in commercial version and plan to open source it, you can see it is already in the roadmap: https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/discussions/868 GitHub link: http

Re: [Sudden Disappearance of Apache Cloudberry’s GitHub Discussions]

+1, I'm encountering the same problem. 张明礼 于2025年4月9日周三 11:19写道： > Hi, > > > It has come to my attention that the Apache Cloudberry GitHub repository’s > Discussion page https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/discussions has been > abruptly removed, resulting in the loss of all prior community di

Fwd: cloudberry.git: Error while running github feature from main:.asf.yaml

There is one error in the .asf.yaml, FYI. Also, the ASF infra team has helped report one issue on it: https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/issues/1035. We need to see how to fix it. Otherwise, we cannot enable the Wiki feature for Cloudberry because of the error. Best, Dianjin Wang --

Re: [Sudden Disappearance of Apache Cloudberry’s GitHub Discussions]

Hey, I just created a PR to bring the Discussions feature back: https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/pull/1039. Don't worry; it is still there, just disabled. I have no idea, but guess it should be related to the discussion here [1] - the asf.yaml processing way changed about a month ago. [1] htt

Re: [D] [Ideas] Remove Bundled Python Packages in Cloudberry Main Repo [cloudberry]

GitHub user edespino edited a comment on the discussion: [Ideas] Remove Bundled Python Packages in Cloudberry Main Repo @tuhaihe I'm curious whether anyone is currently using pylint during development or testing. Personally, I'm not aware of it being in active use. It might be worth cross-pos

Re:Large PR Merge Strategy – Recommended Practices for Apache Cloudberry (Incubating)

Hi all, My colleagues and I have internally discussed the option of using a "merge main" approach to bypass the "100+ commit rebase and merge problem". Why not "merge main"? - Non-linear History: Merging main would create a non-linear commit graph. - Impact on Git Bisect: This could com

Re: Large PR Merge Strategy – Recommended Practices for Apache Cloudberry (Incubating)

Hi Jiaqi, Thanks again for explaining the reasoning behind splitting the PAX PR. Your concerns about "merge main" are well-taken — it introduces non-linear history, complicates git bisect, and can lead to downstream integration issues. It's clear that the decision to split was made carefully under

Large PR Merge Strategy – Recommended Practices for Apache Cloudberry (Incubating)

Hi all, I’d like to raise a contribution workflow concern we're currently encountering in Apache Cloudberry (Incubating), and propose that we establish a preferred approach for handling similar situations going forward. Contributor *@jiaqizho* submitted a significant pull request: *#1002 – Featur

Re: Request to Add Coverity Scan Token to Cloudberry Repo Secrets

Hi all, There is one PR on adding the SonarQube workflow to the Cloudberry: https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/pull/1004. Need more reviewers to merge it. Appreciate your help! Best, Dianjin Wang On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 9:12 PM Dianjin Wang wrote: > > Yes, exactly. Hope we can make use of the

Re: [Sudden Disappearance of Apache Cloudberry’s GitHub Discussions]

Hey Ed, Thanks for your updates. Now the PAX PR[1] has 300+ commits in one single PR, cicd workflow passed, but cannot rebase and merge into the main branch - that's limited by the GitHub product[1]. We're thinking of splitting this huge PR into small PRs and tagging them `skip ci`. Hope this can

New committer onboarding pages added to the site

Hi all, We’ve recently added three new pages to the Cloudberry website `Team` module to help streamline the committer onboarding process: * Inviting New Committers: https://cloudberry.apache.org/team/new-committers A quick reference for PPMC members on the steps for inviting a new committer. * Q