+1
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 11:03:01PM +0100, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0.3 for release.
>
>
> sha1: a87055d56a33a9b17606f14535f48eb461965b82
>
> Git:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.0.3-tentative
>
> Maven Ar
+1 (hotfix with only security fix, private vote, private branch & private ci)
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 02:18:42PM +, bened...@apache.org wrote:
> One issue with this approach is that we are advertising that we are preparing
> a security release by preparing such a release candidate.
>
> I won
Looks good
One thing that might be missing is direction on if we should avoid making
method parameters and local variables `final` - this is inconsistent over the
code base, but I'd prefer not having them. If the method is large enough that
we might mistakenly reuse parameters/variables, we sho
+1
On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 08:39:10AM +0200, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.0.4 for release.
> This is from the (take4) test artifact.
>
> sha1: 052125f2c6ed308f1473355dfe43470f0da44364
> Git:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=re
+1
On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 08:37:38AM +0200, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 3.0.27 for release.
>
> sha1: 205366131484967a3a8a749f1d1d841c952127e8
> Git:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.0.27-tentative
> Maven Artifact
+1
On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 08:38:04AM +0200, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 3.11.13 for release.
>
> sha1: 836ab2802521a685efe84382cb48db56caf4478d
> Git:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.11.13-tentative
> Maven Artifa
+1
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 10:40:21PM +0100, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> Proposing the (second) test build of Cassandra 4.1.0 for release.
>
> sha1: f9e033f519c14596da4dc954875756a69aea4e78
> Git:
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.1.0-tentative
> Maven Ar
Staying slightly off topic - we'd also have to run upgrade tests for all these
upgrade combinations, including different storage compatibility mode settings,
that is going to be very expensive.
/Marcus
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 12:36:02PM GMT, Sam Tunnicliffe wrote:
> Maybe this is not the right
Same, -1
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 01:48:37PM GMT, Alex Petrov wrote:
> I agree that switching bracing style is not something worth entertaining. -1
> from me, too.
>
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2025, at 1:34 AM, Maxim Muzafarov wrote:
> > I'm leaning toward not changing the bracing style we already have
>
101 - 109 of 109 matches
Mail list logo