Please note that, yes, at time, there are discussion between
the PMC and the board which are done either or the board@ list
or in "private" on private@.
This is between the board and the PMC, of course.
However, why does it fall to the *board* to then bring that
conversation to "the public". Shou
Which is what was done: https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Cassandra.html
> On Nov 5, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Jeremy Hanna wrote:
>
> If the ASF is at risk with a single company allowed to dominate a project
> then why couldn't the approach have been something like: "great job on
> building a
us way to trivialize the
>> responses of others as to the point of their points being meaningless to
>> you. So either explain what this means, or accept the fact that you are as
>> Chris is exactly what people are claiming you to be. Abnoxious bullies more
>> interested
If this is your attempt to accept Chris' explanation, even if
you don't agree with it, then you have not quite succeeded.
If instead, this is your attempt to continue to heap fuel on
a fire, and be just as aggressive as you paint others to be, then
you have done quite well.
I don't expect that ot
"well written, cogent and on-topic" ... "reasoned rebuttal"
You keep on using those words. I don't think they mean
what you think they do. Some data points:
o " A lot of extra power, like it or not (I have a feeling you quite like it,
though)."
o "you are being hotheaded, impulsive, antagoni
> On Nov 6, 2016, at 12:57 PM, Jeff Jirsa wrote:
>
> hostile, unprofessional responses. One forwarded the example to board@ and
> private@ with a blanket statement about wanting to "jettison every single
> Datastax employee from the Apache Cassandra PMC". Another replied with
> "hammer time?"
And, as a reminder, this is my email in its entirety. Note
how when show in full, it is hardly the nefarious posting
one would have assumed from the small cutting shared so far.
"""
I've seen such issues come up before...
The problem is not, per se, that the issues pop up; it happens and
sometim
Some clarification.
Basically, there had been issues w/ DataStax and the PMC for a long,
long time. It came somewhat to a head in Aug when there was
a PR/Email about the "Cassandra Summit" with nary a mention
of Apache at all. None.
This was after months and months in trying to get DataStax to
ho
things. And THAT is
> a problem, too (and it¹s NOT on the same level as mark issues, but if the
> question is ³why did Datastax step back from the Apache Cassandra
> project², it certainly helps explain why a company might want to do that).
>
> Let¹s build a community,
