Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0.6

+1 Le mar. 23 août 2022 à 11:30, Andrés de la Peña a écrit : > +1 (nb) > > On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 at 06:14, Tommy Stendahl via dev < > dev@cassandra.apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 nb >> >> -Original Message- >> *From*: Brandon Williams > > >> *Reply-To*: dev@cassandra.apache.org >> *To*: dev >

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-20: Dynamic Data Masking

> > Is it typical for a masking feature to make no effort to prevent > unmasking? I’m just struggling to see the value of this without such > mechanisms. Otherwise it’s just a default formatter, and we should consider > renaming the feature IMO The security that Dynamic Data Masking is bringing i

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-20: Dynamic Data Masking

solution. However, there seems to be agreement that it is >> appropriate for obfuscating some data in some queries by some users. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 9:02 AM Benjamin Lerer wrote: >> >>> Is it typical for a masking feature to m

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-20: Dynamic Data Masking

Views (even only projection view) is a completely new feature with its own set of complexities and limitations. My first feeling is that it might not be as simple as it sounds. There are an important amount of use cases to cover. It will definitely require its own CEP. :-) I like Andrés' proposal.

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing support for java 8

I seem to recall some discussion about the fact that we took some shortcuts when introducing java11 support. Before removing java8 support we should probably make sure that we have cleaned those things. My understanding was that it would be part of the work related to adding support for java 17 but

Re: [DISCUSS] LWT UPDATE semantics with + and - when null

The approach 2) is the one used by CQL operators. SELECT v + 1 FROM t WHERE pk = 1; Will return null if the row exists but the v is null. Le mer. 31 août 2022 à 18:05, David Capwell a écrit : > Sounds like matching SQL is the current favor, the current patch matches > this so will leave this th

Re: [DISCUSS] CEP-20: Dynamic Data Masking

A Le mer. 7 sept. 2022 à 17:02, Jeremiah D Jordan a écrit : > A > > On Sep 7, 2022, at 8:58 AM, Benedict wrote: > > Well, I am not convinced these changes will materially impact the outcome, > but at least we’ll have some extra fun collating the votes. > > > On 7 Sep 2022, at 14:05, Andrés de l

Re: [VOTE] CEP-20: Dynamic Data Masking

+1 Le lun. 19 sept. 2022 à 14:59, Ekaterina Dimitrova a écrit : > > +1 > > On Mon, 19 Sep 2022 at 8:42, J. D. Jordan > wrote: > >> +1 nb >> >> > On Sep 19, 2022, at 6:50 AM, Berenguer Blasi >> wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> >> On 19/9/22 13:39, Brandon Williams wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> Kind R

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1

+1 Le ven. 30 sept. 2022 à 08:11, Miklosovic, Stefan < stefan.mikloso...@netapp.com> a écrit : > +1 > > > From: Mick Semb Wever > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 15:13 > To: dev > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-beta1 > > NetApp Security WA

Re: [VOTE] Revising release gating criteria and CI systems

+1 Le mar. 11 oct. 2022 à 09:51, Mick Semb Wever a écrit : > > +1 > > > > On Sat, 8 Oct 2022 at 14:31, Josh McKenzie wrote: > >> DISCUSS thread: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/o166v7nr9lxnzdy5511tv40rr9t6zbrw >> >> Revise Release Lifecycle cwiki page ( >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.0.28

+1 Le ven. 21 oct. 2022 à 10:27, Miklosovic, Stefan < stefan.mikloso...@netapp.com> a écrit : > +1 > > > From: Mick Semb Wever > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 19:53 > Cc: dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.0.28 > > NetApp Security WAR

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.11.14

+1 Le ven. 21 oct. 2022 à 10:27, Miklosovic, Stefan < stefan.mikloso...@netapp.com> a écrit : > +1 > > > From: Mick Semb Wever > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 19:53 > Cc: dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.11.14 > > NetApp Security WA

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0.7

+1 Le ven. 21 oct. 2022 à 10:27, Miklosovic, Stefan < stefan.mikloso...@netapp.com> a écrit : > +1 > > > From: Mick Semb Wever > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 19:54 > To: dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.0.7 > > NetApp Security WARN

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1-rc1

+1 Le ven. 18 nov. 2022 à 16:50, Mick Semb Wever a écrit : > +1 > > Checked > - signing correct > - checksums are correct > - source artefact builds (JDK 8+11) > - binary artefact runs (JDK 8+11) > - debian package runs (JDK 8+11) > - debian repo runs (JDK 8+11) > - redhat* package runs (JDK 8+1

[DISCUSS] Adding dependency to the Big-Math library from eobermuhlner

Hi everybody, I wanted to discuss the addition of the Big-Math library( http://eobermuhlner.github.io/big-math/) as a dependency by CASSANDRA-17221 which add support for abs, exp, log, log10, and round Math function. The library was added fo

Re: [DISCUSS] API modifications and when to raise a thread on the dev ML

Thanks for opening this thread Josh, It seems perfectly normal to me that for important changes or questions we raise some discussion to the mailing list. My understanding of the current proposal implies that for the 4.1 release we should have had to raise over 70 discussion threads. We have a m

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1.0 GA

+1 Le lun. 5 déc. 2022 à 11:02, Berenguer Blasi a écrit : > +1 > On 5/12/22 10:53, guo Maxwell wrote: > > +1 > > Mick Semb Wever 于2022年12月5日 周一下午5:33写道： > >> >> Proposing the test build of Cassandra 4.1.0 GA for release. >> >> sha1: b807f97b37933fac251020dbd949ee8ef245b158 >> Git: >> https://git

Re: [DISCUSS] API modifications and when to raise a thread on the dev ML

viewed for weeks or months, and finally >>> committed, and still they are questioned shortly after that cycle, and >>> asked to be changed or discussed again. I don't think that an avalanche of >>> DISCUSS threads is going to improve that, since usually the problem

Re: [DISCUSS] API modifications and when to raise a thread on the dev ML

why I do not monitor these topics and propose > DISCUSS threads based on activities others are undertaking? This doesn’t > seem like the right approach to me, but if we do not come to some policy > approach here, I will try to schedule some time each quarter to scan for > topic

Re: [DISCUSS] API modifications and when to raise a thread on the dev ML

I am sorry but I still do not understand what problem we are trying to solve. All examples given so far have been about significant features which we already discuss on this mailing not about minor changes that happen multiple times per week. Is it a trust issue ?

Re: [DISCUSS] API modifications and when to raise a thread on the dev ML

. Admitting that API design can genuinely benefit from user input and > input of others in general, to me, is productive humility - a sign of > maturity. It’s not a reason to be offended. > > > On 6 Dec 2022, at 13:53, Benjamin Lerer wrote: > > > > I am sorry but I still do not

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 4.1.0 GA

> > Given that we're talking about two one-liners, just changing time units, > what are folks thoughts about skipping rc2 and just re-cutting 4.1.0 (GA) ? It sounds reasonable to me. Le mar. 6 déc. 2022 à 22:36, Aleksey Yeshchenko a écrit : > Sure. > > On 6 Dec 2022, at 18:14, Mick Semb Wever

Re: [DISCUSS] Usage of "var" instead of types in the code

I recently faced some var usage in the CQL layer part where it was making the code pretty hard to understand. I am in favor of prohibiting it. Le mar. 29 oct. 2024 à 20:32, Caleb Rackliffe a écrit : > Josh's example of "good" usage seems defensible, because the declared type > is already obfusca

Re: [VOTE] CEP-43: Apache Cassandra CREATE TABLE LIKE

+1 Le ven. 8 nov. 2024 à 18:31, Yifan Cai a écrit : > +1 (nb) > > - Yifan > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 10:31 PM guo Maxwell wrote: > >> Thanks Stefan and Dinesh. Let's wait a little longer. >> >> >> Dinesh Joshi 于2024年11月7日周四 23:56写道： >> >>> Maxwell, here's the documentation for project governan

Re: [DISCUSS] Index selection syntax for CASSANDRA-18112

I am personally -1 against the approach taken by DS for optimizing SAI queries. I consider it as a quick fix rather than a proper long term solution. The issue with this approach is that it splits the optimisation logic of queries. With one part of the optimization happening on the coordinator whil

Re: Welcome David Capwell as Cassandra PMC Member!

Congratulations, David! Le mar. 29 avr. 2025 à 08:35, Mick Semb Wever a écrit : > Welcome David! > > On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 at 21:10, Jon Haddad wrote: > >> Hey everyone! >> >> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Cassandra is delighted >> to announce that David Capwell has joined the

Re: Welcome Jeremiah Jordan to the PMC

Congrats! Le lun. 17 févr. 2025 à 17:50, Christopher Bradford a écrit : > Well done JD! > > On Feb 17, 2025, at 7:08 AM, Piotr Kołaczkowski > wrote: > > Congrats Jeremiah! > > Wiadomość napisana przez Berenguer Blasi w > dniu 17.02.2025, o godz. 07:23: > > Congrats JD!! :-) > On 16/2/25 20:52,

Re: Welcome Caleb Rackliffe to the PMC

Congratulations! Le sam. 22 févr. 2025 à 13:41, Dmitry Konstantinov a écrit : > Congratulations Caleb! > > On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 23:21, Yifan Cai wrote: > >> Congrats Caleb! >> -- >> *From:* Štefan Miklošovič >> *Sent:* Friday, February 21, 2025 11:44:42 AM >> *To:

Re: [VOTE][IP CLEARANCE] Spark-Cassandra-Connector

+1 Le mar. 18 mars 2025 à 19:02, Bernardo Botella a écrit : > +1 (nb) > > On Mar 18, 2025, at 10:52 AM, Yifan Cai wrote: > > +1 (nb) > > -- > *From:* Jeremiah Jordan > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 18, 2025 10:32:14 AM > *To:* dev@cassandra.apache.org > *Cc:* gene...@incu

Re: Welcome Abe Ratnofsky as Cassandra committer!

Congrats Abe! Le lun. 12 mai 2025 à 20:15, Marouan REJEB a écrit : > Congratulations ! > > Le lun. 12 mai 2025 à 20:10, Yifan Cai a écrit : > >> Congratulations Abe! 🥳 >> >> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 11:07 AM Jaydeep Chovatia < >> chovatia.jayd...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Congrats Abe! >>> >>> On

<    1   2   3   4   5