I feel like a group of us discussed this IRL a bit at ApacheCon in Vegas ~
2019 maybe? Anyhoo, the tidbit sticking in my mind was someone explaining
the string operations overhead in the JVM of log concatenation vs slapping
binary to CQ’s off heap-and-append operation was substantial.
We could hos
Is there any update on this topic? It seems that things can make a big
progress if Jake Luciani can find someone who can make the
FileSystemProvider code accessible.
Jon Haddad 于2023年12月16日周六 05:29写道：
> At a high level I really like the idea of being able to better leverage
> cheaper storage
> When it comes to alternatives, what about logback + slf4j? It has
> appenders where we want, it is sync / async, we can code some nio appender
> too I guess, it logs it as text into a file so we do not need any special
> tooling to review that. For tailing which Chronicle also offers, I guess
> "
The test builds of Cassandra 4.0.14, 4.1.7 and 5.0.1, are available.
A vote of this test build will be initiated within the next couple of days.
== 4.0.14 ==
sha1: 7bf67349579411521bcdee4febd209cff63179a6
Git: https://github.com/apache/cassandra/tree/4.0.14-tentative
Maven Artifacts:
https://repo
Do you have any new updates on this DISCUSS ?
- The reason this pattern is popular is it allows extension of
functionality ahead of the database. Some people copy to a NAS/SAN. Some
people copy to S3. Some people copy to their own object storage that isn’t
s3 compatible. “Compress and move” is su
