On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 5:51 PM Fleming, Jackson via dev
wrote:
> Primarily this would be moving from x86 instances to Graviton ARM based ones,
> as we’ve seen a pretty good uptake of ARM usage, and we’d like to help ensure
> that there’s good testing coverage across both x86 and ARM architectur
Hi,
Strong +1 as well. It's a pretty critical dependency in the path of testing and
committing changes. Supporting integration points for alternative distributions
of Cassandra is something I think we should generally be supportive as it's
generally an opportunity to make things more modular an
Hi,
There is definitely a mismatch between how the full range of dtests work and
the direction CCM is going in and we have some difficulty getting those to
match. I fully empathize with several of those CI systems not being publicly
visible/accessible, and the behavior of upgrade paths being ab
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 9:07 AM Brandon Williams wrote:
> I just want to note that this will reduce the x86 pool from 42 to 31,
Or more correctly, the pool will go from 42 to 33 x86 agents.
Kind Regards,
Brandon
Jackson,
we are very thankful for all the donations from Instaclustr. Getting
people (and resources) involved in ARM maintenance and testing is
desperately needed. More detailed feedback below.
On Fri, 24 May 2024 at 16:08, Brandon Williams wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 5:51 PM Fleming,
> The scripts that are in cassandra-builds seem like a starting point for
> converging different CI systems so that they run the same set of tests in as
> similar environments as possible
Yeah, I took a superset of circle and ASF tests to try and run :allthethings:.
Part of how the checkstyle de
+1
Le jeu. 23 mai 2024, 21:30, Brandon Williams a écrit :
> +1
>
> Kind Regards,
> Brandon
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 5:59 PM Bret McGuire
> wrote:
> >
> >Greetings all! We're going to give this another go.
> >
> >Apologies for the confusion that sprang out of our last attempt. It
>
Thanks Brandon and Mick,
This is exactly the feedback I was looking for, the last thing we want to do is
reduce the throughput of the already strained CI pipelines.
Sounds like it's a bigger task than just cutting over to ARM, just want to
reassure you Brandon we certainly won't change anything
Thank you for all the opinions. That is useful for future work on CCM.
When I implemented the changes that caused recent headaches, I wasn't aware
that the CCM code was so patchworked, which resulted in many surprises. I
apologize for that. Anyway, there is no reason to sit and complain instead
of
BTW. I've created a simple workflow for GitHub Actions -
https://github.com/riptano/ccm/pull/771 - feel free to review
- - -- --- - -
Jacek Lewandowski
sob., 25 maj 2024 o 06:09 Jacek Lewandowski
napisał(a):
> Thank you for all the opinions. That is useful for future w
10 matches
Mail list logo
