Hello everyone,
As there is a lack of feedback for an option to go on with and having
a discussion for pros and cons for each option I tend to agree with
the vision of this problem proposed by David :-) After a lot of
discussion on Slack, we came to the @ValidatedBy annotation which
points to a v
Distant future people will not be happy about this, I can already tell you now.
Sounds like a reasonable improvement to me however.
> On 23 Jun 2023, at 07:22, Berenguer Blasi wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> DeletionTime.markedForDeleteAt is a long useconds since Unix Epoch. But I
> noticed that with
If we’re doing this, why don’t we delta encode a vint from some per-sstable
minimum value? I’d expect that to commonly compress to a single byte or so.
> On 23 Jun 2023, at 12:55, Aleksey Yeshchenko wrote:
>
> Distant future people will not be happy about this, I can already tell you
> now.
>
It's a possibility. Though I haven't coded and benchmarked such an
approach and I don't think I would have the time before the freeze to
take advantage of the sstable format change opportunity.
Still it's sthg that can be explored later. If we can shave a few extra
% then that would always be
I'll take engagement. Even if it's broadly disagreement. :D
(Full disclosure, I have a weak opinion here held weakly):
> Wouldn’t we recommend people to use the test images the project CI use? Thus
> using in testing the versions we use? I would assume the repeatable CI will
> still expect test
+1 here on inclusion by default.
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023, at 2:01 AM, Dinesh Joshi wrote:
> This would be a good addition and would make Cassandra more performant out of
> the box.
>
> Dinesh
>
>> On Jun 22, 2023, at 9:45 PM, Jordan West wrote:
>>
>> Glad to see there is support for this! I th
> If we’re doing this, why don’t we delta encode a vint from some per-sstable
> minimum value? I’d expect that to commonly compress to a single byte or so.
+1 to this approach.
> Distant future people will not be happy about this, I can already tell you
> now.
Eh, they'll all be AI's anyway and
Sounds like you were assuming the effort would require 3 Ekaterina?
Thank you Josh.
Yes, you are totally right. I forgot for a moment that the new scripts are
layered. Valid point about 2.
Now the question is how fast 2 will be to run it and how many people would
actually use it for running
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 8:36 AM Josh McKenzie wrote:
> How frequently do we see failures in tests (straight failure, flakes, etc)
> that are due to the versions of dependencies (JDK or python) that we're
> running the tests with?
>
> Regardless of 1, if the answer to 2 is "almost never", then th
Great addition! +1 (nb)
On 2023/06/23 13:37:02 Josh McKenzie wrote:
> +1 here on inclusion by default.
>
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2023, at 2:01 AM, Dinesh Joshi wrote:
> > This would be a good addition and would make Cassandra more performant out
> > of the box.
> >
> > Dinesh
> >
> >> On Jun 22, 2
+1 to ACCP - we love performance.
From: David Capwell
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2023 4:21 PM
To: dev
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] Using ACCP or tc-native by default
+1 to ACCP
On Jun 22, 2023, at 3:05 PM, C. Scott Andreas wrote:
+1 for ACCP and can attest
11 matches
Mail list logo
