Hi Justin,
You are probably right, but as far as I am aware you are not an official source
of ASF policy on this matter. The official policy pages do not stipulate this,
so I would appreciate if you could get them updated to accord more clearly your
beliefs before the project makes the necessar
Hi,
> You are probably right, but as far as I am aware you are not an official
> source of ASF policy on this matter.
I am currently assistant VP legal affairs and have made changes to ASF policy
before, in particular to the release and distribution policy. I guess you are
asking for something
> I guess you are asking for something official from VP Legal Affairs or the
> ASF board? If so I can make that happen.
I would prefer the official policy pages to be updated to have a clear
statement on this, so this problem can be solved in perpetuity.
> IMO it does, the project can choose to
> I can only speak for myself, but I am happy to ensure future releases
> follow this policy once it is clearly stated as an official ASF policy by
> the official policy documentation.
>
+1
I recommend that the PMC continues its vote on 4.0-rc1.
With the understanding that the ASF updates the p
HI,
> I recommend that the PMC continues its vote on 4.0-rc1.
In that case I'll need to raise this issue with theASF board.
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
I thought you had indicated you were anyway raising this with the board?
Either way, I don't personally see any issue with delaying the vote by a week
or so if it will bring some official clarity to this issue, now it has been
raised. How quickly can we expect to see changes reflected in the off
>
> I thought you had indicated you were anyway raising this with the board?
>
> Either way, I don't personally see any issue with delaying the vote by a
> week or so if it will bring some official clarity to this issue, now it has
> been raised. How quickly can we expect to see changes reflected i
Hi,
> Given the same agreement there that the ASF's docs are unclear on the
> topic, and having to rely upon a post from Roy in *some thread, I think it
> is safe to say we can (if need be) continue until those docs are made up to
> date. Also, I cannot see how the ASF can enforce anything retroac
> This is not a retrospective change just a clarification on what should be
> self evident.
This is a non-sequitur surely? Can something that is self-evident need
clarifying? Or do you suppose it is self-evident to all besides the feeble
intellects of this community?
I think a self-evident pol
Thanks all. Really appreciate it :-)
On 27/3/21 0:24, Lorina Poland wrote:
> Just adding more congratulations, Berenguer! Well-deserved!
>
> Lorina Poland
> e. lor...@datastax.com
> w. www.datastax.com
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:17 PM Yifan Cai wrote:
>
>> Congratulations Berenguer!
>>
>>
10 matches
Mail list logo
