>
> "Make the scan faster"
> "Make the scan incremental and automatic"
> "Make it not blow up your page cache"
> "Make losing your base replicas less likely".
>
> There's a concrete, real opportunity with MVs to create integrity
> assertions we're missing. A dangling record from an MV that would po
> I agree with Jeff that there is some stuff to do to address the current MV
> issues and I am willing to focus on making them production ready.
+1
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 15:42, Benjamin Lerer
wrote:
> >
> > "Make the scan faster"
> > "Make the scan incremental and automatic"
> > "Make it not bl
I humbly suggest these are the wrong questions to ask. Instead, two sides of
just one question matter: how did we miss these problems, and what would we
have needed to do procedurally to have not missed it. Whatever it is, we need
to do it now to have confidence other things were not missed, a
Which questions and how we frame it aside, it's clear we have some
foundational thinking to do, articulate, and agree upon as a project before
we can reasonably make decisions about deprecation, promotion, or inclusion
of features in the project.
Is that fair?
If so, I propose we set this thread
I think coming up with a formal comprehensive guide for determining if we
can merge these sort of huge impacting features is a great idea.
I'm also on board with applying the same standard to the experimental
features.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 1:45 PM Joshua McKenzie wrote:
> Which questions and
+1
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 1:55 PM Jon Haddad wrote:
> I think coming up with a formal comprehensive guide for determining if we
> can merge these sort of huge impacting features is a great idea.
>
> I'm also on board with applying the same standard to the experimental
> features.
>
> On Wed, Jul
>
>
>
> If so, I propose we set this thread down for now in deference to us
> articulating the quality bar we set and how we achieve it for features in
> the DB and then retroactively apply them to existing experimental features.
> Should we determine nobody is stepping up to maintain an
> experime
Plays pretty cleanly into the "have a test plan" we modded in last month. +1
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 6:43 PM Nate McCall wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > If so, I propose we set this thread down for now in deference to us
> > articulating the quality bar we set and how we achieve it for features in
> > the
I've been in the Cassandra community for about 10 years now and I've seen a lot
of ups and downs. I care deeply about both the project and the people
interacting on the project personally. I consider many of you to be good
friends.
Regardless of the history that's caused some friction on rece
