Re: [VOTE] Project governance wiki doc (take 2)

2020-06-22 Thread Benjamin Lerer
+1 On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:54 AM Marcus Eriksson wrote: > +1 > > > On 22 June 2020 at 08:37:39, Mick Semb Wever (m...@apache.org) wrote: > > > - Vote will run through 6/24/20 > > - pmc votes considered binding > > - simple majority of binding participants passes the vote > > - committer and co

Re: [VOTE] Project governance wiki doc (take 2)

2020-06-22 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
+1 -- Sylvain On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:48 AM Benjamin Lerer wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:54 AM Marcus Eriksson > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > On 22 June 2020 at 08:37:39, Mick Semb Wever (m...@apache.org) wrote: > > > > > - Vote will run through 6/24/20 > > > - pmc votes considere

Re: [VOTE] Project governance wiki doc (take 2)

2020-06-22 Thread Sam Tunnicliffe
+1 > On 22 Jun 2020, at 08:54, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > > +1 > -- > Sylvain > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:48 AM Benjamin Lerer > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:54 AM Marcus Eriksson >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> On 22 June 2020 at 08:37:39, Mick Semb Wever (m...@apa

Re: [VOTE] Project governance wiki doc (take 2)

2020-06-22 Thread Benedict Elliott Smith
If you read the clauses literally there's no conflict - not all committers that +1 the change need to review the work. It just means that two committers have indicated they are comfortable with the patch being merged. One of the +1s could be based on another pre-existing review and trust in bo

Re: [VOTE] Project governance wiki doc (take 2)

2020-06-22 Thread Benedict Elliott Smith
Also, +1 On 22/06/2020, 11:23, "Benedict Elliott Smith" wrote: If you read the clauses literally there's no conflict - not all committers that +1 the change need to review the work. It just means that two committers have indicated they are comfortable with the patch being merged. One of

Re: [VOTE] Project governance wiki doc (take 2)

2020-06-22 Thread Aleksey Yeshchenko
+1 > On 20 Jun 2020, at 16:12, Joshua McKenzie wrote: > > Link to doc: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Apache+Cassandra+Project+Governance > > Change since previous cancelled vote: > "A simple majority of this electorate becomes the low-watermark for votes > in favour ne

Re: [VOTE] Project governance wiki doc (take 2)

2020-06-22 Thread Eric Evans
+0 On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 10:12 AM Joshua McKenzie wrote: > > Link to doc: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Apache+Cassandra+Project+Governance > > Change since previous cancelled vote: > "A simple majority of this electorate becomes the low-watermark for votes > in favour

Re: [VOTE] Project governance wiki doc (take 2)

2020-06-22 Thread Andrés de la Peña
+1 (nb) On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 at 17:15, Eric Evans wrote: > +0 > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 10:12 AM Joshua McKenzie > wrote: > > > > Link to doc: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Apache+Cassandra+Project+Governance > > > > Change since previous cancelled vote: > > "A si

Re: [VOTE] Project governance wiki doc (take 2)

2020-06-22 Thread Joseph Lynch
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 3:23 AM Benedict Elliott Smith wrote: > > If you read the clauses literally there's no conflict - not all committers > that +1 the change need to review the work. It just means that two > committers have indicated they are comfortable with the patch being merged. > One

Re: [VOTE] Project governance wiki doc (take 2)

2020-06-22 Thread Blake Eggleston
+1 > On Jun 20, 2020, at 8:12 AM, Joshua McKenzie wrote: > > Link to doc: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Apache+Cassandra+Project+Governance > > Change since previous cancelled vote: > "A simple majority of this electorate becomes the low-watermark for votes > in favour

Re: [VOTE] Project governance wiki doc (take 2)

2020-06-22 Thread Stefan Podkowinski
+1 On 22.06.20 20:12, Blake Eggleston wrote: +1 On Jun 20, 2020, at 8:12 AM, Joshua McKenzie wrote: Link to doc: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Apache+Cassandra+Project+Governance Change since previous cancelled vote: "A simple majority of this electorate becomes the

Re: [VOTE] Project governance wiki doc (take 2)

2020-06-22 Thread J. D. Jordan
+1 non-binding > On Jun 22, 2020, at 1:18 PM, Stefan Podkowinski wrote: > > +1 > >> On 22.06.20 20:12, Blake Eggleston wrote: >> +1 >> On Jun 20, 2020, at 8:12 AM, Joshua McKenzie wrote: >>> >>> Link to doc: >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Apache+Cassandra+Pro

Notes from Cassandra Kubernetes SIG 2020-06-18

2020-06-22 Thread Patrick McFadin
Hi everyone, Video and notes uploaded here. The tl;dr is that John Sanda has been working on a common CRD and advancing the conversation. We'll be meeting again this Thursday for another round of discussion. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/2020-06-18+Cassandra+Kubernetes+SIG

Contributor Meeting 2020-06-23

2020-06-22 Thread Patrick McFadin
Yes! That is tomorrow at 10AM PST. Zoom: https://datastax.zoom.us/j/390839037 Add any agenda items here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/2020-06-23+Apache+Cassandra+Contributor+Meeting I think it would be great to get an update on the governance doc under vote right now. ht