As per the announcement on 7th December 2018[1], ASF infra are planning to
shutdown the service behind git-wip-us.apache.org and migrate all existing
repos to gitbox.apache.org
There are further details in the original mail, but apparently one of the
benefits of the migration is that we'll hav
+1 for the migration.
Thanks for owning and leading this, Sam
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 02:58 Sam Tunnicliffe wrote:
> As per the announcement on 7th December 2018[1], ASF infra are planning to
> shutdown the service behind git-wip-us.apache.org and migrate all
> existing repos to gitbox.apache.or
+1
--
Jeff Jirsa
> On Jan 4, 2019, at 2:49 AM, Sam Tunnicliffe wrote:
>
> As per the announcement on 7th December 2018[1], ASF infra are planning to
> shutdown the service behind git-wip-us.apache.org and migrate all existing
> repos to gitbox.apache.org
>
> There are further details in
+1
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019, at 5:49 AM, Sam Tunnicliffe wrote:
> As per the announcement on 7th December 2018[1], ASF infra are planning
> to shutdown the service behind git-wip-us.apache.org and migrate all
> existing repos to gitbox.apache.org
>
> There are further details in the original mail,
+1
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 8:13 AM Ariel Weisberg wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019, at 5:49 AM, Sam Tunnicliffe wrote:
> > As per the announcement on 7th December 2018[1], ASF infra are planning
> > to shutdown the service behind git-wip-us.apache.org and migrate all
> > existing repos to gitb
This change will be forced on Feb 7, so a vote isn't really relevant :)
I'm in favor of sooner is better. Things are relatively quiet right now,
post-holidays. Let's do it Monday, for example, and we can work through
the config changes while most people are fresh from a break.
The longer we wait,
Yeah, I wasn’t really proposing a vote as like you said, it’s happening anyway.
I was just going to give a few days for people to chime in about timings,
seeing as some may still be afk after holidays etc. I’ll give it a little while
to at least maintain the illusion of waiting for consensus, bu
Silence can be interpreted either as non-awareness or implicit approval.
I interpreted (and meant) +1 as "go for it now".
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 8:48 AM Sam Tunnicliffe wrote:
> Yeah, I wasn’t really proposing a vote as like you said, it’s happening
> anyway. I was just going to give a few days
Patches:
cassandra - https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/297
cassandra-builds - https://github.com/apache/cassandra-builds/pull/8
cassandra-dtest - no git-wip usage found.
URL update for the DSL seed job repo should be the only change needed
there, after the above cassandra-builds commit.
- h
Great news, we can also remove this line: We cannot merge or close any pull
requests opened for the apache/cassandra repository, so please don't open
them.
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 1:27 PM Michael Shuler
wrote:
> Patches:
> cassandra - https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/297
> cassandra-build
The docs for Cassandra-3.11.3 have been added to the website:
- http://cassandra.apache.org/doc/3.11/
- http://cassandra.apache.org/doc/3.11.3/
These are not linked to from anywhere.
Next step it to regenerate the docs for Cassandra-4.0 (latest). I'll do this
next week if no one objects.
Be
11 matches
Mail list logo
