I don't see that we have reached sufficient consensus on this yet. We've
had a brief discussion about the pros and cons of in-tree cassandra vs
separate ASF repo here, but let's not frame it like it's either or. From
my perspective, there hasn't been any final decision yet whether the
proposed side
The thread for side car is months old and no one has opposed to it and hence
someone developed it. I am not sure how else you get consensus.
Regarding separate repo, how do we get consensus?
> On Aug 18, 2018, at 05:19, Stefan Podkowinski wrote:
>
> I don't see that we have reached sufficien
I think we do have some consensus that 1) we should give it a try to
have one or many side-car processes for non-essential features, and that
2) they should be developed in a separate repo. I'm also open to the
idea of accepting the proposed implementation as a possible side-car
solution and really
That’s a good point. Let’s review the patch and when it is ready to commit, we
can create the repo then.
> On Aug 18, 2018, at 14:04, Stefan Podkowinski wrote:
>
> I think we do have some consensus that 1) we should give it a try to
> have one or many side-car processes for non-essential featu
