Sorry,
This feature does not exist.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Ramesh Mani wrote:
> Hello Cassandra team members,
>
> I am looking for API via which I can get the CQL session query as string?
> Is there a way I can get the Query executed by the users via API
>
> Thanks,
> Ramesh
>
Hey all,
Following up on my emai
oops, hit sent too early. will send another email shortly
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Following up on my emai
>
Hey all,
Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0665f40c7213654e99817141972c003a2131aba7a1c63d6765db75c5@%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E),
I'd like to propose a vote to change to allow any potential contributor to
assign a jira to themselves without nee
+1 non-binding. That requirement always seemed silly to me.
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 8:21 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0665f40c7213654e99817141972c003a2131aba7a1c63d6765db75c5@%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.
+1 non-binding. I’ve always wondered why that restriction was in place.
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 8:21 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0665f40c7213654e99817141972c003a2131aba7a1c63d6765db75c5@%3Cdev.cass
non-binding +1, too.
—
Robert Stupp
@snazy
> On 29. Mar 2017, at 15:21, Jason Brown wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0665f40c7213654e99817141972c003a2131aba7a1c63d6765db75c5@%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E),
> I'd lik
non-binding +1
On 2017-03-29 15:21, Jason Brown wrote:
Hey all,
Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0665f40c7213654e99817141972c003a2131aba7a1c63d6765db75c5@%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E),
I'd like to propose a vote to change to allow any poten
+1
--
Jeff Jirsa
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 6:21 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0665f40c7213654e99817141972c003a2131aba7a1c63d6765db75c5@%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E),
> I'd like to propose a vote to
Non binding +1
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:22 AM Jeff Jirsa wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> Jeff Jirsa
>
>
> > On Mar 29, 2017, at 6:21 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0665f40c7213654e99817141972c003a21
Non binding +1
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Jonathan Haddad wrote:
> Non binding +1
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:22 AM Jeff Jirsa wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > --
> > Jeff Jirsa
> >
> >
> > > On Mar 29, 2017, at 6:21 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > Following up my thread f
+1
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Benjamin Lerer wrote:
> Non binding +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Jonathan Haddad
> wrote:
>
> > Non binding +1
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:22 AM Jeff Jirsa wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jeff Jirsa
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Mar 29, 2017,
+1
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 07:50, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Benjamin Lerer > wrote:
>
>> Non binding +1
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Jonathan Haddad
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Non binding +1
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 7:22 AM Jeff Jirsa wrote:
Hi,
I think we should support something that we can scale out and that can
produce consistent reproducible results.
One of the longer term issues is going to be different CI systems
producing different sets of failures. It's not going to happen often but
it will and it's one way flakiness will sn
Non-binding +1
On 2017-03-29 08:42 (-0700), Sankalp Kohli wrote:
> +1
>
> > On Mar 29, 2017, at 07:50, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Benjamin Lerer >> wrote:
> >
> >> Non binding +1
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Jonathan Haddad
>
+1
On 2017-03-29 09:21, Jason Brown wrote:
Hey all,
Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0665f40c7213654e99817141972c003a2131aba7a1c63d6765db75c5@%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E),
I'd like to propose a vote to change to allow any potential contrib
+1
On 03/29/2017 08:21 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0665f40c7213654e99817141972c003a2131aba7a1c63d6765db75c5@%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E),
> I'd like to propose a vote to change to allow any potenti
+1
On 3/29/17, 2:52 PM, "Michael Shuler" wrote:
+1
On 03/29/2017 08:21 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
>
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0665f40c7213654e99817141972c003a2131aba7a1c63d6765db75c5@%3Cdev.cassa
+1
+1 super binding.
--
AY
On 29 March 2017 at 16:22:03, Jason Brown (jasedbr...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hey all,
Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0665f40c7213654e99817141972c003a2131aba7a1c63d6765db75c5@%3Cdev.cassandra.apache.org%3E),
I'd lik
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Qingcun Zhou wrote:
> I wanted to contribute some unit test cases. However the unit test approach
> in Cassandra seems weird to me after looking into some examples. Not sure
> if anyone else has the same feeling.
>
> Usually, at least for all Java projects I have
+1 nb
On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 at 12:20 Aleksey Yeschenko wrote:
> +1 super binding.
>
> --
> AY
>
> On 29 March 2017 at 16:22:03, Jason Brown (jasedbr...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> Following up my thread from a week or two ago (
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0665f40c7213654e998171
22 matches
Mail list logo
